>> I use the Canon EOS 10D and shoot mostly portraits and landscapes, but I
>> recently had the chance to play with a friend's Nikon D70....'and was
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> What do you think you'd be gaining by switching to the Nikon D70?
One thing which "seemed" to be different was the D70's clarity of shot,
especially when looking at portraits as it seemed to show things like
skin-tones, eyes, and hair in a much more realistic manner, whereas, my 10D
shots looked somewhat "flat" by comparison. Maybe this is just 'my' eyes,
but I'd like to know if others have noticed this.
Geo.
Stan Beck - 27 Mar 2006 00:28 GMT
I have a Nikon D200.
However, you already have a Canon lens. Why not look at the Canon 20D or
30D before you make up your mind. Try to see if a store will let you shoot
som images on to your card, and compare them to what you have. Both the
Canon and the Nikon systems are good.

Signature
Stan Beck
From New Orleans to Brandon MS
To reply, remove -101 from address.
***
>>> I use the Canon EOS 10D and shoot mostly portraits and landscapes, but I
>>> recently had the chance to play with a friend's Nikon D70....'and was
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Geo.
Paul Furman - 27 Mar 2006 00:38 GMT
>>>I use the Canon EOS 10D and shoot mostly portraits and landscapes, but I
>>>recently had the chance to play with a friend's Nikon D70....'and was
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> shots looked somewhat "flat" by comparison. Maybe this is just 'my' eyes,
> but I'd like to know if others have noticed this.
Probably the thing to compare it to is a Canon 30D though that's a bit
more money. I got a D70 because the 20D seemed too expensive at the time
& the D70 had more features than the Rebel.
Can we assume your friend's D70 had the kit lens not something big &
fancy and you were shooting jpeg? Your 28-135 lens is not very wide (or
fast) so you might want to change that anyways as it doesn't seem you
have been collecting lenses anyways. You might even just buy a new lens
instead of a new camera, the lens effects sharpness & contrast & colors
or flatness more than the camera body does.
John Fryatt - 27 Mar 2006 03:30 GMT
>>> I use the Canon EOS 10D and shoot mostly portraits and landscapes, but I
>>> recently had the chance to play with a friend's Nikon D70....'and was
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> shots looked somewhat "flat" by comparison. Maybe this is just 'my' eyes,
> but I'd like to know if others have noticed this.
I'm not expert at these things, but there are aseveral variables. Are
you, for instance comparing them by looking at the little LCD screens on
the back of each camera? Or have you uploaded shots from each to your
computer? Or even got prints made?
In the first case, the cameras might be configured differently, with the
Nikon having a brighter screen, which would make them appear different
but wouldn't affect the actual results.
If you've shot jpegs and uploaded them to the PC, then each camera will
have it's own process to create the jpegs from the raw data. One might
suit you better than the other, but adjustments can be made in the PC.
Or you can shoot in RAW mode and have even more control over the results
(at the expense of more time to do it).
What I'm getting at is that there are several variables which might make
Nikon images look different from Canon ones, other than any inherent
quality of the camera/lens, as such.
As Stan said, can you test the Nikon, and save a few shots onto one of
your own CF cards, then compare the two sets (Nikon and Canon) on your
PC? Ideally shoot raw on both and try to get the best from each, or if
you're not into RAW at least see what you can do anyway with an image prog.
My feeling is, honestly, that Canon and Nikon (and Pentax and ....) are
all decent systems, and you're really looking at pretty small
differences between them.
John