Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Re: Fall Back, U.S.A!

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free PhotoKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Fall Back, U.S.A!

rwalker05 Nov 2009 03:04
>>>I would have thought that the physical task of setting clocks is
>>>a passing and relatively minor inconvenience. I expect that
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Amen!

Glad to know there are some fellow sufferers!

Dudley Hanks04 Nov 2009 22:15
>>I would have thought that the physical task of setting clocks is
>>a passing and relatively minor inconvenience. I expect that
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I have to get up an hour earlier than I would otherwise, and I never
> seem to adjust to it.

Amen!

rwalker04 Nov 2009 21:46
>I would have thought that the physical task of setting clocks is
>a passing and relatively minor inconvenience. I expect that
>someone unused to DST would experience a more extended period of
>adjusting one's biological clock, rather like jet lag. You
>suddenly have to get to work an hour early while the clock says
>that it's still the same 9 AM.

That is my main problem with DST.  My biological clock is set to
standard time, and I'm an insomniac.  All DST means to me is that I
spend a good chunk of the year on (an even larger) sleep deficit since
I have to get up an hour earlier than I would otherwise, and I never
seem to adjust to it.

mianileng03 Nov 2009 18:49
> The next time they mess with the daylight savings time they
> need to
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> a.s
> is null and void.

I would have thought that the physical task of setting clocks is
a passing and relatively minor inconvenience. I expect that
someone unused to DST would experience a more extended period of
adjusting one's biological clock, rather like jet lag. You
suddenly have to get to work an hour early while the clock says
that it's still the same 9 AM.

I also wonder about the amount of adjustments necessary to
certain things that have to be scheduled according to the actual
passage of time. Like medication that has to be taken at strictly
spaced intervals. And is the daily evening flight changed from 7
pm on October 31st to 6 pm the next day? The collective workload
and the psychological adjustments needed must be enormous.

J. Clarke03 Nov 2009 17:36
>>>> Great - now multiply the time it took to do it by 300,000,000
>>>> people in the US. And don't forget the microwave, the oven, the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> A real corker for me is the older digital clocks that can only be set
> back an hour by advancing it 23 hours.

Yep.

The next time they mess with the daylight savings time they need to put in a
provision that no legislator may instruct a family member or staffer to
reset his clocks, he must do it for himself.  Maybe if they have to set
their own clocks they'll figure out what a pain in the butt it is.

What we really need is a constitutional amendment stating that any
legislation that a reasonable man considers to be a pain in the a.s is null
and void.

ray03 Nov 2009 16:20
>>> Great - now multiply the time it took to do it by 300,000,000 people
>>> in the US. And don't forget the microwave, the oven, the VCR, . . .
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> twice more to unset the change that was programmed into them at the
> factory using the old dates.  And no, they don't all have USB ports.

A real corker for me is the older digital clocks that can only be set
back an hour by advancing it 23 hours.

>>>> It's far less complicated than figuring out if the Customer Service
>>>> phones will be answered by companies in other time zones when I'm
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> And India splits it in to 30 min times zones.

J. Clarke03 Nov 2009 15:41
>> Great - now multiply the time it took to do it by 300,000,000 people
>> in the US. And don't forget the microwave, the oven, the VCR, . . .
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> VCR yes if you still have such an antique device my DVD recorder
> changes itself ;-)

Yes, you do have to set the microwave--it has a clock, if you don't reset it
then you're going to look at it one day forgetting that you didn't reset it
and end up missing an important appointment.

The real pisser is the idiots changing the date, so that some things now
need to be reset _four_ times, twice when official change occurs, and twice
more to unset the change that was programmed into them at the factory using
the old dates.  And no, they don't all have USB ports.

>>> It's far less complicated than figuring out if the Customer Service
>>> phones will be answered by companies in other time zones when I'm
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> And India splits it in to 30 min times zones.

whisky-dave03 Nov 2009 13:56
> Great - now multiply the time it took to do it by 300,000,000 people in
> the US. And don't forget the microwave, the oven, the VCR, . . .

But you don;t need to change the microwave, or cooker time do you ?
Cokoing time doesn't change depending oin time of year.
VCR yes if you still have such an antique device my DVD recorder changes
itself ;-)

>> It's far less complicated than figuring out if the Customer Service
>> phones will be answered by companies in other time zones when I'm making
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> understand the Chinese get around the whole damned problem by having one
> time zone for the entire country.

And India splits it in to 30 min times zones.

ray02 Nov 2009 21:21
>>>> Hello, my fellow Americans...did you remember to move all of your
>>>> timepieces, back an hour? Daylight Saving Time ended, early on Sunday
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> one wall clock yesterday.  It took about as much resources to do as
> sneezing.

Great - now multiply the time it took to do it by 300,000,000 people in
the US. And don't forget the microwave, the oven, the VCR, . . .

> It's far less complicated than figuring out if the Customer Service
> phones will be answered by companies in other time zones when I'm making
> calls early in the morning or late afternoon.

Particularly when you don't know if they're in Arizona, California or New
Mexico (for example) all of whom have different ideas of the time. As I
understand the Chinese get around the whole damned problem by having one
time zone for the entire country.

tony cooper02 Nov 2009 18:51
>>> Hello, my fellow Americans...did you remember to move all of your
>>> timepieces, back an hour? Daylight Saving Time ended, early on Sunday
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>the damned clocks twice a year. It should certainly be abolished - would
>make life simpler all the way around.

I reset two automobile clocks, two alarm clocks, one wrist-watch, and
one wall clock yesterday.  It took about as much resources to do as
sneezing.

It's far less complicated than figuring out if the Customer Service
phones will be answered by companies in other time zones when I'm
making calls early in the morning or late afternoon.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida


ray02 Nov 2009 17:31
>> Hello, my fellow Americans...did you remember to move all of your
>> timepieces, back an hour? Daylight Saving Time ended, early on Sunday
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> to the new timings. But I'm not blindly criticising something I don't
> understand. I'm open to enlightenment.

No logic to it at all. It's claimed it saves energy, but a study in
Indiana (a 'split' state) showed that to be totally bogus. It's
psychological - that's all. And a huge waste of resources, resetting all
the damned clocks twice a year. It should certainly be abolished - would
make life simpler all the way around.

mianileng02 Nov 2009 16:27
> Hello, my fellow Americans...did you remember to move all of
> your
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> some
> cameras), and did them later.

As someone living in a country where DST is not used, I have
never been able to understand the logic behind the practice or
how it's considered to be worth all the disruption and
adjustments it makes necessary. By adjustments, I mean not just
the twice-a-year resetting of clocks, but also adjusting life
(personal, business, time-critical management, etc.) to the new
timings. But I'm not blindly criticising something I don't
understand. I'm open to enlightenment.

John Turco02 Nov 2009 05:36
Hello, my fellow Americans...did you remember to move all of your timepieces, back
an hour? Daylight Saving Time ended, early on Sunday morning (November 1, 2009), in
our country.

I, personally, needed to reset my wristwatch, several clocks, various electronic
devices, a number of digicams and my lone DSLR (Pentax K100D); initially, I forgot
a few of the devices (including some cameras), and did them later.

Signature

Cordially,
          John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>

Paintings Pain and Pun <http://laughatthepain.blogspot.com>


Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.