Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / General Topics / September 2004
Buying Digital Camera Ques
|
|
Thread rating:  |
BMC - 27 Sep 2004 18:55 GMT Hi, I'm thinking of buying a digital camera and was wondering what should I look for in a DC and also what system requirements on my PC do I need ? I'm completely new to this so any input would be appreciated. I'm not looking for anything fancy; just a camera I can use for my eBay selling and occasional trip. (I will never part with my manual SLR. :))
I recently saw a Konica w/1.2 pixel, 4.8mm for about USD$70, i think. Is that good?
BTW, my PC runs on Windows 98.
Thanks, kc
BillB - 27 Sep 2004 23:00 GMT > I'm not looking > for anything fancy; just a camera I can use for my eBay selling and > occasional trip. (I will never part with my manual SLR. :)) > > I recently saw a Konica w/1.2 pixel, 4.8mm for about USD$70, i think. Is > that good? That's probably more than adequate for eBay pictures, but compared to your SLR you may be very disappointed by quality of the travel pictures it takes as well as how it takes them. For example, most older, cheaper digital cameras have a significant delay between the time you press the shutter release and when the picture is actually taken, so you may not get what you want when taking pictures of moving objects. For learning to use DCs it's probably ok and will also allow you to not only familiarize yourself with digital camera and their quirks, but computer software as well. Then, in a year or three if you feel like it's time to get a better camera, you'll be more knowledgeable and in a better position to avoid making costly mistake choosing the wrong camera with the wrong set of features. And if you aren't expecting too much from the Konica, it may be good choice. If the Konica is used though, I'd want to make sure it can be powered by inexpensive NiMH rechargeable AA batteries. If it uses a proprietary rechargeable battery that may be nearing the end of its useful life, another battery might cost almost as much as the camera!
> BTW, my PC runs on Windows 98. That's fine. I generally use Win95 to work with my digital pictures. If the Konica is old enough, it may use a serial cable instead of USB to transfer pictures to the computer, in which case you'd want to get an inexpensive USB card reader to transfer pictures to the computer.
Marvin Margoshes - 28 Sep 2004 18:03 GMT > Hi, > I'm thinking of buying a digital camera and was wondering what should I [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Thanks, > kc This camera won't be very god even for trips. It will only let you make fairly small prints. But it may let you get a little experience with digital photography that will help you decide on what kind of good digicam to get. On the other hand, it might turn you off on digital photography before oyu see what a good digicam can do.
Digital photography isn't a complete replacement for film photography, but it does have many advantages. You see the result quickly, which helps to learn how to take even better photos. And since there is essentially no cost per photo unless you decide to print it, you are likely to take many more photos.
As for the PC requirements, almost any PC will do for the small image files from the Konica you mention. Beyond that, it depends on what kind of image editing you will do. Simple steps like cropping don't demand much from the PC, but affordable software will let you do pretty much whatever you can do in a darkroom, and quite a bit more. The more advanced image editors need a fast processor, lost of memory, and a good display.
BMC - 29 Sep 2004 01:39 GMT Thanks for the posts.
Do I need a minimum amount of RAM on my PC?
~~~~~~~~~~
> > Hi, > > I'm thinking of buying a digital camera and was wondering what should I [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > in a darkroom, and quite a bit more. The more advanced image editors need a > fast processor, lost of memory, and a good display. dj_nme - 29 Sep 2004 08:58 GMT > Thanks for the posts. > > Do I need a minimum amount of RAM on my PC? My motto with computer memory is "buy as much as you can afford". With RAM, more is usual better (except in special cases, like Windows 95, 98 and 98SE, where the maximum they can handle is 512Mb).
HTH
-- Tua materis caligulas gerit!
Randall Ainsworth - 29 Sep 2004 14:07 GMT In article <415a6b5c$0$26024$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>, dj_nme
> My motto with computer memory is "buy as much as you can afford". > With RAM, more is usual better (except in special cases, like Windows > 95, 98 and 98SE, where the maximum they can handle is 512Mb). Actually, Windows 9x won't use much beyond 128MB effectively.
D.R. - 30 Sep 2004 05:41 GMT > In article > <415a6b5c$0$26024$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>, dj_nme [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Actually, Windows 9x won't use much beyond 128MB effectively. Actually Windows 98SE runs great with 512MB. Any more RAM, then you have to change some of the Win98 system settings to get it to work. I notice big differences when 3D gaming having the 512MB. Anything less than 256MB is not great for games, even on 98. I would imagine Photoshop would be the same. I use PSP7 and the extra RAM is much needed.
D.R.
Randall Ainsworth - 30 Sep 2004 14:25 GMT > Actually Windows 98SE runs great with 512MB. Any more RAM, then you have to > change some of the Win98 system settings to get it to work. I notice big > differences when 3D gaming having the 512MB. Anything less than 256MB is not > great for games, even on 98. I would imagine Photoshop would be the same. I > use > PSP7 and the extra RAM is much needed. I didn't say that it wouldn't work, but Windows 9x will not use much beyond 128MB very effectively.
Marvin Margoshes - 29 Sep 2004 16:54 GMT > Thanks for the posts. > > Do I need a minimum amount of RAM on my PC? In most PCs, Windows uses a part of the hard drive when it runs out of RAM. That slows down the processing, but it lets the job get done. Memory is cheap, and it is often the most effective way to improve PC performance.
> ~~~~~~~~~~ >> [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > a >> fast processor, lost of memory, and a good display. Scott - 29 Sep 2004 21:12 GMT For your needs you should get a Point-and-Shoot digital camera -- at the very minimum 2 megapixel (though you can only really print small picture). 3 MP would be better. For anything worth taking with you on your travels, you'll have to spend at least $150-200 for something good.
You can find reviews of different digital cameras by category (for example, Budget Buyer, Traveler, Point-and-Shoot, etc), and read what other camera owners have to say about each camera at:
http://www.Review-Center.com
GREAT VALUE If price is not as much of a constraint for you, get the Canon PowerShot A75 3.2MP Digital Camera with 3X Optical Zoom for about $225. I would say that a 3 MP camera is much better than a 2 MP camera if you're going to take the camera on vacations. http://digital-camera.review-center.com/catalog/product.php?ASIN=B0001G6U4S
CHEAPER CAMERAS At the lower end of the price scale, for about $150 (Amazon price) you can get the Nikon Coolpix 2200 2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom http://digital-camera.review-center.com/catalog/product.php?ASIN=B0001ARH0U This is a really good 2 MP camera, though with a 2 MP camera you really can't print any pix over 8x10 max (and that's pushing it a bit).
or at about the same price (about $140), check out the HP PhotoSmart 635 2.1 MP Digital Camera w/3x Optical http://digital-camera.review-center.com/catalog/product.php?ASIN=B0000A602Q
CHEAPEST If you want a really cheap digital camera that works OK and should do great for your for your eBay photos, adequate snapshots, etc., for about $75 you can get the Kodak EasyShare CX6200 2MP Digital Camera http://digital-camera.review-center.com/catalog/product.php?ASIN=B0000ACXZU
The Review-Center.com site has reviews from other customers, so you can read through them and see what they have to say about their experiences with the camera, and the site is quite user-friendly, with Buyer's Guides to give you the basics.
Regarding your PC and Windows98, most of these cameras should work with windows98 as long as you have a USB connection. If you'll want to print photos you can also look into getting a printer that you can put the camera media directly into the printer.
I had Windows 98 for a long time, and I don't know if it was my computer in particular, but finally I broke down and bought a new Dell with Windows XP, and I have to say that computing is SO much less frustrating now that I have a more up-to-date system.
Maybe next purchase can be a new computer! Dell often offers special deals on computer/monitor packages. I got mine with a Pentium processor, CD RW, etc. for only $399 + a nice little 15" flat panel monitor for an extra $200. Hope this helps!
-Scott
> Hi, > I'm thinking of buying a digital camera and was wondering what should I look [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Thanks, > kc
|
|
|