| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Tri-x 4x5 in Readyload | 31 Jul 2003 01:10 GMT | 2 |
I am wondering WHY Kodak is unwilling to make Tri-X 4x5 available in Readyload? Tri-x is a great film, and it does hold up well as far as local contrast is concerned when you do "Minus Development". I can't believe there is ONLY ONE Kodak Black and White Readyload choice, and
|
| Nobody but us chickens | 31 Jul 2003 00:57 GMT | 7 |
I tried sending a note to you privately but it bounced Subj: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: but.us.chickens: host not found) Date: 7/29/2003 1:27:10 PM Mountain Daylight Time
|
| Using Really Old FIlm | 30 Jul 2003 12:39 GMT | 5 |
I have several hundred sheets of boxed and sealed Super Panchro Press Type B Film -- Expiration date June 1957. Aside from short power failures and transfers to larger storage lockers, this film is reported to have been refrigerated at a local US Army depot. I bought it surplus ...
|
| Is it becoming harder to get sheet film processed? | 30 Jul 2003 05:02 GMT | 3 |
I send all my E6 to a local lab but am concerned that they will drop it. Have any of your local labs shut down or converted to digital only?
|
| Request for survey participants (App0721) | 29 Jul 2003 16:24 GMT | 2 |
What people think in the privacy of their own minds is not always what they might say to others. We would like to hear your anonymous views on some very disputatious questions at: http://www.psychrsrch.net/entry.html
|
| Help: tripod recommendation | 28 Jul 2003 11:55 GMT | 1 |
I'm hoping someone can recommend a tripod for me that will accommodate an old Burke and James 5x7 that has been converted to a 4x5. I mention the conversion because the B&J is quite hefty. I have two smaller tripods now, a Tiltall and a smaller, cheaper something-or-other but I ...
|
| 150 or 210 for landscape on 4x5 | 26 Jul 2003 01:25 GMT | 5 |
A 150 is kinda semi-wide ain't it? Why use a 210?
|
| digital print on baryt | 25 Jul 2003 20:09 GMT | 1 |
compared to the united states large format photography is pretty small in my country (switzerland). anyhow I just saw the first digital prints with a laserprinter direct on barytpaper (agfa mcc111) - the quality is awesome! does anyone in the united states offers the same service.. ...
|
| Why use tilts on a landscape infinity composition? | 25 Jul 2003 00:56 GMT | 6 |
Won't just locking all detents to their default position work? I want the scene to be as my eye views it
|
| Name one digital camera that can surpass 4x5.film quality.... | 24 Jul 2003 23:26 GMT | 34 |
|
| White Lightning strobes? | 24 Jul 2003 03:41 GMT | 6 |
I'm considering getting some White Lightnings, and I wondered if people here had some comments on them (or suggestions on alternatives). What I'm looking to do is both portraiture and location shooting (architecture). Of all the current systems, the White Lightning X-series seems ...
|
| Architectural photography | 23 Jul 2003 07:49 GMT | 3 |
I must freely admit that I'm getting into architectural work using medium format (Bronica ETR), but since this is where all the architectural guru's are, I hope you'll forgive me my sins. I'm in the process of getting into architectural photography, and could use
|
| Brownish Rodinal Developer | 22 Jul 2003 16:03 GMT | 1 |
What is the color of Rodinal Developer (concentrate) when it is brand new? Does it have a clear color, or brownish? Bill
|
| Steve Simmons how about a 100% digital art mag? | 21 Jul 2003 16:46 GMT | 1 |
It is the future Steve. Go for it. Fewer and fewer large format and film photographers every day. More and more digital in all formats. And I know this won't interest you Steve, but far more advertisers in the digital field now. Think about it. Opportunity knocks. (grin)
|
| Where can I get a slip-on (clip on) filter holder for filters to fit lens that is not threaded? | 21 Jul 2003 11:57 GMT | 5 |
Outside of hand holding the filter in front of the lens (gaffer's tape a possibility?). I have been searching for a filter holder for a lens that is not threaded. The outside of the housing for the front element is about 38.5 mm (or 39) in diameter, which I presume would take ...
|