
Signature
Wayne J. Cosshall
Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
Publisher, Experimental Digital Photography
http://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/
> Hi All,
>
> The winner of the Lensbaby photography competition has been decided:
> http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1048
The guy gets six views and wins the contest. I didn't even like the photo.
I did kinda like this one tho, not for photographic reasons mind you,
http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/gallery/main.php/v/lensjun/tilted_panties_
alex_conu.jpg.html
Not impressed with the entries...
PZ
marrer - 20 Jul 2007 21:33 GMT
>> Hi All,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> PZ
if i was there, photography would not have been the first thing on my
mind!!!!
i thought the winner was great,although a little too perfect for my taste!
Matt Clara - 21 Jul 2007 02:39 GMT
>>> Hi All,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> i thought the winner was great,although a little too perfect for my taste!
Ya know, those pics of Tuscany with the clump of trees in a field are
cliché, but, all the same, that's a kick a.s picture. To me, the only thing
perfect about it are the clouds, the rest could use just a touch more
exposure. Or maybe not. I'd have to see to be sure... ;-)
--
www.mattclara.com
Wayne J. Cosshall - 20 Jul 2007 22:22 GMT
The judging happens offline and so the number of views has nothing to do
with it.
If you are not impressed with the standard of entries, perhaps you
should enter next time.
Cheers,
Wayne
Wayne J. Cosshall
Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
Publisher, Experimental Digital Photography
http://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/
>> Hi All,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> PZ
Nervous Nick - 21 Jul 2007 01:17 GMT
> The judging happens offline and so the number of views has nothing to do
> with it.
>
> If you are not impressed with the standard of entries, perhaps you
> should enter next time.
Hi Wayne!
The Lensbaby is a stupid name for a stupid, gimmicky product. I do,
however, salute the person or company that makes money off of it:
There is a sucker born every minute, as it has been said, and they
deserve to be had.
I am neither impressed with the standard of the entries (I think they
all suck), nor the pathetic hawking of this useless product.
I am having my period (a heavy flow day) so forgive me if I am unduly
polite.
--
YOP...
Robert Coe - 21 Jul 2007 23:08 GMT
: The judging happens offline and so the number of views has nothing to do
: with it.
:
: If you are not impressed with the standard of entries, perhaps you
: should enter next time.
Or volunteer to serve as a judge. The second-guessers could find out first
hand how easy it isn't. ;^)
Bob
G.T. - 25 Jul 2007 03:41 GMT
>> Hi All,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Not impressed with the entries...
I liked that one along with his other shot, both of Richard Cooke's, Elmo
the Chihuahua, and mine, of course.
Greg

Signature
Ticketbastard tax tracker:
http://ticketmastersucks.org/tracker.html
Dethink to survive - Mclusky