My 2c?  It's a nice shot..

.. but I'm a great believer in 'less is more'.  In other words, what
exactly was needed in that image?  What did you want to say/show, and
how much of what is in the image is necessary?

I would have tried for a lower angle (to get rid of that 'thing' in the
background?), and maybe used a polariser (if you didn't) to get more
disney-like colouring (for a shot like this, disney is good, I think!).
I would also have tried to get in a little closer and maybe a little
left and down, so that the flower at left became a little more central
and to give it a bit more of a 'subject'.

But equally, backing off a bit and getting a row of similar flowers
could work too..

And maybe a touch more contrast..

But that's just me.  Someone else will probably give you a  reversed
opinion - just keep going, and if *you* like your images, that's good
enough to start with..!

I too like your shot.  And I agree with all that Mark suggested,
especially about the 'thing' at the left, and the contrast.  The
polarizer might take care of the contrast issue.

Keep in mind that there is never a 'right' and 'wrong' in photography,
just personal preferences.  Some of the most spectacular shots break all
of the rules.

Having said that, I would add that there are a number of 'time proven'
axioms that often work.  One is the rule of thirds, which says that
features or elements of your shot that coincide with lines at 1/3 and
2/3 of both width and height often result in pleasing composition.
Think of a tic-tac-toe grid on your shot.  By pulling back just a small
bit, and lowering your camera again just a tiny bit, you would end up
with the flower line-to-sky interface at the lower third hor line, and
each of the prominent upper flowers (or groups) would have been at the
intersection of hor & vert lines (extra bonus points for that?).  No
guarantee this would improve the composition, since the shot is pretty
sweet as is, but something to keep in mind.

Finally, I don't know if you're interested in post-processing your
shots, but if so, I see a hint of red in the sky, so if you took out a
tad of red, and also increased the contrast slightly, I would predict
the sky would appear to brighten, and the flowers would have more 'pop'.

Overall, a neat shot.  Keep taking lots of pictures.

The composition is not great. Lovely colors though so next time you see
something eye catching like this try lots of different angles. Squat
down, lay on your belly, rotate around the subject pay attention to the
background, try with one featured flower, try different apertures for
various blur effects, shoot from above at f/22 to show them rolling out
to the background with the sky beyone all in crisp focus and another
with just one flower in focus at f/2.8. Look at the patterns of how they
are arranged, this has an arch of flowers but then there's another on
the left & an angular row in the background: too complex & it's not
going anywhere particular. Wait for a bee to come visit! Move them
around & pose them if it gets a look you want. Endless possibilities.

Then spend some time at home chosing which ones are good compositions &
think about why. Keep that in your head when you go out shooting again.

I'm expecting to see something out-of-focus in the distant background...say
clouds. However, if I saw the shot with out-of-focus clouds, I reserve the
right to change my mind and say it was fine without them!

http://community.dcmag.co.uk/photos/foolsandkingss_gallery/images/165507/ori
ginal.aspx