tebo photo-design
http://members.home.nl/tebo/
Thanks,
Ted

http://www.ducaticanada.com/olympus/

Dalsa is supplying these to one or two companies, whose cameras run
around $30,000/ea.  Is part of this due to the fact the Dalsa CCDs are
a higher grade (fewer dead pixels, more uniform pixel response) than
the CCD/CMOS sensors used in DSLRs?  Even the Canon 1DSMk2 is

My new Nikon D70s has trouble taking low light photos.  My two previous
Sony Mavica cameras had no trouble.  Why?  I found out why...   its the
sensor size.
The industry is moving towards larger sensors in an effort to reduce

I don't know too much about the technology that goes into a DSLR, but I
have read a bit about how the light hitting the sensors at angles and
causing fall-off is the real reason why companies like Nikon have not
pursued the full 35mm frame sensor route.

If you shoot normal or teleshots, this appears to be "The" camera to
beat in it's price range.  WA?  Time for Canon to go back to the
drawing board and make some WAs designed to work with digital
sensors of that size and not just film.

It says here that many people are selling their iPods in order to get
a newer model.  What do people think about using an iPod to unload
your memory cards?
http://www.techweb.com/wire/ebiz/174400072?sssdmh=dm4.158428

One can find very old, very cheap prime manual Nikon lenses on ebay,
and they're supposed to be compatible with the Nikon DSLRs.
Has anyone tried this combination?

    Looking for input from Canon Digital Rebel/300D/Digital Kiss
who also are using it with Canon's new EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
lens.
    It seems like most user's of this new lens have at least the

From Steve's Digicams
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/e500_pg2.html
Lenses that are smart, that talk with the camera about their specific
optical designs and imaging information. Lenses, particularly zoom

I've got a friend who's purchased a couple of studio strobes (sorry, can't
remember the brand, but it consisted of 3 letters). In his normal
configuration he plugs one into his 20D via a cable, and the other fires
when it detects the flash from the 1st.

I know this is an incredibly naive question, but....
I just purchased a 17-40L for my 20D. I see some folks use the lens hood,
others don't. I have to be honest, never had a lens that came with one, so
do not know the advantages, if any, and if the 20D 1.6 factor changes those

I understand that compared to the f1.4 and f1.8/2.0 50mm, the f1.2 lens has
it's compromises.Does anyone have any experience of it on a DSLR, used as a
short portrait lens? I feel the out-of-focus rendition of the f1.4 might be
a bit harsh.

I'm obviously new to this, so please bear with me..
I can't find any online comparisons between the two, but I often see
"UK version, NOT Rebel XT".
Can anyone explain how  they differ, if at all?

This is in the most recent issue of "Popular Photography."
At high ISOs it achieves the lowest noise of any DSLR up to 1600 ISO,
without using a "blurring filter."  Seems to contradict other things
I've read.  In any case, it's sensor is a Sony CMOS.