Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / General Topics / March 2010

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Photos of Historical Center of Lima

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mmyvusenet - 14 Mar 2010 06:34 GMT
Hello:

I did these photos in the Historical Center of Lima

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4430468521/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4430562937/

Thanks for your technical comments about photography.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com
Charles E Hardwidge - 14 Mar 2010 15:07 GMT
> Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.

Those pictures look like a cock and a c.nt.

Something you want to tell us?

Signature

Charles E Hardwidge

Michael Cunningham - 15 Mar 2010 02:35 GMT
>> Hello:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Something you want to tell us?

Telling us a lot more about yourself than the OP Mr. Hardwidge!
Robert Coe - 16 Mar 2010 03:33 GMT
: >> Hello:
: >>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
: >
: Telling us a lot more about yourself than the OP Mr. Hardwidge!

That's just Chuck being Chuck. He doesn't really mean it.

Bob
Chris H - 16 Mar 2010 09:21 GMT
>>> Hello:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> --  Charles E Hardwidge
>Telling us a lot more about yourself than the OP Mr. Hardwidge!

I was thinking that.... a previous comment on one of the OP's other
pictures was that it looked like a mental institution. Hmmm he seems to
know about these things.

He also babbles on a pseudo Zen. Obviously some one has been trying to
teach him to help his state of mind. Unfortunately he has clearly not
understood.

I think Charles has a lot of problems. Also having seen his photos he is
no better than most of the people he criticises and worse than some.

Signature

\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills  Staffs  England     /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Charles E Hardwidge - 16 Mar 2010 18:49 GMT
> Also having seen his photos he is no better than most of the people he
> criticises and worse than some.

The photos I put up were a "warts and all" photoshoot from last year. It was
the first time I'd ever owned a camera and gone outside with it, and a whole
bunch were purely experimental or scene reference shots.

There's always twats who don't pay attention or want to keep bringing
something not current or representative up. That's usually cuz they're
scared of the competition or have something to hide.

Go f.ck yourself, asswipe.

Signature

Charles E Hardwidge

tony cooper - 16 Mar 2010 20:04 GMT
>> Also having seen his photos he is no better than most of the people he
>> criticises and worse than some.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>something not current or representative up. That's usually cuz they're
>scared of the competition or have something to hide.

Where were your entries in the Shoot-In?  No scared of a little
competition, were you?

I like that "scene reference" weasel excuse.  You were learning where
to stand if anything interesting ever passed by that corner?  

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Charles E Hardwidge - 16 Mar 2010 20:42 GMT
>>The photos I put up were a "warts and all" photoshoot from last year. It
>>was the first time I'd ever owned a camera and gone outside with it, and a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I like that "scene reference" weasel excuse.  You were learning where
> to stand if anything interesting ever passed by that corner?

You're just talking more made up crap.

When did you stop beating your wife?

Signature

Charles E Hardwidge

Chris H - 17 Mar 2010 08:35 GMT
>> Also having seen his photos he is no better than most of the people he
>> criticises and worse than some.
>
>The photos I put up were a "warts and all" photoshoot from last year. It was
>the first time I'd ever owned a camera and gone outside with it, and a whole
>bunch were purely experimental or scene reference shots.

SO you only have one years experience?  It shows. Yet you critisise
others.

>There's always twats who don't pay attention or want to keep bringing
>something not current or representative up. That's usually cuz they're
>scared of the competition or have something to hide.

Sounds like you.

Signature

\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills  Staffs  England     /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Charles E Hardwidge - 17 Mar 2010 18:58 GMT
>>The photos I put up were a "warts and all" photoshoot from last year. It
>>was the first time I'd ever owned a camera and gone outside with it, and a
>>whole bunch were purely experimental or scene reference shots.
>
> SO you only have one years experience?  It shows. Yet you critisise
> others.

You're talking smack again.

Signature

Charles E Hardwidge

Chris H - 17 Mar 2010 19:32 GMT
>>>The photos I put up were a "warts and all" photoshoot from last year. It
>>>was the first time I'd ever owned a camera and gone outside with it, and a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>You're talking smack again.

Also you were using a point and shoot.

You know about as much about photography as you do Zen.

Signature

\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills  Staffs  England     /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Charles E Hardwidge - 17 Mar 2010 21:23 GMT
>>>>The photos I put up were a "warts and all" photoshoot from last year. It
>>>>was the first time I'd ever owned a camera and gone outside with it, and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> You know about as much about photography as you do Zen.

You're talking smack again.

Signature

Charles E Hardwidge

Albert Ross - 17 Mar 2010 20:52 GMT
>> Hello:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Something you want to tell us?

<splutter>
ColinD - 16 Mar 2010 10:27 GMT
> Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> MMYV
> http://www.mmyv.com 

Just snapshots, I'm afraid.  Bad news to cut off the bottom of the
buildings.  If you can't get the entire building in the shot, you need
to a) step back, b) use a wider lens, or c) take a couple shots and
stitch them.  Stitching programs abound these days.

Colin D.
Joel - 16 Mar 2010 15:10 GMT
> > Hello:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Colin D.

    I have to agree with you about the bottom part.  And to me the photos are
pretty much useless if not tasteless.  I know it won't be easy to capture a
tall, wide building or castle with very good detail.

    BUT if I need a good part of it as a background (I sometime replacing the
background) then the background (building, castle etc.) should show some or
more of the bottom.

    And about the photo, if the lense is not wide enough to capture the whole
building, or more of the building then find a Good_Angle (like around the
corner, or either start from the corner or end with the corner).  *Unless*
trying to show or collection of some special part then it's a different
story.

    BTW, I just browsed through few of the OP's gallery (around 6-7 photos)
and it seems like s/he interest in close-up.  But they are all either too
close, not good angle, or boring background etc.

    And to me, if I want to show off my photos (closeup) then I would capture
them with better camera gear (good DSLR and lens, macro lens may be
necessary for close-up), and paying a little for a better photo-hosting web
(for larger and more detail photos).
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.