I've been reading this magazine for several years now, and find it quite
enjoyable, though I think the quality of submissions has gone down in recent
months.  Could be just a matter of taste, or a dry-spell in quality
submissions.  At any rate, seems like a prime time to submit a ...

Sorry if this question has been asked many times: If I put a roll film back
(6x7 or 6x9) on a 4x5 camera, will this change the effective focal length of
the lens? By how much?
I want to be able to control perspectiv by shifting, and have read that a

I have a couple of Busch press cameras that I want to start shooting IR
landscapes with.  I have small holder that slides on these older lenses
and it holds the filters with a small ring that screws down in front to
secure the filter in the holder.  I'm looking for an 89b for ...

Having used 35mm for 40 years, I've just purchased an old but complete LF
view / field camera kit, a 5" x 4" MPP Micro-Technical VI.
All seems to work OK except the Schiansky Ball head which fits on the Linhof
tripod.  In my opinion, the ball head is nowhere near solid enough to ...

Called around to get a new supply of film today - Tri-X in 8x10. Kodak had
neglected to add it to the offering of porducts in Canada so the people I
spoke with asserted that it was discontinued. After some discussion they are
adding it to the Canadian system. It is kind of funny ...

My enlarger accepts up to 6x6 negatives. It works fine for this.  But I have
been playing with a pinhole camera using 4x5 negatives that I can contact
print. But I would also like to enlarge them up to 8x10.
Is there a way to do this without having to resort to a 4x5 enlarger? I ...

I am looking for informations using a G-Claron 210/9 with 8x10"
Is there more room than a Fuji W 210/5,6 or a Symmar-S 210/5,6.
Thanks for sharing your experience
Philippe

Where is the absolutely cheapest place to have E6 processing performed? 4x5
and 8x10?
Cheers - Me

Greetings list - I need some expert advice. I'm thinking of moving my
photography up a few notches, currently I use Mamiya TLR's and Canon
A1's, and mostly do non-pro nature, archaeology and landscape
photography, with some vintage racing cars when I get my freedom.

I recently shot some outdated film at its advertised ASA,, but on
developing,  it looked underexposed and yet contrasty -- (however, I
was trying a new development process so that may account for the
contrast)    

Well my Ilex #5 shutter cable release mechanism needs a little work. The
cables (I've tried all 4 of mine!) fail to push the lever far enough to trip
the shutter. I can insert another long(er) nail or other and it trips fine
but my release cables fall a little short. Is this a ...

I've been thinking this way for some time and Tom V (on Pentax PDML)
gave me that nudge over the line.  Time to stop dealing with hardware
& always looking for that next goodie.
135 for color:

I recently picked up one of those old Fujinon W 210/5.6 for use with
both the 8x10 and the 4x5.  The image circle is reportedly a generous
352mm, leaving about 1 inch of movement on 8x10.  More than enough for
4x5.

Anyone know what size the filter threads are on a Calter 150. I want to get
a Cokin adapter ring for it to hold my gels.
Thanks,
Matt A.

Leaving aside any of the philosophical and semantic aspects of his argument,
there's one glaring error in his argument. He asserts that because digital
formats change (true) that digital images made now will become unreadable in
the future.