Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / General Topics / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Best film for outdoors?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
WalkerTexasHiker - 25 Jan 2007 12:57 GMT
Ever since going digital, Ive used my 35mm less and less but I plan on using
it this weekend to take some outdoor shots.  I would like to know what is
the best outdoor film.  I want good color representation as well as the best
image quality I can get.

Thanks
Joel - 25 Jan 2007 14:35 GMT
> Ever since going digital, Ive used my 35mm less and less but I plan on using
> it this weekend to take some outdoor shots.  I would like to know what is
> the best outdoor film.  I want good color representation as well as the best
> image quality I can get.
>
> Thanks

    I haven't used film for over a decade since stared using digital, so
besides film noise and quality usually depend on photolab etc. I don't have
much to miss about film but some good memory.  Unless I have my own darkroom
and time I may go back to film, but probably never.

    Digital, with a good lens, good post processing skill, and may be a help
of polarize filfer then you should be good to go digital.  If you don't have
one of the top_of_the_line_lens then I would suggest to get one to enjoy the
quality (will worth the time and money), and good lens and good camera won't
go very far with good post processing skill.
Richard Polhill - 25 Jan 2007 16:52 GMT
>> Ever since going digital, Ive used my 35mm less and less but I plan on using
>> it this weekend to take some outdoor shots.  I would like to know what is
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> quality (will worth the time and money), and good lens and good camera won't
> go very far with good post processing skill.

What question do you think you were answering? ;-)
Steve B - 25 Jan 2007 16:55 GMT
What's "film"?
Joel - 25 Jan 2007 20:40 GMT
> >> Ever since going digital, Ive used my 35mm less and less but I plan on using
> >> it this weekend to take some outdoor shots.  I would like to know what is
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> What question do you think you were answering? ;-)

    I didn't answer no question but my story and some opinion <g>
Richard Polhill - 25 Jan 2007 17:02 GMT
> Ever since going digital, Ive used my 35mm less and less but I plan on using
> it this weekend to take some outdoor shots.  I would like to know what is
> the best outdoor film.  I want good color representation as well as the best
> image quality I can get.
>
> Thanks

Difficult to suggest anything without knowing what you're photographing.

Personally I like Ilford Pan F Plus 50 for landscapes. I suspect you want
colour though. ;-)

Many people like Fuji Velvia 50 (discontinued but still available in some
places) but it isn't really honest about the colour; tending to saturate more
than real life. Lovely colourful slides though.
Unspam - 25 Jan 2007 17:34 GMT
>> Ever since going digital, Ive used my 35mm less and less but I plan on using
>> it this weekend to take some outdoor shots.  I would like to know what is
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> places) but it isn't really honest about the colour; tending to saturate more
> than real life. Lovely colourful slides though.

Sensia 100 is excellent
steve@texasmetal.net - 25 Jan 2007 19:06 GMT
Ill be photographing some ancient rock art and the colors are kind of
muted.  Im not even sure what speed I should use..Im thinking in the
neighborhood of 200 or so.  Is the faster film less grainy than it was
a decade or so ago?  I used Ilford Pan years ago for B/W and it is
quite nice, but youre right, I want color.

Thanks for your reply.

On Jan 25, 11:02 am, Richard Polhill
<richard.n...@polhill.vispa.invalid> wrote:
> > Ever since going digital, Ive used my 35mm less and less but I plan on using
> > it this weekend to take some outdoor shots.  I would like to know what is
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> places) but it isn't really honest about the colour; tending to saturate more
> than real life. Lovely colourful slides though.
Gerald Place - 26 Jan 2007 10:11 GMT
Whatever you use you are in the hands of the lab you use, but personally I
still like the very wide range of tones offered by Fuji Reala if you are
shooting neg. If transparency I like Fuji Provia for the same reasons. If
you like higher saturation then go for the 50 ASA Velvia.

Hope this helps...

Gerald
> Ever since going digital, Ive used my 35mm less and less but I plan on
> using it this weekend to take some outdoor shots.  I would like to know
> what is the best outdoor film.  I want good color representation as well
> as the best image quality I can get.
>
> Thanks
ray - 26 Jan 2007 18:49 GMT
> Ever since going digital, Ive used my 35mm less and less but I plan on using
> it this weekend to take some outdoor shots.  I would like to know what is
> the best outdoor film.  I want good color representation as well as the best
> image quality I can get.
>
> Thanks

Does it really matter much? I've used top grade Kodak film  and cheapie
stuff from Walgreens over the last couple of years and I don't see any
difference.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.