>>> Would using a zoom lens on a DSLR camera create dust on the sensor
>>> merely by focusing??
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I think it means the dirts get sucked inside the lens (other side of the
> glass), and I think Canon 100-400mm (?) is one of few Canon Push<->Pull lens
That happens to prime lenses also.

Signature
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com
all google groups messages filtered due to spam
>>> Would using a zoom lens on a DSLR camera create dust on the sensor
>>> merely by focusing??
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> the glass), and I think Canon 100-400mm (?) is one of few Canon
> Push<->Pull lens
I have a few fairly old lenses for my Praktica SLR, and on two of those
there's dust trapped within the lens assembly itself.
I had always assumed that the previous owner had dismantled them and got
dust into them, but now I realise it was more likely to be be the result of
pneumatic suction.

Signature
http://www.SavePentney.co.uk
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Save-Pentney
Joel - 22 May 2008 00:58 GMT
"\(not quite so\) Fat Sam" <samandjanet@knox.orangehome.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> Would using a zoom lens on a DSLR camera create dust on the sensor
> >>> merely by focusing??
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> dust into them, but now I realise it was more likely to be be the result of
> pneumatic suction.
I don't own none of those Push/Pull lens but that is what I have heard
from quite afew owners who warn other about the design.
Robert Coe - 25 May 2008 23:17 GMT
On Wed, 21 May 2008 20:35:40 +0100, "\(not quite so\) Fat Sam"
<samandjanet@knox.orangehome.co.uk> wrote:
: I have a few fairly old lenses for my Praktica SLR, and on two of those
: there's dust trapped within the lens assembly itself.
: I had always assumed that the previous owner had dismantled them and got
: dust into them, but now I realise it was more likely to be be the result
: of pneumatic suction.
Or maybe clean rooms weren't as good at the time the lens was manufactured and
the dust has been there from the beginning.
Bob
krishnananda - 26 May 2008 01:39 GMT
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 20:35:40 +0100, "\(not quite so\) Fat Sam"
> <samandjanet@knox.orangehome.co.uk> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Bob
Lenses are not sealed against dust infiltration. Zoom lenses are more
prone than primes due to more elements moving through longer distances,
displacing a greater volume of air. Large-format lenses have never been
sealed as they have to be disassembled for attachment.
Dust on the rear element is more of a problem than dust on internal
elements.