Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / General Topics / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Buying Digital Camera Ques

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BMC - 27 Sep 2004 18:55 GMT
Hi,
I'm thinking of buying a digital camera and was wondering what should I look
for in a DC and also what system requirements on my PC do I need ?  I'm
completely new to this so any input would be appreciated.  I'm not looking
for anything fancy; just a camera I can use for my eBay selling and
occasional trip.  (I will never part with my manual SLR.  :))

I recently saw a Konica w/1.2 pixel, 4.8mm for about USD$70, i think.  Is
that good?

BTW, my PC runs on Windows 98.

Thanks,
kc
BillB - 27 Sep 2004 23:00 GMT
>  I'm not looking
> for anything fancy; just a camera I can use for my eBay selling and
> occasional trip.  (I will never part with my manual SLR.  :))
>
> I recently saw a Konica w/1.2 pixel, 4.8mm for about USD$70, i think.  Is
> that good?

 That's probably more than adequate for eBay pictures, but compared
to your SLR you may be very disappointed by quality of the travel
pictures it takes as well as how it takes them.  For example, most
older, cheaper digital cameras have a significant delay between the
time you press the shutter release and when the picture is actually
taken, so you may not get what you want when taking pictures of
moving objects.  For learning to use DCs it's probably ok and will
also allow you to not only familiarize yourself with digital camera
and their quirks, but computer software as well.  Then, in a year or
three if you feel like it's time to get a better camera, you'll be
more knowledgeable and in a better position to avoid making costly
mistake choosing the wrong camera with the wrong set of features.
And if you aren't expecting too much from the Konica, it may be good
choice.  If the Konica is used though, I'd want to make sure it can
be powered by inexpensive NiMH rechargeable AA batteries.  If it
uses a proprietary rechargeable battery that may be nearing the end
of its useful life, another battery might cost almost as much as the
camera!

> BTW, my PC runs on Windows 98.

 That's fine.  I generally use Win95 to work with my digital
pictures.  If the Konica is old enough, it may use a serial cable
instead of USB to transfer pictures to the computer, in which case
you'd want to get an inexpensive USB card reader to transfer
pictures to the computer.
Marvin Margoshes - 28 Sep 2004 18:03 GMT
> Hi,
> I'm thinking of buying a digital camera and was wondering what should I
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Thanks,
> kc

This camera won't be very god even for trips.  It will only let you make
fairly small prints.  But it may let you get a little experience with
digital photography that will help you decide on what kind of good digicam
to get.  On the other hand, it might turn you off on digital photography
before oyu see what a good digicam can do.

Digital photography isn't a complete replacement for film photography, but
it does have many advantages.  You see the result quickly, which helps to
learn how to take even better photos.  And since there is essentially no
cost per photo unless you decide to print it, you are likely to take many
more photos.

As for the PC requirements, almost any PC will do for the small image files
from the Konica you mention.  Beyond that, it depends on what kind of image
editing you will do.  Simple steps like cropping don't demand much from the
PC, but affordable software will let you do pretty much whatever you can do
in a darkroom, and quite a bit more.  The more advanced image editors need a
fast processor, lost of memory, and a good display.
BMC - 29 Sep 2004 01:39 GMT
Thanks for the posts.

Do I need a minimum amount of RAM on my PC?

~~~~~~~~~~

> > Hi,
> > I'm thinking of buying a digital camera and was wondering what should I
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> in a darkroom, and quite a bit more.  The more advanced image editors need a
> fast processor, lost of memory, and a good display.
dj_nme - 29 Sep 2004 08:58 GMT
> Thanks for the posts.
>
> Do I need a minimum amount of RAM on my PC?

My motto with computer memory is "buy as much as you can afford".
With RAM, more is usual better (except in special cases, like Windows
95, 98 and 98SE, where the maximum they can handle is 512Mb).

HTH

--
Tua materis caligulas gerit!
Randall Ainsworth - 29 Sep 2004 14:07 GMT
In article
<415a6b5c$0$26024$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>, dj_nme

> My motto with computer memory is "buy as much as you can afford".
> With RAM, more is usual better (except in special cases, like Windows
> 95, 98 and 98SE, where the maximum they can handle is 512Mb).

Actually, Windows 9x won't use much beyond 128MB effectively.
D.R. - 30 Sep 2004 05:41 GMT
> In article
> <415a6b5c$0$26024$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>, dj_nme
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Actually, Windows 9x won't use much beyond 128MB effectively.

Actually Windows 98SE runs great with 512MB. Any more RAM, then you have to
change some of the Win98 system settings to get it to work. I notice big
differences when 3D gaming having the 512MB. Anything less than 256MB is not
great for games, even on 98. I would imagine Photoshop would be the same. I use
PSP7 and the extra RAM is much needed.

D.R.
Randall Ainsworth - 30 Sep 2004 14:25 GMT
> Actually Windows 98SE runs great with 512MB. Any more RAM, then you have to
> change some of the Win98 system settings to get it to work. I notice big
> differences when 3D gaming having the 512MB. Anything less than 256MB is not
> great for games, even on 98. I would imagine Photoshop would be the same. I
> use
> PSP7 and the extra RAM is much needed.

I didn't say that it wouldn't work, but Windows 9x will not use much
beyond 128MB very effectively.
Marvin Margoshes - 29 Sep 2004 16:54 GMT
> Thanks for the posts.
>
> Do I need a minimum amount of RAM on my PC?

In most PCs, Windows uses a part of the hard drive when it runs out of RAM.
That slows down the processing, but it lets the job
get done.  Memory is cheap, and it is often the most effective way to
improve PC performance.

> ~~~~~~~~~~
>>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> a
>> fast processor, lost of memory, and a good display.
Scott - 29 Sep 2004 21:12 GMT
For your needs you should get a Point-and-Shoot digital camera -- at
the very minimum 2 megapixel (though you can only really print small
picture). 3 MP would be better. For anything worth taking with you on
your travels, you'll have to spend at least $150-200 for something
good.

You can find reviews of different digital cameras by category (for
example, Budget Buyer, Traveler, Point-and-Shoot, etc), and read what
other camera owners have to say about each camera at:

http://www.Review-Center.com

GREAT VALUE
If price is not as much of a constraint for you, get the Canon
PowerShot A75 3.2MP Digital Camera with 3X Optical Zoom for about
$225. I would say that a 3 MP camera is much better than a 2 MP camera
if you're going to take the camera on vacations.
http://digital-camera.review-center.com/catalog/product.php?ASIN=B0001G6U4S

CHEAPER CAMERAS
At the lower end of the price scale, for about $150 (Amazon price) you
can get the Nikon Coolpix 2200 2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom
http://digital-camera.review-center.com/catalog/product.php?ASIN=B0001ARH0U
This is a really good 2 MP camera, though with a 2 MP camera you
really can't print any pix over 8x10 max (and that's pushing it a
bit).

or at about the same price (about $140), check out the HP PhotoSmart
635 2.1 MP Digital Camera w/3x Optical
http://digital-camera.review-center.com/catalog/product.php?ASIN=B0000A602Q

CHEAPEST
If you want a really cheap digital camera that works OK and should do
great for your for your eBay photos, adequate snapshots, etc., for
about $75 you can get the Kodak EasyShare CX6200 2MP Digital Camera
http://digital-camera.review-center.com/catalog/product.php?ASIN=B0000ACXZU

The Review-Center.com site has reviews from other customers, so you
can read through them and see what they have to say about their
experiences with the camera, and the site is quite user-friendly, with
Buyer's Guides to give you the basics.

Regarding your PC and Windows98, most of these cameras should work
with windows98 as long as you have a USB connection. If you'll want to
print photos you can also look into getting a printer that you can put
the camera media directly into the printer.

I had Windows 98 for a long time, and I don't know if it was my
computer in particular, but finally I broke down and bought a new Dell
with Windows XP, and I have to say that computing is SO much less
frustrating now that I have a more up-to-date system.

Maybe next purchase can be a new computer! Dell often offers special
deals on computer/monitor packages. I got mine with a Pentium
processor, CD RW, etc. for only $399 + a nice little 15" flat panel
monitor for an extra $200.
Hope this helps!

-Scott

> Hi,
> I'm thinking of buying a digital camera and was wondering what should I look
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks,
> kc
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.