>> Leica.
>
> Not a bad idea, but they're a little expensive for a point and shoot:
You kinda have to know who I'm replying to to catch the rub here.
Expensive really didn't have anything to do with it, although they
really are expensive compared to what you can get for the same money in
a Canon or Nikon, relatively speaking. No, the point was format, not
price. ;o)
> >> Leica.
> >
> > Not a bad idea, but they're a little expensive for a point and shoot:
> +++++++++
>
> Is not the word "expensive" a relative term? Hmm? :)