Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Re: trilliums

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free PhotoKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: trilliums

Gordon Moat12 May 2006 05:04
> I've been shooting a lot with my Rolleiflex 6008i, which is a great camera,
> with great lenses (not that I can afford many of them).  I recently captured
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I underexposed the shot a little, as I forgot to add a stop for the bellows
> extension, but it scanned well enough all the same.

Seems like it would make a nice card for Mother's Day. I just did up a
Polaroid transfer to send off to my mom, along with a card. This one
works better than your previous shot.

Ciao!

Gordon Moat
A G Studio
<http://www.allgstudio.com>

Matt Clara11 May 2006 22:10
I've been shooting a lot with my Rolleiflex 6008i, which is a great camera,
with great lenses (not that I can afford many of them).  I recently captured
some trilliums on 4x5 b&w film, and thought I'd return the next day with the
rollei and some fuji velvia.  At the last minute I thought to bring along my
old RB67 and 150mm soft focus lens.  Glad I did.  The Rollei shots were
sharp and very well exposed, but the 150mm sf lens was more appropriate to
the subject matter:

http://www.shuttercity.com/ShowPhoto.cfm?PhotoID=104977

I underexposed the shot a little, as I forgot to add a stop for the bellows
extension, but it scanned well enough all the same.

Signature

Regards,
Matt Clara
www.mattclara.com


Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.