Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / General Topics / May 2007
digital photography software
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Nospam - 28 May 2007 19:12 GMT digital photography software
I currently use Photoshop elements 2.0
and was considering upgrading to version 5.0
A) I'm not sure if the extras I will get in version 5.0 are worth upgrading
B) should I get Adobe Lightroom as well or instead of.
there seems so many products to choose from.
any thoughts suggestions are most welcome.
I am only a home user who tidies up my photos.
thanks
 Signature Nospam
Stan Beck - 28 May 2007 19:44 GMT Unless you process hundreds to thousands of images, you will probably be a lot happier with the latest version of Elements - it offers a lot of tools.
I use Photoshop CS2, because I do more than just work on photos, although that is the most of it. I will upgrade to CS3 instead of switching to Lightroom (just my preference).
Elements - less than $100
Lightroom - $199 intro price, soon to be $299
Photoshop - $650
My suggestion would be to go with Elements, and put the difference toward a good lens, flash, tripod, etc.
 Signature The smaller the fine print, the less you will like what it says.
Stan Beck > From New Orleans to Brandon MS To reply, remove 101 from address. ***
> digital photography software > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > thanks www.kevinkienlein.com - 29 May 2007 06:38 GMT Don't get elements 4, very user-UNFRIENDLY>>>, maybe 5 is better, I have Vs. 2 and it is good, and just got CS3, haven't learned how to use it yet..... kk
> Unless you process hundreds to thousands of images, you will probably be a > lot happier with the latest version of Elements - it offers a lot of [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >> >> thanks ray - 29 May 2007 00:32 GMT > digital photography software > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > thanks The topic would more appropriately be 'photoshop' or 'photoshop digital photography software' - there are other options besides adobe.
Colin_D - 29 May 2007 01:48 GMT > digital photography software > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > thanks Elements version above 3 won't run on less than Windows XP. If perchance you have Win 2000 or earlier, the best you can do us version 3.
Colin D.
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Rob Morley - 29 May 2007 02:44 GMT > digital photography software > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > any thoughts suggestions are most welcome. The Gimp - it's free, so you might as well try it.
http://www.gimp.org/
http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/stable.html
www.kevinkienlein.com - 29 May 2007 06:55 GMT I have looked at this program (GIMP) before, but I don't get how you are supposed to install it.
On the second link you provide it says, "If this is the first time you're installing The GIMP, you will also need GTK+ 2 Runtime Environment below. ", however it does not have any instructions on what installs first, second, do you put it all in a folder, etc...
for non-programmers like myself it is not very user intuitive to install; so up to now have left it alone. They need more dummy 1,2,3 instructions regarding their program... Is anyone else as mystified as I? thanks kk
>> digital photography software >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/stable.html Koekje - 29 May 2007 08:25 GMT www.kevinkienlein.com enlightened us with:
> On the second link you provide it says, "If this is the first time > you're installing The GIMP, you will also need GTK+ 2 Runtime > Environment below. ", however it does not have any instructions on > what installs first, second, do you put it all in a folder, etc... If you download both, you'll get two ZIPs that contain two .exe files. Run the GTK+ one first, then the GIMP one.
> for non-programmers like myself it is not very user intuitive to install It's not that difficult, really. Maybe you should use Linux instead - then you can simply go to your package manager and say "install gimp". Then it'll take care of itself, look for a suitable place to install, and install GTK+ without even bothering you about it.
Koekje
Rob Morley - 29 May 2007 10:08 GMT > www.kevinkienlein.com enlightened us with: > > On the second link you provide it says, "If this is the first time [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > If you download both, you'll get two ZIPs that contain two .exe files. The latest Gimp setup for Windows is just an EXE, not zipped.
> Run the GTK+ one first, then the GIMP one. > > > for non-programmers like myself it is not very user intuitive to install > > It's not that difficult, really. Maybe you should use Linux instead - Xandros is really rather good for newbies these days - lots of people seem to be raving about it.
www.kevinkienlein.com - 30 May 2007 08:19 GMT will check it out... kk
>> www.kevinkienlein.com enlightened us with: >> > On the second link you provide it says, "If this is the first time [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Xandros is really rather good for newbies these days - lots of people > seem to be raving about it. www.kevinkienlein.com - 29 May 2007 10:09 GMT thanks I will give it a try... kk
> www.kevinkienlein.com enlightened us with: >> On the second link you provide it says, "If this is the first time [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Koekje jrblack10@gmail.com - 29 May 2007 19:08 GMT If your going to go through the hassle of trying GIMP, you should also try Paint.NET. Also free, and more user friendly including installation.
http://www.getpaint.net/index2.html
Paint.NET is free image editing and photo manipulation software designed to be used on computers that run Windows. It supports layers, unlimited undo, special effects, and a wide variety of useful and powerful tools.
Rob Morley - 29 May 2007 19:59 GMT In article <1180462127.765652.82370@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, jrblack10@gmail.com jrblack10@gmail.com says...
> If your going to go through the hassle of trying GIMP, you should also > try Paint.NET. Also free, and more user friendly including [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > unlimited undo, special effects, and a wide variety of useful and > powerful tools. I nearly forgot to mention this: http://photofiltre.free.fr/
www.kevinkienlein.com - 30 May 2007 08:23 GMT sheesh, there are allot out there!!! kk
> In article <1180462127.765652.82370@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, > jrblack10@gmail.com [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> > I nearly forgot to mention this: http://photofiltre.free.fr/ Nospam - 30 May 2007 19:34 GMT Thanks for all the responses.
there are a lot of image editing packages out there.
I have downloaded trial versions and free version of the following.
I will use the all on the same group of images and get a 'feel' for each one.
then I will pick the application or maybe two applications that best suits my current needs.
they all do various things better than others.
thanks for all the help.
Still thinking of getting Photoshop Elements 5.0 - it looks nice in the adobe web site, but I will see how the others work out.
Photoshop Elements 2.0 nice but no automatic red eye removal, takes 10 seconds to load!
OLYMPUS Master 2.02 (came with my camera) very nice but limited, not found out how to adjust mid-tones yet. may not be possible.
Photo Filtre
Paint Shop Pro XI
Picasa2
xnview
Fireworks 6.0
IrfanView
IDimager - Digital Image Manager
Paint.NET 3.08
Picture Window Pro 4
PhotoLine
 Signature Nospam
www.kevinkienlein.com - 30 May 2007 08:22 GMT thanks, will see what it is like... kk
> If your going to go through the hassle of trying GIMP, you should also > try Paint.NET. Also free, and more user friendly including [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > unlimited undo, special effects, and a wide variety of useful and > powerful tools. Rob Morley - 29 May 2007 10:08 GMT In article <1180418167.428298@netadmin1.interbaun.net>, www.kevinkienlein.com krash@junction.net says...
> I have looked at this program (GIMP) before, but I don't get how you are > supposed to install it. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > however it does not have any instructions on what installs first, second, do > you put it all in a folder, etc... Unzip the GTK setup and run it - it's a normal Windows setup program. Then run the GIMP setup. Just accept all the default settings for both install routines. When you first run GIMP it registers a load of modules and sets up a couple of folders for plugins and a swapfile, then you're ready to go.
www.kevinkienlein.com - 30 May 2007 08:19 GMT great thanks,, kk
> In article <1180418167.428298@netadmin1.interbaun.net>, > www.kevinkienlein.com [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > modules and sets up a couple of folders for plugins and a swapfile, then > you're ready to go. Joe - 30 May 2007 21:42 GMT >> digital photography software >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/stable.html I notice that version 2.3.17 has a bug, so which version might be best to download?
Joe.
Floyd L. Davidson - 31 May 2007 01:03 GMT >> http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/stable.html > >I notice that version 2.3.17 has a bug, so which version might be best to >download? Version 2.3 is the development code. It probably has a *lot* of bugs!
The URL, though I didn't check it, suggests that it will lead you to the latest stable release, which is version 2.2.
 Signature Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@apaflo.com
|
|
|