> I am looking for a lens for enhanced landscapes/cityscapes (not
> portraits). I am using the stock 28-80mm AF Nikkor lens, and I need a
> stronger focal length lens. At any rate, a cursory bit of research at
> bhphotovideo.com reveals a ton of options, some of which are included
> here:
One of the decision points will be what minimum length do you need, to
reduce lens changes in the field (really, to avoid toting the extra
lense, or regretting not having it in the bag).
Consider some of the shots you've been taking - how many of them have
been near your current limit of 80mm? This is close to the short-end of
longer zooms. And for the shots you didn't get, how much farther did
you want to zoom?
This will help you decide if you want to pursue a single-lens solution,
or a pair of lenses with longer zoom at the top end.
If you go for a 2-lens setup, you'll want some amount of overlap between
them to avoid changing lenses a lot.
> Reasonably priced 70-300mm zoom lens:
> http://tinyurl.com/5s89a
I have this one and I've been happy with it - a really good combination
of wide focal range, and relatively low f-stop. You can go much more
expensive for a faster lens (wish list). Only drawback is no internal
focus, so circ polarizer filter requires more fiddling.
This range is really good for most outdoor shooting, though 70mm is a
bit narrow for some shots. You can't have it all - the more expensive
lenses are even more limited, to improve on the quality. This 70-300
lens is a good complement to a shorter zoom with good macro capability
like this one:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=1
65829&is=USA
> Feature rich 35 - 120mm zoom lens:
> http://tinyurl.com/2uckg
Looks nice, if you're in the market to replace (not supplement) your
current lens. An extra 40mm of range won't be that significant for the
money. I'm not sure if the VR is worth the money; it seems more useful
in low-light handheld situations - in those cases, if the subject is
moving much, I'm not sure VR would counteract it. Clearly there's a
market for it, though.
> 28-200mm reasonably priced lens:
> http://tinyurl.com/4xvmh
This one is pretty nice. You sacrifice the extra length of a 200mm, and
in exchange you get a single lens that goes the entire range from wide
angle to zoom. This could be your only lens for 90% of your shooting.
Internal focus too. But for the occasional macro and super-long, you'll
need 2 other lenses.
> Sigma 28-300mm zoom/wide angle lens (very inexpensive)
> http://tinyurl.com/5lonc
Yep, pretty cheap. And the really wide range is appealing. A little
sacrifice in f-stop on the long end. Otherwise, some of its differences
are likely to be softer features like motor noise, motor speed, image
quality. There's got to be a compromise somewhere; you just need to
figure out what it is and if you're OK with it.
> Super cheap, 70-300mm zoom lens form Tamron:
> http://tinyurl.com/5fknz
Ditto.
> Ditto - but 28 - 200mm, inexpensive Tamron:
> http://tinyurl.com/9lr4b
Ditto, but shorter range.
Cheers,
Richard
kombi45@yahoo.com - 23 May 2005 19:00 GMT
> > Reasonably priced 70-300mm zoom lens:
> > http://tinyurl.com/5s89a
> I have this one and I've been happy with it - a really good combination
> of wide focal range, and relatively low f-stop. You can go much more
> expensive for a faster lens (wish list). Only drawback is no internal
> focus, so circ polarizer filter requires more fiddling.
Richard - Can you adjust ap/speed from the thumb dials?
Richard H. - 24 May 2005 02:44 GMT
> Richard - Can you adjust ap/speed from the thumb dials?
Yes... full control through the dials, if that's what you mean.
By default, the front wheel on the N80 is aperature and the back is
shutter speed. I prefer then reversed, since I prefer the thumb wheel
and tend to shoot aperature priority.
In program mode, the aperature wheel will temporarily shift the
preferred aperature. Turning the camera off will reset this preference.
It works a lot like aperature priority, but the camera has the option
to override the preference.
Cheers,
Richard
> I am looking for a lens for enhanced landscapes/cityscapes (not
> portraits). I am using the stock 28-80mm AF Nikkor lens, and I need a
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> At any rate, any recommendations on a quality lens in the $250 - $500
> range would be greatly appreciated.
You seem to have missed the excellent 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G AF-S lens.
http://tinyurl.com/bmpux
I don't think you will be disappointed. I own this lens and I live it.

Signature
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
Spammers please contact me at renegade@veldy.net.
kombi45@yahoo.com - 24 May 2005 03:43 GMT
> You seem to have missed the excellent 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G AF-S lens.
> http://tinyurl.com/bmpux
>
> I don't think you will be disappointed. I own this lens and I live it.
My current lens is 28 - 80mm. I'm looking for a zoom or zoom/wide
angle lens.
Ben
Thomas T. Veldhouse - 24 May 2005 12:13 GMT
>> You seem to have missed the excellent 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G AF-S lens.
>> http://tinyurl.com/bmpux
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> My current lens is 28 - 80mm. I'm looking for a zoom or zoom/wide
> angle lens.
It is a zoom/wide. Wide angle is mostly any focal length below 50mm.
Really, in practice, it is any focal length below 35mm. Zoom just means
it is a variable focal length lens. Perhaps what you are looking for is
telephoto (makes things appear closer)?

Signature
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
Spammers please contact me at renegade@veldy.net.
Scumbag - 29 May 2005 11:14 GMT
>> You seem to have missed the excellent 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G AF-S lens.
>> http://tinyurl.com/bmpux
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> My current lens is 28 - 80mm. I'm looking for a zoom or zoom/wide
> angle lens.
I have several lenses for my Nikon, but the one that almost never leaves the
camera is my Nikkor 24-120. Although it doesn't appear so by looking at the
numbers, there is a huge difference between a 24mm focal length and 28mm. I
find myself taking far more pictures at 24mm than I do at 120mm. I loaned
my 24-120 to a friend of mine and he liked it so well he bought himself one
a week later. The Nikkor 24-85 as previously mentioned might be a good
choice also, but I've never used that lens so I can't offer an opinion on
it. As far as landscapes go, when you go down to 24mm, you have a huge
depth of field so you can focus from about 1-2 ft to infinity with no
problems. The larger focal length of the lens works so well for portraits,
I hardly ever use my 105mm Nikkor anymore.
As far as getting one of those extreme zooms like a 28-300, I wouldn't
recommend it. I had one once, hated it, and got rid of it in short order.
If you need that type of focal range, go with a combination of two lenses.
Something like a 24-120 and a 70-300mm. You'll be much happier.