> I'm an amateur enthusiast (prosumer). I spend more than I can afford
> on photography (but I love it).
>
> I got my 20D 2 months ago. Here's some of my favorites for your
> critique.
> http://www.phast1x.com/digits.html

Signature
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mike Kohary mike at kohary dot com http://www.kohary.com
Karma Photography: http://www.karmaphotography.com
Seahawks Historical Database: http://www.kohary.com/seahawks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Mike Kohary" <sorry@no.spam> wrote in message :
> Very good work for an "amateur enthusiast". :) I don't think you're
> using the stock lens; what are you using? You're getting great sharpness,
> I'm guessing it's an "L" lens.
-------------------------------------------------------
Yes, 'L' Lenses except for the ef-s 10-22mm.
17-40L, 24-70L,70-200L IS, 1.4x extender
-------------------------------------------------------
>Several of the pictures are simply lovely:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> http://www.phast1x.com/pix/IMG_2825.jpg (might be fixable in Photoshop,
> otherwise I'd discard it)
--------------------------------------------------
I toyed with it in RAW but didn't want to wash out
the sky so I left it. I justified it to myself by saying
"It's like a NIKE ad"
;)
--------------------------------------------------
> I would discard this one from the collection:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> actually great pictures to have sometimes, because you learn the most from
> your "near misses", I think.
-------------------------------------------
Very good to read your professional critique on this one.
I see what you're saying now and hope to see that
before my next press of the shutter button.
-------------------------------------------
> The others all have merit, and if that's what you can shoot after 2
> months, imagine what you'll be shooting like a year or 5 years from now.
> Keep at it and keep us posted!
-----------------------------------------
Used a film SLR, only on AUTO mode for 3 years.
Basically snapshots and toying with composition.
I've been reading alot, including here, very helpful thank you.
-----------------------------------------
Thanks for the comments Mike,
Phast1
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Mike Kohary mike at kohary dot com http://www.kohary.com
>
> Karma Photography: http://www.karmaphotography.com
> Seahawks Historical Database: http://www.kohary.com/seahawks
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mike Kohary - 30 Jul 2005 02:51 GMT
> "Mike Kohary" <sorry@no.spam> wrote in message :
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> ;)
> --------------------------------------------------
It's still a good shot, and I changed my mind - I wouldn't discard it after
all.
>> The others all have merit, and if that's what you can shoot after 2
>> months, imagine what you'll be shooting like a year or 5 years from
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Used a film SLR, only on AUTO mode for 3 years.
> Basically snapshots and toying with composition.
That is precisely how I started as well. Bought a film SLR for my
daughter's birth, used it for 5 years, then bought a digital point-and-shoot
and never looked back (today I shoot with a Canon 20D). I learned as much
about photography in the first year of owning the digital as I did in all 5
years of owning the film camera. The instant feedback of digital is simply
priceless.
Good luck to you!

Signature
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mike Kohary mike at kohary dot com http://www.kohary.com
Karma Photography: http://www.karmaphotography.com
Seahawks Historical Database: http://www.kohary.com/seahawks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~