| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| [SI] New mandate: SINISTER | 18 Jul 2005 06:42 GMT | 4 |
SINISTER Take any object or scene and make it appear sinister. The best images will make the viewer feel a little uneasy, maybe not instantly but after studying the scene for a few seconds and understanding its
|
| Too drunk or what? | 16 Jul 2005 22:11 GMT | 11 |
The new me in these groups. Just adding some humour where there is none. Or... Another arsehole posting more crap. You decide but read the sig... http://www.ryadia.com/2much2drink.htm
|
| Yashica 230AF price estimate | 16 Jul 2005 11:28 GMT | 1 |
I have a Yashica 230AF that has literally been sitting up in my closet for 20 years. I bought it in 1985 and used it maybe 3 or 4 times. I also have a Yashica 35-70/3.3-4.5 (macro) lens. They are both in mint condition. I would like to sell it but am not sure what it would be
|
| Fixing old SLR | 16 Jul 2005 05:24 GMT | 2 |
I have a Minolta XG-1 (as I referred to in an earlier post), and its light meter is defunct. More accurately, it works great (in Av mode, which is the only place where it has a light meter) till you take the picture, and then at the last moment decides a 30 second exposure would
|
| I did the unthinkable | 15 Jul 2005 23:29 GMT | 30 |
I shoot weddings and yesterday, I was going to change rolls on shot #28 (Canon Elan - Fuji NPH), but I opened the back without rewinding first. I shut it and rewound it, but, of course, the damage is already done. This is a first for me, so I'm wondering how much damage? Did I ...
|
| RETURN OF THE SCORPION BUG !!! | 15 Jul 2005 17:37 GMT | 6 |
More silliness featuring the Scorpion Bug and a few of his little friends. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/46171402 http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/46171403
|
| PING Tuthill and other Minolta lens owners | 15 Jul 2005 17:33 GMT | 3 |
Bill, What would be your choice? (and if you care to say, why). Maxxum 17-35 f/3.5 G ~$1,900 CAD Maxxum 17-35 f/2.8-4 ~$650 CAD
|
| Today's business rumor | 15 Jul 2005 15:48 GMT | 12 |
According to published reports Hewlett Packard might be considering buying Kodak. What this would do for the remaining film business is a good question. I don't see HP wanting to own a huge chemical enterprise. They would
|
| Ethanol solution to clean lenses | 15 Jul 2005 12:51 GMT | 7 |
Hi all, I've red that a 30 % ethanol solution in demineralized water iworks very well to clean lenses and filters. I'm a little bit warried on using it, I've some T* Zeiss lenses. Is there the possibility to damage them?
|
| Konica Minolta Kudos | 15 Jul 2005 03:29 GMT | 6 |
After shopping for my Max 7D and getting the best possible price last March, you can imagine how dismayed I was when the Canadian rebate offer came out valid from May 1 ... But, I tried anyway, along with a letter explaining my long loyalty to
|
| San Francisco paranoid about photographers? | 15 Jul 2005 02:10 GMT | 25 |
On the way into work this morning, I heard a news story about the Bay Area Rapid Transit system (BART) in San Francisco telling it's customers that one way to recognize a terrorist or suicide bomber was that they take pictures of things that normal people wouldn't be
|
| Obstruction in DP-20 (F4) viewfinder | 15 Jul 2005 01:27 GMT | 6 |
The DP-20 viewfinder on my Nikon F4 has always had dust in it, but not so badly as to obscure the image or any of the indicators. Well, this morning I looked and all of a sudden there's a big black something that is obscuring the exposure meter (lower window). It's right on top of
|
| EPSON Perfection 2480 scanner problems | 14 Jul 2005 21:14 GMT | 5 |
I have problems with the first start up of my new Perfection 2480 flat bed scanner. After installing of the software, restarting of the comp and plugging of the scanner it is impossible to start up the device. It makes only
|
| Dust on film | 14 Jul 2005 19:23 GMT | 15 |
How to remove dust from a film stripe put in a holder of a film scanner? I have big problems with it. I keep films cut into stripes and very clean in plastic or paper bags. I tried many types of clothes, cleaning papers, leather, brush etc.
|
| ping roxy | 14 Jul 2005 13:22 GMT | 1 |
The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was 'roxy@empirerods.com'. Subject 'ping roxy', Account: 'mail.comcast.net', Server: 'smtp.comcast.net', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '550 [PERMFAIL] ...
|