| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Someone tested Canon's kit lens | 13 Aug 2005 00:55 GMT | 156 |
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/canon_1855_3556/index.htm Verdict "In lens land there's no such thing as a free lunch and the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II is an example for that. Under controlled
|
| camera bags | 12 Aug 2005 22:01 GMT | 15 |
I bought a lowepro bag for my Nikon D70s but am already outgrowing it. I'll be ordering a flash and telephoto lens this week and was wondering it you have any recommendations for a bag? It is so hard to decide on a size based solely on measurements! Thanks. Mo
|
| Compatible lenses | 12 Aug 2005 19:06 GMT | 7 |
I'm buying a digital SLR camera for my girlfriend. She currently owns a Nikon optical SLR (AF 8008?) with a few lenses (Nikon, Canon and Sigma). I want her to be able to use her current lenses on the digital camera I buy - does this place restrictions on the manufacturer I can ...
|
| Is there any graph that shows lenses versus sensors? | 12 Aug 2005 18:51 GMT | 10 |
That is, is there anything that says at what point sensor resolution outstrips current lenses in terms of what they are capable of delivering? Lenses have theoretical limits to resolving power,
|
| D70 & Dust | 12 Aug 2005 18:48 GMT | 5 |
I having an increasingly problematic time related to dust on my sensor, I use the camera a lot probably on the order of 10,000 images since its purchase and have had it for about 1 year. I change the lens on occasion, in any event
|
| Are flashes "cash cows" for the camera makers? | 12 Aug 2005 14:48 GMT | 13 |
Most of them look and feel like they cost about $20 to produce. Except for some really elaborate units. Why is it a flash for a $1000 camera/lens costs $300 or more? All it is is some control electronics, and a flash tube, neither of which cost much. At least
|
| Canon lens upgrades for available light action photography | 12 Aug 2005 05:46 GMT | 7 |
I've got a 300D w/ kit lens (18-55 f/3.5-5.6) and a 75-300 f/4-5.6 Tamron telephoto. It has served well for my very first non-P&S rig. My main subject is horses and riding, indoors or outdoors, and it can easily show the limitations of this setup. The big shortcoming of my ...
|
| Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR? | 12 Aug 2005 04:09 GMT | 195 |
A full frame DSLR with a telephoto or a 1.5-1.6 frame with a telephoto? The reason I ask is that most people seem to crop and it doesn't take much cropping (about
|
| Canon Rebel XT for the Girlfriend | 11 Aug 2005 22:37 GMT | 11 |
My girlfriend's birthday is coming up so I bought her a Digital Rebel XT (350D). This will replace the Sony F717 I loaned her a while back. It seems the perfect size for her hands. I'm planning a 20D for myself soon.
:) |
| Spot the 18-55mm Canon 'kit' lens ? | 11 Aug 2005 20:35 GMT | 31 |
I've taken 3 photos with 3 different Canon Zoom lens (non are L series), all set at 24mm f8 on a 350D. Full Res jpegs, hope you have broadband. Can you identify the 18-55mm 'kit lens' ?
|
| "Exposure" vs "Digitization | 11 Aug 2005 20:06 GMT | 49 |
After spending some time under the hood, so to speak, of RAW capture and data, I find it increasingly difficult to use the term "exposure" to refer to the relative degree of photon saturation in a JPEG or RAW at a given ISO. The analog to slide film exposure is actually the analog
|
| raw challenge v.3.o | 11 Aug 2005 17:04 GMT | 28 |
We have just started a new edition of our RAW challenge, just for fun. What is the game about? Download the RAW file, postprocess it, retouch it, boil it, add salt and pepper and finally show us what you have done with it. Just for the fun of it.
|
| Olympus E-300 | 11 Aug 2005 04:27 GMT | 4 |
I was playing with one of these in a store yesterday and unfortunately the salesperson didn't have a clue on how it operates (so what's new). From what I could gather, the aperture control is done by menu and the rear LCD remains on when the camera is on, switching off only during
|
| Which digital SLR system? | 11 Aug 2005 04:07 GMT | 14 |
I've owned a manual focus 35mm SLR outfit for the past 15 years, consisting of: Contax 139 Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 28mm f2.8
|
| Comments on this strange flash shot - please | 11 Aug 2005 02:13 GMT | 27 |
Last night was my first use of a real flash on my dslr, a 420EX on a 300D. There's lots to learn and I'm generally happy with the results but one of the shots came out *very* strange (and I think, funny.) http://www.panix.com/~adykes/CRW_9997.jpg
|