| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| You've been duped by Iran-re:9/18/07 Photos From Inside Iran | 12 Oct 2007 12:48 GMT | 8 |
You've been duped by the Iranian Government. Pictures from an anymous poster on 9/18/07 Photos From Inside Iran These pictures are distributed by the Iranian Cultural Information Center
|
| EOS 30D losing (some) settings - by design? | 11 Oct 2007 23:35 GMT | 5 |
I am currently experimenting with AEB bracketing and HDR, and noticed a strange, annoying behaviour of the 30D: The AEB bracketing setting gets reset to no bracketing every time I change a lens. That can be pretty annoying
|
| Why Olympus? The HORROR of sensor cleaning | 11 Oct 2007 23:06 GMT | 9 |
I think this (likely) $500 lesson should be a warning to everyone. Olympus's anti-dust system works, consider it. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1039&message=24931217
|
| Olympus was right: The value of good adhesives. Canon, Canon, Canon... | 11 Oct 2007 14:45 GMT | 23 |
! http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=24556138
|
| Monitor dimensions | 11 Oct 2007 06:30 GMT | 71 |
I have a small website (link below) created on a 17" Samsung SyncMaster 172W monitor (Wide screen) & friends of mine say that the proportions of the photos when viewed on a conventional TFT/CRT monitor are a bit narrow and tall. I would have thought that the proportions would be ...
|
| Ping John Bean & David Taylor: Samsung 24" LCD monitor clarified | 10 Oct 2007 19:14 GMT | 33 |
John and David, I did some nosing around with Google and discovered somethat that you two guys might have/probably did tell me about the Samsung 244T (or 245T). It isn't just a 1920 x 1200 native resolution
|
| New Tools Being Added. | 10 Oct 2007 18:06 GMT | 23 |
Talked it over with the wife and I have about another $1,500 - $2,000 for photography tools. I am thinking Better Tri-pod.
|
| One CLEAR example of price-rape in Canada | 10 Oct 2007 06:30 GMT | 17 |
Memory prices. See: Sandisk Extreme III 2G Henry's (Canada) $89.99 http://www.henrys.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ItemsDisplay?storeId=10001&catal ogId=10001&departmentId=10404&categoryId=10445&itemID=142902 Beach Camera $39.99
|
| Canon lens numbers | 08 Oct 2007 21:11 GMT | 7 |
is there any list of Canon lens numbers around - such as order numbers or versions? Example: Canon EF 28-90 A first version may have been *EF28-90 f/4-5.6*
|
| EF-S 55-250 Vaporware? | 08 Oct 2007 02:29 GMT | 4 |
I read the following under DPReview's "Press Release" section of their review of a pre-release 40D: ...new EF-S lenses are launched today in conjunction with the EOS 40D <snip>
|
| The end of truly high-end lenses? | 07 Oct 2007 21:38 GMT | 19 |
Both Leica and Zeiss are not turning out "cut rate" lenses. The introduction of plastic, the cheapening of the quality of the lenses to allow price cutting would seem to indicate that the era of the high quality lens is now ending. Now, not many people will shell out
|
| Which camera.... | 07 Oct 2007 21:24 GMT | 14 |
I am looking for a camera for use from a cruise ship's balcony to catch whales, and to take photos as we come into and go out of ports both for a cruise to Mexico's west coast and to Alaska. As well I want to use the camera for other things, but a larger optical zoom factor
|
| Optical Quality of D series lenses | 07 Oct 2007 17:55 GMT | 4 |
Back in the '80s I was a big Pentax user and loved their glass. Now I find myself a Pentax user once more, only with a K10D. Love the camera, can't stand the glass (plastic, whatever). When it comes to distortion, my 16-45 is a coke bottle at the 16 end and don't get me ...
|
| Dumb Question on Lenses | 07 Oct 2007 00:55 GMT | 45 |
have been using SLRs for about 30 years, so I probably should know the answer to my dumb question... I have a Canon Digital Rebel XT and have a relatively cheap (approx $150) Canon 75-300 f4-5.6 III zoom lens. I see others with the new white Canon
|
| In-camera I.S. kills a cash-cow for companies with it | 06 Oct 2007 20:21 GMT | 12 |
Canon charges 40% more for lenses with it. It likely only adds a few dollars to the production price of each lens. 40% profit is a huge amount in that business so camera companies that have it in-camera really are losing out, even if their customers benefit. This is why
|