| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| S3 and lens | 30 Sep 2007 22:30 GMT | 2 |
Whats the deal the wide and tele lens for the canon s3? Can't really find any info on them - can I use a different make... are they worth the cash? Just want a little more out of the s3 without forking out for an SLR!
|
| Best dig camera for close up document photos? | 30 Sep 2007 20:04 GMT | 5 |
Any advice on a dig camera that would let me take legible and readable pictures of text on old documents at the library? These are documents that one can not take home as they
|
| Another Pentax K10D question | 30 Sep 2007 19:27 GMT | 17 |
Having recently gotten some very helpful replies to an earlier question re this camera (new to me), I thought I'd see if anyone has a suggestion to this one. Since I use this camera primarily in very long telephoto shots, like
|
| Kodak Endura Metallic vs Portra Endura | 30 Sep 2007 16:09 GMT | 1 |
Over at mpix they offer both papers... 29 cents compared to 49 cents... I don't mind spending more if it's really nicer... anyone know if it is Portra Endura Paper (aka Traditional E-Surface Paper) vs Kodak Endura Metallic paper
|
| Need help in selecting new camera, please | 30 Sep 2007 10:15 GMT | 8 |
Based on a recommendation on this newsgroup 3 years ago, I bought a refurbished Fuji Finepix 2600Z from Geek.com. It has been a great camera but recently broke beyond repair. That camera was only a 2 megapix but we shot all our pictures at the 1 megapix and were very
|
| Non-SLR with shortest shutter lag and hot shoe | 30 Sep 2007 09:54 GMT | 11 |
A friend of mine is looking for a non-SLR with the shortest shutter lag. I told her to get a D-SLR, but she doesn't want to spend that much. She also wants something with a good flash, or a hot shoe. I suggested the S5 IS but she nixed it because of the AA batteries. I
|
| truncated file | 30 Sep 2007 08:07 GMT | 2 |
can anyone explain to me what a truncated file is. i have a canon powershot a700 camera. after i took pictures they came on my playback as a corrupt file . When i downloaded them to my computer they showed as beingeither a
|
| sell cheap wholesale shoes lacoste D&G bape puma dunk dior | 30 Sep 2007 08:02 GMT | 1 |
Dear my friend It is our pleasure to meet you here. we are ale International Trade Co.,Ltd in Fujian of China. our website: http://www.cheapest-sell.cn
|
| Photo Gallery - HAWAII 2006 - paradise lost | 30 Sep 2007 07:16 GMT | 2 |
Waikiki on Oahu, Hawaii .. http://y23stockpic.free.fr/200608_hawaii_3/ http://y23stockpic.free.fr/200608_hawaii_4/ (and more...) 5 years earlier...
|
| How to save once zoomed, etc.??? Please help | 30 Sep 2007 00:39 GMT | 2 |
I want to say up front, you could not even consider me an amateur photographer. But I've encountered this problem more than once without a solution. I'm hoping someone here can offer me a solution. After I take some digital pictures, I usually view them via Windows Picture
|
| Linux software for making collations? | 29 Sep 2007 21:11 GMT | 14 |
I would like to print photos, four on each page. That is, each page would have four photos that I could cut with scissors into four individual photos. Is there some linux proggy or a script that could do it. Thanks
|
| Canon Powershot A640 or A650IS | 29 Sep 2007 21:02 GMT | 1 |
I like to choose one out of Canon Powershot A640 or A650IS Anybody experience? Or better recommadations in the same price range. Fred
|
| Do DNG readers age like RAW readers/converters?? | 29 Sep 2007 20:43 GMT | 1 |
I understand that raw readers/converters are improving all the time and it is not recommended to use an older converter. Since DNG readers/converters do a similar job is it also true of them? I ask because I want to upgrade my Photoshop Elements 2 to 3 (the latest
|
| What is the best way to view and delete photos in a full page view | 29 Sep 2007 17:04 GMT | 3 |
I take 100's of action football pictures and keep the best 5%. I am running Windows Vista and open the picture in full page in Windows Photo Gallery. I then close the photo and delete it if it is not good. The large
|
| An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye | 29 Sep 2007 14:59 GMT | 11 |
Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have
|