For Whiskers

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

MJW - 18 Mar 2006 06:36 GMT

Thanks again Whiskers for all your positive comments. I agree that its
not the camera, but the shot taken, that matters in the end, but i'm so
used to seeing everyone's posts about "my dslr this & that", that I
figure the only way to get recognition is to have one! Although, i'm the
first to admit that the photo's i've seen from other peoples cameras are
nothing short of brilliant!

Anyway, here is a selection of what I think are my best photos taken so
far. I have not set them up in a web-page format, as this is not what I
intended to do. Hope you & anyone else who views them enjoys them for
what they are!

www.members.optusnet.com.au/mjwyllie/

Signature

>>>M.J.Wyllie.<<<

Reply to this Message

Rooty - 18 Mar 2006 12:15 GMT

I have just looked at spider and web
excellent in my opinion
I am a trained photographer from college classes
my last one was documentary
But I never did class on close ups but on stuff taken inside
for close up's with tripod so I never got a shot as good as that
but I knew I had nothing I liked shooting but what i liked to do most
was self portraits taken with my Canon T90 not for someone else to
shoot me but I was composed and could sit and wait for camera to click
love Rooty

Reply to this Message

Stan Beck - 18 Mar 2006 14:09 GMT

You have some really nice photographs.

Just remember, the camera is only a tool. Two aspects to a photograph are
technical quality and art. Art makes a photo good or bad. Technical
quality only makes it better.

In the end, the lens is more important than the camera, and the guy behind
the camera is more important than everything else.

Signature

Stan Beck
From New Orleans to Brandon MS

To reply, remove -101 from address.
***

> Thanks again Whiskers for all your positive comments. I agree that its not
> the camera, but the shot taken, that matters in the end, but i'm so used
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> www.members.optusnet.com.au/mjwyllie/

Reply to this Message

Whiskers - 18 Mar 2006 16:37 GMT

> Thanks again Whiskers for all your positive comments. I agree that its
> not the camera, but the shot taken, that matters in the end, but i'm so
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> www.members.optusnet.com.au/mjwyllie/

I haven't seen all of them yet; my dial-up is not that quick. But you
have some terrific images there.

Signature

-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~

Reply to this Message

Littlemoot - 25 Mar 2006 12:03 GMT

> Thanks again Whiskers for all your positive comments. I agree that its
> not the camera, but the shot taken, that matters in the end, but i'm
> so used to seeing everyone's posts about "my dslr this & that", that I
> figure the only way to get recognition is to have one! Although, i'm
> the first to admit that the photo's i've seen from other peoples
> cameras are nothing short of brilliant!

Some nice shots indeed. I've posted this link before

http://www.mplonsky.com/photo/

but I think it's a superb example of just what can be achieved with
average equipment.

http://www.mplonsky.com/photo/equip.htm

Signature

Muttley!! Doooooo Something!!
Fix Outlook Express - http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
as recommended by your friendly neighbourhood MeltDown.

Reply to this Message

Whiskers - 27 Mar 2006 17:07 GMT

>> Thanks again Whiskers for all your positive comments. I agree that its
>> not the camera, but the shot taken, that matters in the end, but i'm
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> http://www.mplonsky.com/photo/equip.htm

Very impressive ::))

At the other extreme, some of my own efforts (a rather neglected set of
'albums', I'm, afraid) <http://photobucket.com/albums/y179/The_Whiskers/>.

Signature

-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~

Reply to this Message