What is the recommended minimum size in pixels (width and height) and
dpi for an 8x10 print?
I used to shoot with a Nikon coolpix 880, 3.x MP with an image size of
(2048 x 15368) and 8x10 prints from that looked just fine,
I am now shooting with a Nikon D50, 6MP with an image size of 3008 x
2000. So I am wondering how much I can crop the original and still get
a good 8x10 print. The main reason for this question is because I am
shooting a lot of soccer games and my zoom is 70-210 (not powerful
enough nor fast enough), so ofter I am not close enough on the subject
as I want to be.
Thanks for any input.
Scott W - 26 Sep 2007 14:47 GMT
> What is the recommended minimum size in pixels (width and height) and
> dpi for an 8x10 print?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Thanks for any input.
You will get a lot of different answers to this question, the best thing
to do is try it yourself and see what you think.
Scott
Richard H. - 26 Sep 2007 15:39 GMT
> What is the recommended minimum size in pixels (width and height) and
> dpi for an 8x10 print?
Like Scott said, it's subjective. 6MP can produce a good-looking 20x30"
poster if the image was well lit / low-noise. The more you crop, the
lower the resulting image quality will be; the more you enlarge, the
more noticable motion blur will be; some people will notice, others
won't care.
As a photographer, you'll probably find that you get more picky about
the technical quality of the image, while the kids and parents are
tickled just to have the shot captured.
FYI, Nikon makes 3 versions of their 70-300 lens, which is a great range
for sporting events. At $135, it's hard to go wrong by starting with
the least expensive version ($15 cheaper if you go with a grey market
version).
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=Search&A=details&Q=&sku=207359
&is=USA
Cheers,
Richard
ray - 26 Sep 2007 15:48 GMT
> What is the recommended minimum size in pixels (width and height) and
> dpi for an 8x10 print?
1152x864 Really - I've done some excellent 8x10 photos for publicity shots
at the community theatre.
> I used to shoot with a Nikon coolpix 880, 3.x MP with an image size of
> (2048 x 15368) and 8x10 prints from that looked just fine,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> enough nor fast enough), so ofter I am not close enough on the subject
> as I want to be.
It would be much better to get the proper lens.
> Thanks for any input.
Joel - 26 Sep 2007 16:32 GMT
> What is the recommended minimum size in pixels (width and height) and
> dpi for an 8x10 print?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Thanks for any input.
Again, you do not just look at the number_of_pixel but you have to look at
the whole image. And I bet you can see it yourself without needing any
answer from other. Or the whole thing would go like this.
- Pixel-to-Pixel, if you like 8x10 on 3MP then you should be 3 times happier
with 8MP. Or you should be able to print 3 times larger and still have a
smile.
- Quality-to-Quality, now this is the whole different story. *If* your
Nikon D50 and 70-210mm can capture a sharp/clear image, then sure you should
be able to crop to around1/3 to have similar quality of the 3MP (or even
better?).
*But* if it's a poor blurry image then the whole 8MP image may not even
equal to 3MP at closer range and better situation. That's one of the
reasons why many suggest to for GOOD FAST LENS.
Dave Cohen - 27 Sep 2007 01:40 GMT
>> What is the recommended minimum size in pixels (width and height) and
>> dpi for an 8x10 print?
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> equal to 3MP at closer range and better situation. That's one of the
> reasons why many suggest to for GOOD FAST LENS.
Nice try Joel, try 2x happier with 12mp, This assumes just as happy with
an 8x10 at 3mp as 16x20 with a 12mp.
Dave Cohen
Joel - 27 Sep 2007 09:27 GMT
<snip>
> Nice try Joel, try 2x happier with 12mp, This assumes just as happy with
> an 8x10 at 3mp as 16x20 with a 12mp.
> Dave Cohen
Thanks, and nice try yourself <bg>
DBLEXPOSURE - 26 Sep 2007 19:54 GMT
> What is the recommended minimum size in pixels (width and height) and
> dpi for an 8x10 print?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Thanks for any input.
Completely depends on the image and your standards of quality.
An image with no or little detail will hold up bettering to low ppi printing
than one with a great amount of detail.
An easy way to test without going through a bunch of paper and ink is to
copy out a small section of the image and print it at various resolutions to
see where it starts to look bad to your eye. Now, you know the minimum
resolution for that particular image. Make sure and copy out a region of
the image that has the most detail in it.
Frank Arthur - 27 Sep 2007 16:57 GMT
Buy a Nikon digital camera with 55-200mm VR lens.
> What is the recommended minimum size in pixels (width and height)
> and
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks for any input.
Celcius - 27 Sep 2007 17:58 GMT
> Buy a Nikon digital camera with 55-200mm VR lens.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>
>> Thanks for any input.
He's using one....