Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / January 2010

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Profitable use of $13,000 in camera gear...14 Jan 2010 06:49 GMT4
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/1photo-pages/park-walk.shtml
Why I think Pentax is doomed14 Jan 2010 06:48 GMT18
Nikon, Canon and to a much lesser extent, Sony look to dominate the DSLR
realm.  Period.  Olympus will shortly move completely away from DSLR's to
interchangeable lens mirrorless cameras like the E-P1, though they will
probably save the basic DSLR shape.  Panasonic has already ...
Palm Springs, CA area14 Jan 2010 06:48 GMT27
I am headed down to the desert, Palm Springs, California next week, and
I wondered if there were any recommendations for a side trip on the way
down from the SF Bay area. I am familiar with Joshua Tree Nat'l
Monument, but not much to the North of PS.
Kit lens with Canon XTi?14 Jan 2010 00:08 GMT6
I've been thinking of getting a used DSLR, and have looked at the
Canon XTi as a reasonably capable low-cost option.  But I have a
question about the kit lens.  A lot of XTi's on Ebay refer to the
"Canon 18-55mm lens" or even "EF-S 18-55mm, f3.5-5.6".  But I can't
Early highlights from CES for photograhers12 Jan 2010 22:31 GMT11
End User Blog
It's time once again for the Consumer Electronics Show
(CES), which in terms of the world of photography means a
glut of new point-and-shoot cameras. Olympus alone released
CES now a dead-end for cameras?  Canon was right??!12 Jan 2010 18:27 GMT29
Canon might have been right to avoid this show.  Seems like it's a
showcase for lame, cookie-cutter  P&S cameras only.  A dwindling
market for a increasingly boring camera segment.
http://www.dpreview.com/
Nativity Scene Photo12 Jan 2010 16:17 GMT15
Yesterday I took this photo:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4261411032/
Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
2010 Epiphany Photo12 Jan 2010 16:06 GMT6
Taking advantage of these celebrations, I did also this photo, with some
different technical characteristics:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4251498587/
Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
UK Stop and Searcg ruled as illegal12 Jan 2010 14:49 GMT1
Police in the UK can no longer stop and search without grounds for
suspicion under Section 44 of the Anti Terrorism ACT.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8453878.stm
MC
Telling if a polarizer is multi-coated?12 Jan 2010 04:07 GMT3
It would seem to me that if a polarizer is properly multi-coated, you
should have a hard time seeing any reflections in the surface.  Is there
a better test?
Ocean County, New Jersey Attorney Charles Novins Fights Reputation     Thieves10 Jan 2010 00:07 GMT5
Toms River counsel Charles Novins has been fighting online vandals,
liars, libelers, and anonymous criminals.
The pre-eminent Jersey Shore attorney has begun fighting back, both
online and in court, after several years of abuse.
and the other side of the coin for Rich09 Jan 2010 22:06 GMT16
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=6&storycode=44853&c=1
A photographer who was arrested, handcuffed and detained for eight
hours
when he tried to take pictures of a road accident has won more than
Solar cells for less than 1 USD per Watt09 Jan 2010 20:22 GMT1
Do you know that you can find solar cells for less than 1 USD per Watt
on www.ebay.com ?
Regards.
Good vs. Bad UV Haze filters?09 Jan 2010 17:10 GMT44
I came across this site: http://photo.net/equipment/filters/
The author used a UV/Visible spectrophotometer to compare different
UV/Haze filters.  It shows four filters doing no serious attenuation
down to 350nm (which was as far as their instrument would go).  The
ACDSee PRO 309 Jan 2010 16:11 GMT1
I have this problem with ACDSee Pro 3:
I cannot use "PROCESS" nor "EDIT" although I can see all my pictures stored
in the database and I can print the pictures regurarly.
I have followed all the instructions found on the customer support to
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 December, 2009
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.