Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / General Topics / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

No flash on EOS 5D - How come?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joe - 21 Apr 2007 20:21 GMT
Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
professional camera, so why leave this out?

Also, how do you 'cope' with this camera in a situation where a flash might
be needed? It sort of implies that you 'must' buy a speedlite at the time
you purchase your 5D.

I don't understand Canon's logic on this one.

Joe.
Stan Beck - 21 Apr 2007 20:24 GMT
I think that when someone reaches a certain level of expertise, they don't
use these little wimpy flashes.

Signature

I really hate to eat on an empty stomach.

Stan Beck  >  From New Orleans to Brandon MS
To reply, remove 101 from address.
***

> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
> professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Joe.
Fat Sam - 21 Apr 2007 20:48 GMT
> I think that when someone reaches a certain level of expertise, they
> don't use these little wimpy flashes.

But that's a very broad and sweeping generalisation.
Stan Beck - 21 Apr 2007 21:59 GMT
Yes, it is.  But if you asked Nikon, I think you would get basically the
same answer, though put in more diplomatic language.

Signature

I really hate to eat on an empty stomach.

Stan Beck  >  From New Orleans to Brandon MS
To reply, remove 101 from address.
***

>> I think that when someone reaches a certain level of expertise, they
>> don't use these little wimpy flashes.
>
> But that's a very broad and sweeping generalisation.
Stan Beck - 21 Apr 2007 22:04 GMT
I forgot to add that while I referred to Nikon, Canon also produces entry
level and pro level cameras.  This would be a good question to put to Canon
directly, to see what their answers are.

Signature

I really hate to eat on an empty stomach.

Stan Beck  >  From New Orleans to Brandon MS
To reply, remove 101 from address.
***

> Yes, it is.  But if you asked Nikon, I think you would get basically the
> same answer, though put in more diplomatic language.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>> But that's a very broad and sweeping generalisation.
Joe - 21 Apr 2007 21:02 GMT
>I think that when someone reaches a certain level of expertise, they don't
>use these little wimpy flashes.

Well, I've used these 'wimpy' flashes and so have many pro users to great
effect, and very handy when you don't happen to have your speedlite in the
bag with you, don't you think? I mean, one extra option can't be a bad
thing.
Maybe a pro might not need this flash for studio work etc., but there could
well be other times he/she wished it were there.

Joe.
Stan Beck - 21 Apr 2007 22:02 GMT
Yes, you're right, but I don't think the lack of one will hurt sales,
considering the market that this camera is intended for.  This reason has
been given by Nikon for an number of questions - they produce cameras for
more than one market - amateur and pro.  Canon does the same.

Signature

I really hate to eat on an empty stomach.

Stan Beck  >  From New Orleans to Brandon MS
To reply, remove 101 from address.
***

>>I think that when someone reaches a certain level of expertise, they don't
>>use these little wimpy flashes.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Joe.
Fat Sam - 21 Apr 2007 22:15 GMT
> Yes, you're right, but I don't think the lack of one will hurt sales,
> considering the market that this camera is intended for.  This reason
> has been given by Nikon for an number of questions - they produce
> cameras for more than one market - amateur and pro.  Canon does the
> same.

Still, it's a bit like telling a mechanic "You can throw your spanners in
the bin now that you've bought yourself a socket set".

Different tools for different jobs, and I think the manufacturers are being
quite arrogant in their standpoint.

Having said that, they're multinational companies who are worth billions of
pounds, so I suppose they can afford to be as arrogant as they want to ;-)
Stan Beck - 22 Apr 2007 01:58 GMT
Yes.  There was a post on photo.net a couple of says ago re. the matrix
metering system in the Nikon D80 vs the one in the D200.  The post included
the reply from Nikon which specifically stated that these cameras were
intended for different markets (skill levels).

I suspect that here, arrogant or not, Canon assumes that one who buys the 5D
will probably have/want a set of external strobes (note, here I say set),
because he/she will probably be doing more sophisticated lighting.

Signature

I really hate to eat on an empty stomach.

Stan Beck  >  From New Orleans to Brandon MS
To reply, remove 101 from address.
***

>> Yes, you're right, but I don't think the lack of one will hurt sales,
>> considering the market that this camera is intended for.  This reason
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> of pounds, so I suppose they can afford to be as arrogant as they want to
> ;-)
Pat - 22 Apr 2007 02:41 GMT
> > Yes, you're right, but I don't think the lack of one will hurt sales,
> > considering the market that this camera is intended for.  This reason
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Having said that, they're multinational companies who are worth billions of
> pounds, so I suppose they can afford to be as arrogant as they want to ;-)

Different cameras are geared towards different people -- it that
wasn't so then there would only be the need for 1 camera.  Most pros
and some amatures have a selection of cameras for doing different
things.  That particular camera is aimed at people who wouldn't
necessarily use that feature.  Let me give you another example:  back
in "the day" when people used film, Canon had the "R" series of
cameras.  They used a semi-reflective mirror instead of a movable
mirror so you didn't get the brightest image in the viewfinder.  There
was no "pop up" flash.  If I remember right, the focusing was a bit
funky and it was split-ring focusing if you were in manual mode.  So
who'd want a camera with a dark viewfinder and funky focusing?  Well,
everyone who shot sports.  Because the mirror didn't move, the shutter
was REAL fast and the winders were like lightning.  You could blow
through a roll of film in something like 2 seconds if you weren't
careful.  The dark viewfind wasn't too bad and the flash would have
been useless because this was a sports camera and was most often used
outdoors in daylight.  Different strokes (and different cameras) for
different folks.

Another answer to your question is a bit more technical.  The guide
number on those flashes are so low that most advanced users find them
useless.  They just add weight to the camera.  Since it isn't really
an entry level camera, they figure that whoever buys it already owns a
flash.  Heck, I don't always get enough light out of a EX 580 and
sometimes have to shoot off two of them together.

So just figure different strokes for different folks.  If the camera
you have doesn't suit your needs, get a different one.
Fat Sam - 22 Apr 2007 14:14 GMT
Let me give you another example:  back
> in "the day" when people used film,

Actually, this example made me stop and think.
It wasn't so long ago that all SLR's were film camera's, and virtually none
of them came with a built in flash.
I use an old film SLR myself for certain shots, and just thinking about it,
it would look stupid and unusual if it had a built in flash unit.
So in reality, a built in flash is, comparatively speaking, something of a
luxury afterthought item on DSLR's.

I'm starting to drift round to your way of thinking.
Alan Browne - 23 Apr 2007 19:58 GMT
> I think that when someone reaches a certain level of expertise, they don't
> use these little wimpy flashes.

The "wimpy" flashes are great for controlling off-camera flashes
however.  That has a lot to do with expertise: ligthing.

On the Maxxum cameras (including the pro Maxxum 9) the "wimpy" can do
off camera TTL flash control over a 5 stop range.

Or simply, in manual flash, to trip slaves without tying up an add on
flash or using a sync cable (which has its own inconveniences...)

Cheers,
Alan

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

DBLEXPOSURE - 23 Apr 2007 20:17 GMT
Patrick Ziegler ImageQuest Photography
>> I think that when someone reaches a certain level of expertise, they
>> don't use these little wimpy flashes.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Cheers,
> Alan

Sure, I can see that as a good use for the "whimpy" flip-up,  But still you
can live without it, I don't miss it at all I you have to figure can thought
most wouldn't.
Stan Beck - 23 Apr 2007 20:46 GMT
I'll admit that this is a useful application, but I lived 20 years without
these built in flashes.  One other thing is that often, unless you go to the
menu settings, the built in will not fire if there is enough light.  I guess
I'm used to separate flash units.

Signature

I really hate to eat on an empty stomach.

Stan Beck  >  From New Orleans to Brandon MS
To reply, remove 101 from address.
***

>> I think that when someone reaches a certain level of expertise, they
>> don't use these little wimpy flashes.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Cheers,
> Alan
Alan Browne - 24 Apr 2007 00:21 GMT
> I'll admit that this is a useful application, but I lived 20 years without
> these built in flashes.  One other thing is that often, unless you go to the
> menu settings, the built in will not fire if there is enough light.  I guess
> I'm used to separate flash units.

Don't top post.  Further, as you can see in my reply, my post has been
obliterated due to your "--" + space.

Just becasue people "did without" for any number of years, doesn't mean
that something (like built in flash) is not of new potential.

And get this.  I hear that digital cameras are beginning to catch on and
that some people <giggle> have stopped using film!  Yeah right, that'll
be the day.  But this digital thing just might catch on.  I even heard
of some pros using it.

Cheers,
Alan

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Joe - 24 Apr 2007 16:41 GMT
On Apr 23, 7:21 pm, Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
wrote:
<snip>
> Just becasue people "did without" for any number of years, doesn't mean
> that something (like built in flash) is not of new potential.
<snip>

Here's the thing...take a picture with a direct, on the camera axis,
pop-up flash and then take a picture with a speedlight bounced off a
wall or ceiling and then tell me how wonderful pop-up flashes are.
There's no comparison. Pop-up flashes can be nice to have in a pinch
and yes they've improved massively, but they are in no way going to
replace external flashes--it's an issue of quality. You cannot get
great lighting with a flash on the camera axis...it's just flat.
Lighting needs dimension. It's not an old photographer being stingy
about old techniques and ways of things...it's just the way it
is...sorry guys :)

Joe
DBLEXPOSURE - 24 Apr 2007 20:07 GMT
Patrick Ziegler ImageQuest Photography
> On Apr 23, 7:21 pm, Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Joe

That's it Joe you said it.  Why build a fine instrument like the 5D and put
a cheapo hood ornament on it?

http://imagequest.ifp3.com
Alan Browne - 28 Apr 2007 21:33 GMT
> On Apr 23, 7:21 pm, Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> pop-up flash and then take a picture with a speedlight bounced off a
> wall or ceiling and then tell me how wonderful pop-up flashes are.

I guess you didn't read my other post.  I don't use the pop-up to light
the subject, I use it to control off camera flashes.  Whether this is
simple slave tripping of my studio lights or 5 stop wireless TTL control
of my Minolta flashes, I'd rather use the low power on camera pop up as
a controller, not as a light.

OTOH, with the Minolta system, you could not only use the on camera
flash to control an off camera flash, but you could set it in ratio mode
such that the off camera flash would shoot 2:1 v. the on camera flash.
For simple fill lighting (portraits) the closer the fill light to the
lens axis the better.  But I don't think (from your reply) that you know
that.

In the studio I usually block it with a business card and direct the
light to the ceiling which is enough to trip slaves or control
TTL-wirelss, though I've also taped non-exposed, developed E-6 film over
it to block the light but let the IR through for light trip/control.

This "economizes" using another flash on the camera for control purposes
and of course avoids using sync cables which can both be in the way in
the studio and occasionally not fire the studio lights.

> There's no comparison. Pop-up flashes can be nice to have in a pinch
> and yes they've improved massively, but they are in no way going to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> about old techniques and ways of things...it's just the way it
> is...sorry guys :)

I'm sorry you assumed the wrong thing and do hope in the future that
you'll back read into the thread before posting assumptions about what
was meant.

Cheers,
Alan.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Chris Down - 23 Apr 2007 07:48 GMT
> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
> professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Joe.

Lots of replies to this one, but no one gave the obvious answer.

Take a look at the 5D kits that Canon sells....   they all come with L
Series lenes.

Now take any one of these lenses with its lens hood in place and put it on a
camera with a build in flash.

Take a few shots and you will see why there is no built in flash on the 5D.

.
.
.
.
.

Still not got it?

.
.
.
..

A built in flash would be too close to the axis of the lens and part of the
frame would not be illuminated because the flash light would hit the lens
hood.    As the flash would be unusable with the lenses intended for the
camera it makes perfect sense to delete it.

Chris
Alan Browne - 23 Apr 2007 19:59 GMT
>>Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
>>professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Now take any one of these lenses with its lens hood in place and put it on a
> camera with a build in flash.

Flash vigentting is not a reason to exclude a flash that can be used to
trip slaves, etc.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Chris Down - 24 Apr 2007 06:38 GMT
>>>Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
>>>professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Flash vigentting is not a reason to exclude a flash that can be used to
> trip slaves, etc.

I would have thought that if you were going to all the trouble of setting up
slaves you would be fixing a suiable unit to the camera too.
My current body has a pop up flash and I am looking to get a 5D to be rid of
the thing!
DBLEXPOSURE - 24 Apr 2007 20:07 GMT
Patrick Ziegler ImageQuest Photography

>>>>Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
>>>>professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> My current body has a pop up flash and I am looking to get a 5D to be rid
> of the thing!

Buy it, it is worth every penny.

PZ
www.imagequest.ifp3.com
Alan Browne - 28 Apr 2007 21:39 GMT
>>>>Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
>>>>professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> My current body has a pop up flash and I am looking to get a 5D to be rid of
> the thing!

There is nothing "unsuitable" about using a built in flash to trip a
slave or control a wireless TTL flash.  It does not require much power
(and that can be dialed down in-camera by 5 stops (in my cameras) so the
"pop up flash" is hardy perceptible, but enough to trip/control other
lights.

Further, it frees up a flash to be used in a multi-flash shot.  I've
done this with upwards of 6 slaves and upwards of 3 wireless-TTL flashes.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Tony Harrison - 23 Apr 2007 10:11 GMT
I thought they didn't include the flash because they couldn't fit in the
full frame sensor and a pop up flash without having a camera the size of
a brick!

> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
> professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Joe.
Pete D - 23 Apr 2007 22:33 GMT
No thats not it, they simply decided not to.

>I thought they didn't include the flash because they couldn't fit in the
>full frame sensor and a pop up flash without having a camera the size of a
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> Joe.
Unspam - 23 Apr 2007 17:23 GMT
> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
> professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Joe.

I use one and I'm a professional, it's not exactly cheap either.
DBLEXPOSURE - 23 Apr 2007 17:50 GMT
>> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
>> professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I use one and I'm a professional, it's not exactly cheap either.

The flip-up flash has is of little value to the Pro or high-end amateur.  If
you can afford a 5D you can afford a good speedlight to go with it and then
you can make images without people looking like they got caught in the
headlights of an oncoming truck.

pzig
http://imagequest.ifp3.com
Richard Polhill - 24 Apr 2007 08:14 GMT
> you can make images without people looking like they got caught in the
> headlights of an oncoming truck.

My god, have pop-up flashes got that good at last?

;-)
Joel - 23 Apr 2007 17:53 GMT
> > Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
> > professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I use one and I'm a professional, it's not exactly cheap either.

    I have 2 Speedlite 580EX and baterry packs, and they turn into another
expensive toy <bg>.
Steve Wilcox - 24 Apr 2007 12:17 GMT
> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
> professional camera, so why leave this out?

I thought it was cos it would have made the camera body too bulky,
trying to squeeze a pop up flash on top of the prism housing . .

Steve Wilcox
dj_nme - 24 Apr 2007 13:33 GMT
>> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
>> professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Steve Wilcox

My thoughts are that it's because of the long recycle time of the
capacitors for the strobe and also powering a pop-up flash would reduce
the battery life of the camera.
DBLEXPOSURE - 24 Apr 2007 20:07 GMT
Patrick Ziegler ImageQuest Photography

>>> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
>>> professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> capacitors for the strobe and also powering a pop-up flash would reduce
> the battery life of the camera.

Nope, see post above
:-)
DBLEXPOSURE - 24 Apr 2007 20:07 GMT
Patrick Ziegler ImageQuest Photography
>> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
>> professional camera, so why leave this out?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Steve Wilcox

Nah, I think it is because Canon dosen't want you making crappy looking pics
with their 5D

PZ
www.imagequest.ifp3.com
Joe - 25 Apr 2007 17:32 GMT
> Patrick Ziegler ImageQuest Photography
>>> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> PZ
> www.imagequest.ifp3.com

Just curious, but who exactly is this model aimed at? Consumer? Pro?
'Prosumer'?

Joe.
Joe - 26 Apr 2007 19:02 GMT
> > Patrick Ziegler ImageQuest Photography
> >>> Why does the Canon EOS 5D not have a built-in flash? It's not a purely
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

The 5D is aimed at the Prosumer market.

Joe
Alan Browne - 28 Apr 2007 21:41 GMT
> Nah, I think it is because Canon dosen't want you making crappy looking pics
> with their 5D

You mean Canon want to force you to use sync cables in the studio rather
than slave tripping with a simple low powered flash?

I think you're forgetting a key point: it is not the camera that makes
the photograph.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

DBLEXPOSURE - 28 Apr 2007 21:56 GMT
Patrick Ziegler ImageQuest Photography

>> Nah, I think it is because Canon dosen't want you making crappy looking
>> pics with their 5D
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I think you're forgetting a key point: it is not the camera that makes the
> photograph.

Right, but don't forget, without one your gonna have a tough time of it.

Look, I don't think the engineers at cannon desinged the pop-up flash to be
the master in your master/slave set-up and probably didn't consider that
when they removed it from the 5D desing.  It is a cool way to take advantage
of an otherwise mostly useless flash.  I really think the 5d was desinged to
fit the Prosummer market where speedlight falshes are more common.

Puttign a flp-up on the 5d would be like putting cheap tires on a ferrari.
except for someone like you who would put it to good use.
Alan Browne - 28 Apr 2007 22:23 GMT
> Patrick Ziegler ImageQuest Photography
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>I think you're forgetting a key point: it is not the camera that makes the
>>photograph.

> Look, I don't think the engineers at cannon desinged the pop-up flash to be
> the master in your master/slave set-up and probably didn't consider that
> when they removed it from the 5D desing.

It's not that complicated at all.  It's simply Canon maintaing their
version of the pro paradigm and esp. wanting to sell IR flash controllers.

This is the same as the other nasty Canon habit: only the "pro" models
of their cameras have spot meters.  This is not so bad for digital but
for the dedicated amateur shooting slide film but who didn't want (or
could not afford) to pay the bucks for an EOS-(d) 1 digit body.  The
absence of a spot meter for shooting slide film is a terrible thing
Canon did to film shooters.  (Don't count the EOS 10(s) as the so called
spot meter was nearly 10%... hardly a "spot" meter)

In introducing the Maxxum 9, Minolta bravely burst the pop up flash
paradigm and made one of the best pro bodies _ever_ made for 35mm
photography (though not because of the pop up flash).  I never, not
once, used that pop up for lighting, but very often used it in the
studio for lighting _control_ which is the real reason it was put there.
 That camera sports a 1/12,000 shutter speed and 1/300 sync speed.
Very rare in film plane shutter cameras of any kind.

It would appear, however, that the pro Sony DSLR will also be bereft of
a popup flash.

(The only other film plane shutter camera with a sync speed as fast is
the Nikon F5).  Canon, the wimps, never got faster than 1/250.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.