Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Which camera for night photos < US200?23 Feb 2005 23:59 GMT4
I have a Kodak DX3500 digital camera.  It does fine for me except the night
photos.  If there isn't much light available, the photos come out mostly
dark. The flash doesn't help because the subjects are far away - various
city photos for example.  I believe a longer exposure will ...
Waterfall stills and Cloud time-lapse23 Feb 2005 21:20 GMT3
Some new photography in my gallery, comments welcome.
Waterfall stills:
<http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=California/Bay-Area/Mt-Tam&PICS=16>
Cloud time-lapse in San Francisco:
mirror lockup23 Feb 2005 20:49 GMT17
Is there a digital camera similar to the Nikon d70 that has mirror lockup.
Canon 350D23 Feb 2005 18:52 GMT9
I have been looking at the test images from the new Canon 350D on
DPReview.
What would be the cause of the edge fringing in this screen grab at
200%? It is on quite a few of the edges, but not on others that seem to
crt vs lcd problem23 Feb 2005 18:08 GMT16
hello all...
i've got a question about an item that is driving me nuts...
yesterday I took a series of photos using a Nikon D70.
The pictures were all taken in the middle of a sunny florida afternoon with
Large JPG's but not very sharp23 Feb 2005 16:35 GMT10
Am very new to digital photography, just yesterday purchased a 3.2
megapixel Canon PowerShot 510.  I wasn't expecting perfect photographs
with a 3 mp camera, but I'm surprised that my images are not very sharp
at all.  I see that most shots I took today and copied to my computer
Dust on Sensor?23 Feb 2005 16:34 GMT6
Can the high end point and shoot from Nikon, Canon, Olympus or Panasonic
suffer from dust on the sensor as they age?  Or is that just a DSLR
characteristic due to interchangeable lenses?
Those wonderful Olympus lenses...23 Feb 2005 16:17 GMT13
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=12317645
Sheesh! - a 500 GBP lens on a 1000 GBP camera - and STILL the Oly maniacs
won't admit that there's a problem!
Which is the best digital/graphical alkaline/lithium battery tester today?23 Feb 2005 15:49 GMT1
It appears that the Radio Shack graphical battery tester (model 22-91?
22-091?) is discontinued, any suggestions on a high-end
household/consumer/photo Battery Tester? Thanks in advance for all
suggestions.
Unnatural looking digital photos23 Feb 2005 15:35 GMT53
I have read a lot from film shooters that they don't like the
"unnatural look" that digital photos have and prefer the look of
film photos.  After looking at a large number of digital and film
photos I have to assume that these people have gotten use to the way
Unique Photo Rename Utility23 Feb 2005 13:20 GMT9
I need a photo rename utility to rename my D70 images in the form of the
actual files date as the prefix + underscore + this incremental suffix, as
shown below.
Anyone know of a utility that will do *exactly* this:
canon 20d spots in blue sky23 Feb 2005 07:09 GMT23
I have my Canon 20D and think its a great camera except for one difficulty.
Wondering if anybody else has noticed that in outdoor shots with a lot of
blue sky finding spots.
I bought my camera from circuit city and the first one had over two dozen
Canon USM23 Feb 2005 05:31 GMT1
Is Canon's USM focusing (?Ultra sonic motor?) an improvment over the
"other" types (DC?)?  Does it make a difference to the average
photographer?  
Thanks
Low end digital23 Feb 2005 05:25 GMT2
Why do camera manufactures-pump out cheap DSLR?...They work on the gotcha
principles...Like cars or other consumer goods...But with a camera-you buy
accessories...They know its a way to keep you coming back for their
compatibility...Not so odd-this is common practice...However; ...
color temp a defacto filter?23 Feb 2005 02:17 GMT20
This isn't limited to digital photography. How appropriate is it to
consider color temperature a filter? And to what extent is the missing
or added portions of the color spectrum significant? Even with proper
white balance are data lost (or added?) at 3000 K when compared to
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.