| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Diffraction limits | 28 Feb 2010 16:23 GMT | 18 |
There is a straightforward explanation of diffraction limits at the link below. The page has an illustration of limits v. pixel sizes for several cameras (animated as you point at each camera type). It also has a calculator where you can simulate it all for various
|
| Photography and forensic science | 24 Feb 2010 19:52 GMT | 79 |
Ran across some interesting posts about faked photos. Led me to this: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=5-ways-to-spot-a-fake Then, ran across some opinions that RAW files cannot be faked? Wait a minute! The demosaicing algorithms are public knowledge. Algorithms ...
|
| AF Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED | 24 Feb 2010 11:10 GMT | 37 |
Discontinued lens, bought used for $400. Sharp as heck, though I did have to tweak the CA corrections pretty heavily and it's still got a blue fringe thing: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4020/4364830592_a1360d2d70_o.jpg
|
| Fwd: Three Old Men | 23 Feb 2010 16:50 GMT | 3 |
Three Old Men A woman came out of her house and saw three old men with long white beards sitting in her front yard. She did not recognize them. She said 'I don't think I know you, but you must be hungry. Please come in and
|
| The lens-sensor resolution quandary | 18 Feb 2010 23:49 GMT | 57 |
Four years ago, Olympus claimed their middle-line pro lenses would resolve 22 megapixels on a 4/3rds sensor. That's 88 megapixels on a FF sensor. Therefore, the conclusion should be (even though Olympus lenses in that class and the top-pro class are very good), even modest
|
| D3x ISO | 17 Feb 2010 00:10 GMT | 26 |
Since my D3 has been in repair for an unreasonably long time, I just bought a D3x as backup. Now I notice that while the minimum ISO for my D3 is 200, my D3x can go to 100. How do they compare with regard to image quality? For example,
|
| Interesting quantum efficiency comparison | 16 Feb 2010 01:30 GMT | 2 |
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=34536743
|
| Medium format stuff still horrifically expensive | 15 Feb 2010 17:20 GMT | 12 |
It's got to be the sensors. They must just not be dropping in price like sensors in more popular cameras like FF (35mm) or smaller sensor DSLRs. This latest (cheap) back is almost $20k and you still need a body and a lens(s).
|
| Canon EOS 550D, New 18-megapixel Camera with Full HD | 15 Feb 2010 10:00 GMT | 1 |
Canon EOS 550D, New 18-megapixel Camera with Full HD... http://www.techespot.com/2010/02/canon-eos-550d-new-18-megapixel-dslr.html
|
| [SI] New Mandates | 11 Feb 2010 17:52 GMT | 7 |
OK, here's the deal: in an attempt to encourage participation, the SI Dictator has decided to announce multiple mandates with a "capture date" so you can shoot for multiple mandates, and take more time for the harder mandates. With that in mind, here's the next three
|
| On my Nikon D90, what's the difference between fine, normal, and basic image quality? | 10 Feb 2010 18:46 GMT | 24 |
I can select an image size of large (12.2 megapixel (MP)), Medium (6.9 MP), or Small (3.1 MP). That I understand. I can also select an image quality of fine, normal, or basic. What does this mean? If I set the image size to "large", I find that a
|
| For Rich and his fans. | 10 Feb 2010 03:43 GMT | 87 |
http://www.dantestella.com/technical/lightcheap.html
|
| Autofocus observation | 09 Feb 2010 00:29 GMT | 30 |
Gear: Canon 5D2, 24-105; 50/1.2; 100-400 zoom. Works well, compact, etc. I was googling through some other stuff tonight and found myself checking out lens reviews, in this case, specifically the 50/1.2.
|
| Tamron-f teleconverter | 07 Feb 2010 01:36 GMT | 9 |
I purchased a Tamron-F 2x c-af1 BBAR MC7 teleconvertor for my Canon XSI. I have two Canon lenses, an EFS 55-250 and an EFS 18-55. The teleconvertor fits fine on the camera, but neither lens will fit down into the teleconverter. Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
|
| Lens-sensor Resolution Calculations Made Easy | 06 Feb 2010 23:38 GMT | 24 |
Further to my previous posts, I provide simple/easy calculations for determining the megapixel equivalent of a diffraction-limited system i.e. a perfect system. Using perfect optics with a perfect Bayer CFA sensor, how far can the
|