Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
PING  AL DENELSBECK08 Nov 2004 01:44 GMT3
Yo, Al. Follow the bouncing email to wading-in net. Tried four times to send
SI image. All returned. :(
Vic
Minox 35: info needed07 Nov 2004 23:41 GMT6
Hi, I'm interested on a Minox 35. What opinion do you have about it?
Thanks all
P.
[SI] RULZ page - edited07 Nov 2004 23:37 GMT3
SIers, old and new,
I've taken over maintnenace of the RULZ page (conspiracy theorists, this is your
chance) as Matt Clara wanted to relieve himself of that maintenance.
I've done some editing, consolidated the amendments into the rules proper,
Another Minolta lens review:07 Nov 2004 20:03 GMT4
I prepared a small review to compare how does the new 24-105mm zoom
compare to other Minolta primes. Check the following link for more
details:
http://voronoi.sbp.ri.cmu.edu/~eshammas/minolta/lenses/zoom_vs_prime/
N65 or N75 - bulb and matrix metering questions07 Nov 2004 18:38 GMT2
I'm a Nikon user who needs a light compact camera for backpacking. I'm
considering a N75 or N65 but have two questions. I sometimes like to take
long-exposure night-time photos of star trails that sometimes last one
hour. Does either camera support remote camera releases that ...
[SI] In case mail has been bounced...07 Nov 2004 17:48 GMT11
       I hope this comes as no inconvenience, but my mail and web servers
have been down for a few days because my hosting service thought it prudent
to change the IP addresses and not tell me.
       They're back now, so if anyone has sent mail that bounced, most
digital a fad?07 Nov 2004 17:30 GMT72
I sure hope digital is just a fad seeing the way things are going with it.
My experience with P&S has been horrible, as has apparently everyone else's who
has missed shots because of shutter delay.
The higher resolution photos you take the longer it takes to save them, and the
Blue Tamrac 5273 Expedition 3 photo backpack and Vivitar 28-80/3.5-5.607 Nov 2004 15:26 GMT1
In case anybody is interested:
Vivitar 28-80/3.5-5.6, macro, multicoated, zoom, auto
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3851299176
Blue Tamrac 5273 Expedition 3 photo backpack
20D: ON TOP OF THE WORLD !!07 Nov 2004 02:13 GMT8
The 20D reaches great heights!
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/35916814
Minolta Dynax 500si manual07 Nov 2004 01:38 GMT3
My wife just got a second hand Minolta Dynax 500si, but it came
without an operating manual.
I promised her I would be her hero and find one on the web from some
friendly and helpful enthusiast.
Q: Hanimex Rondette 35mm projectors  - 1500 vs 1800 differences ?07 Nov 2004 01:25 GMT1
I'm trying to find a cheap projector on eBay.
Any one know the differences between these old projector models, as they
seem to crop up frequently.
They both seem to use a 24v 150w bulb, have wired remote, manual electronic
Vivitar MC 75-205 mm F/3.5-4.5  2X Matched Multiple06 Nov 2004 17:28 GMT3
I have one of these.  What is it?
See it at http://academ.hvcc.edu/~manniken/images/ebay/vivitar.jpg
Thanks.
Ken
20D GOES SOLAR !!!06 Nov 2004 10:55 GMT5
Well sun worshipers, here's one I took today, taking advantage of some early
morning fog:
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/35946204
And here's a strange one I took the other evening as I was driving up I-75:
[SI] Moderately cranky Jim's Comments on B&W06 Nov 2004 10:30 GMT45
Don't like it, don't read it, cause you can't unread it.
Jim Kramer
Skip M:  Very nice, but does nothing for me. I suspect that I would like it
better if there were more visible detail, but I know that's not going to
Scanning slides vs Prints05 Nov 2004 22:23 GMT5
I have not been satisfied with the scanned images I have been getting
with my Elite Chrome slides. I compared a scanned print with the
scanned slide of the same old building taken minutes apart in
different cameras and the print was much sharper than the slide. The
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 October, 2004
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.