| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Pentax K7 the beginning of the end? | 31 Jul 2009 22:58 GMT | 1 |
Here is one unlucky fellow.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=32529245
|
| Old TIF Photos | 31 Jul 2009 06:33 GMT | 30 |
A friend of mine emailed the following problem to me. Any solutions from
y'all?
I need help! Now that I have a request for images of old family photos I
saved years ago to CD in .tif format, I need to open them. It ain't that
|
| Nikon 70-200 VR II | 31 Jul 2009 05:12 GMT | 16 |
USD $2,400 apparently. Ouch.
About USD $700 more than the Canon 70-200 F2.8 L IS.
Will it be better?
|
| Digital night photos aren't as good as film | 31 Jul 2009 04:18 GMT | 12 |
A friend who is a professional photographer asked me to research this
problem. He complains that digital night photographs -- e.g, a
cityscape at night with lights coming from windows in buildings,
street lights, signs, etc. don't look as good, or accurate as film
|
| Why in God's name did this guy frame these? | 31 Jul 2009 01:04 GMT | 28 |
Like he was going to keep those shots? Is this a joke?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=32477260
|
| How plastic degrades products | 29 Jul 2009 02:52 GMT | 3 |
From Swiss watch-like precision to...Fisher Price
Nikon Field Microscope circa 1960s:
http://akiroom.com/redbook/kenkyukai/200409-19.jpg
Nikon Field Microscope current:
|
| Don't hate me! I want to buy a Canon TI1 | 29 Jul 2009 02:19 GMT | 7 |
Is the 18-55mm EFS IS f3.5-5.6 lens that comes with the TI1 kit any better
than the 18-55mm EFS f3.5-5.6 lens that came with my Canon Rebel XT? I know
the new one has stabilization built-in but I don't need that for that lens.
Should I just buy the body and keep my old lens?
|
| Kenko 2X Teleconverter - NO MANUAL FOCUS??????????????? | 28 Jul 2009 20:08 GMT | 1 |
I have a Sony A100 DSLR with two nice lenses. A Tamron AF
18-250/3.5-6.3 DI II Macro Lens and my new Tamron SP AF90mm F/2.8 Di
Macro Lens. Wanted to expand the magnification for my zoom lens and
also for my 90mm macro so I got a Kenko Teleplus MC4 DG 2X
|
| Canon: We can't make good WA lenses to save our lives, but we did | 27 Jul 2009 20:25 GMT | 14 |
Most people are aware that anything Canon under 50mm is a waste of
money. So much so that Nikon apparently sells nearly as many 14-24mm
f2.8 AF-S zooms to Canon FF users as to Nikon FF users! But the new
shift lenses seem to be different. For about $2k, Canon can build a
|
| Canon's new "hybrid" IS | 25 Jul 2009 02:26 GMT | 12 |
Looks interesting - especially the comments re working with macro systems.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09072207canonhybridIS.asp
I wonder if a 70-200l F2.8 IS "replacement" might be one of the first
lenses to use the new system if this is true:
|
| How many of you still use filters? | 25 Jul 2009 02:20 GMT | 51 |
Just curious.
Not asking about using them as protection against lens damage, by the way.
|
| 3D Fuji ! | 23 Jul 2009 08:35 GMT | 3 |
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25821630-23109,00.html
|
| Vacuum Cleaner for Camera | 22 Jul 2009 03:14 GMT | 3 |
I have a squeeze-bulb blower to clean the
inside of my D3. On seeing the dust, it
seems to me that a suitable vacuum cleaner
would be useful. Does anyone know of one
|
| Tamron 17-50mm Barrel Distortion | 20 Jul 2009 02:26 GMT | 5 |
I have just got a Tamron 17-50mm Lens. I'm very happy with the speed
of it and picture sharpness. It is a bit noisy when hunting for focus
but it generally focuses vaey fast.
There is a very noticable Barrel Distortion with it. It is obviously
|
| Pretty pro-active of Nikon | 18 Jul 2009 16:46 GMT | 8 |
Contrast this with the evasion, obfuscation and avoidance Canon has
displayed during the discoveries of the myriad problems that have
plagued their cameras over the past five years. Only when their back
is to the wall does Canon seem to address blatant design or production
|
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage
Start New Thread