Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / General Topics / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Photo Classes or NOT?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jroush@roushstudios.com - 19 May 2008 00:10 GMT
Should I take Photography Classes?
This is a question I see on all the major sites in the "question &
answer" areas. Oh Yahoo questions there are always nurmerous posts
about this topic. Well, here's my take on it...and even though I'm an
online photography  instructor (http://www.roushphotoonline.com) I'll
try to give an unbiased opinion.
Through the years I've taught students at many different skill levels,
lots of amatuers and a fair amount of "wanna be pros". The thing that
is common among all of them is the their lack of the right knowledge
to grow photographically.. It's not that they can't expose properly,
it's not that they can't operate the camera. Knowing how to use all
the components that are available to us and how to apply them to
different shooting situations, different lighting environments, and
effectively delivering a message in a visual format is where the "lack
of knowledge" becomes evident. Most studentes look at a pro
photographers photos and say "I want to do that!". Well, to DO "that"
it takes a very complete understanding of lens choice, speed choice,
Depth of Field choice, and then be able put this together in a
properly and powerfully composed visual layout and design that impacts
the viewer.
That's where most photographs fail. When I critique portfolios, and I
critique hundreds, it's always the same ... the same reasons and
problems in the execution of the principles of design in photography.
So, yes, photography classes will enlighten you to things you might
not know about, and things you need to do each time you shoot, and
important things you need to think about when doing photography.

Jeff Roush / instructor
RoushPhotoOnline
http://www.roushphotoonline.com - online photography classes and
courses.
Joel - 19 May 2008 13:32 GMT
> Should I take Photography Classes?
> This is a question I see on all the major sites in the "question &
> answer" areas. Oh Yahoo questions there are always nurmerous posts
> about this topic. Well, here's my take on it...and even though I'm an

<snip>

    I do think Photography class does help and a good idea, and I would
recomment something like local Community College over online.
jimkramer - 19 May 2008 13:50 GMT
>> Should I take Photography Classes?
>> This is a question I see on all the major sites in the "question &
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I do think Photography class does help and a good idea, and I would
> recomment something like local Community College over online.

Seconded. (especially over some yahoo that needs to advertise his classes on
Usenet)  Even though most of the instructors I had at the local community
colleges were generally incompetent; I learned a lot, mostly about how not
to teach though. :-)  The biggest issue is the diversity of student levels
you have at a community college photography class, which to be blunt, I
found frustrating.  Instead of learning I wound up teaching.  The cash flow
seemed wrong from that stand point...
-Jim
tony cooper - 19 May 2008 14:31 GMT
>>> Should I take Photography Classes?
>>> This is a question I see on all the major sites in the "question &
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>seemed wrong from that stand point...
>-Jim

I attended a macro photography class this past weekend.  I hesitate to
call it a "class", though,  since it was put on by a member of a
camera club, and he is not an instructor; just a member who does a lot
of macro work.

He provided some useful tips on macro photography.  Also, he brought
along an extensive array of equipment and gadgetry that I had not seen
"up close and personal".   It was interesting to actually handle, look
through, and see the results of some things that I've seen advertised
but never tried.  He also used some lighting techniques that I'd not
considered before.

Some of the useful tips that I came away with came from other members
of the club.  Things that came up during the presentation and in the
critique following the presentation.  (The meeting was held in a
nature park, and - after the presentation part - we all went out and
took some shots to be reviewed later.)

These live lessons are better, in my opinion, than any online course
because of the interaction of the group and the ability to handle
equipment.  

 
Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

RoushStudios - 19 May 2008 16:07 GMT
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 08:50:51 -0400, "jimkramer"
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Tony,
I have to agree.  THere is nothing like a hands-on classroom/group
environment to learn.
I teach College level Digital Photogrpahy and certainly understand the
benefits of that.  For someone limited on time
an online class is the next best option.  Online classes differ in
many ways however.  I keep the student / teacher relationship
at the forefront, feeling that making it more of a one-on-one
situation allows the for a better focused situation for the student.
Joel - 19 May 2008 18:36 GMT
> >>> Should I take Photography Classes?
> >>> This is a question I see on all the major sites in the "question &
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> because of the interaction of the group and the ability to handle
> equipment.  

    Live lessons and many different techniques from different students with
many different backgrounds are the great benefit of regular class over
online class.

    About Macro Photography, I am not an expert on macro photography but do
have some macro gear as well as I do enjoy macro images.  The problem that I
am a little too old (and have had foot problem in the past 2 years) to carry
heavy tripod to photograph tiny insect as little as the tip of a toothpick.
tony cooper - 19 May 2008 19:59 GMT
>> >>> Should I take Photography Classes?
>> >>> This is a question I see on all the major sites in the "question &
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>am a little too old (and have had foot problem in the past 2 years) to carry
>heavy tripod to photograph tiny insect as little as the tip of a toothpick.

At the session I attended, the equipment the club members had ranged
from simple to extensive.  One guy was shooting with a tripod that
could have supported a VW Beetle and with a precision rail attached.
One guy was shooting with a bean bag and manually focussing.  

The problem with the tripod and rail was that it took him too long to
set up.  The subject, if it was alive, was long-gone before he was
ready to fire the shutter.  He did best with flowers and inanimate
objects.  The bean bag guy could flop down and snap off a shot of a
mobile subject like a Damsel Fly.  

The best tripod for field work seems to be a Gorilla pod
http://www.joby.com/ because it's light, sets up quickly, and can be
carried attached to the camera and the photographer can still shoot
hand-held.  Not so good, though, when the subject is too far off the
ground and there's nothing near to wind it around.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Joel - 19 May 2008 20:38 GMT
<snip>
> >> I attended a macro photography class this past weekend.  I hesitate to
> >> call it a "class", though,  since it was put on by a member of a
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> hand-held.  Not so good, though, when the subject is too far off the
> ground and there's nothing near to wind it around.

    Well, if you do macro photography on large insect (fly, dragonfly, spider,
grassshopper etc.) with fast moving then you may want to long zoom macro
like Sigma 150mm Macro which allows you to capture a large insect or object
from good distance.  But if you do macro photograph on almost non-moving
(too slow to make a big difference) like some insect you hardly be able to
see with naked eye (small as small dirt), or the distance between the object
to the lens can be more/less 1" to 1-2" etc. then not only tripod but either
multiple flashes or macro flash.

    And I don't think the Joby tripod is for me, it can be light to carry
around but I don't think it's worth the trouble for using it.  Or if the
light tripod can do the macro photograph then I would rather get some cheap
light weight tripod than dragging the big tripod along.
Joel - 19 May 2008 18:09 GMT
> >> Should I take Photography Classes?
> >> This is a question I see on all the major sites in the "question &
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> seemed wrong from that stand point...
> -Jim

    I don't take any photography class especially at local Community College,
but I can see what you mean.  Me? few months ago I started doing some
research about welding, and specially trying to find some place I can buy
scrap metal which is very very hard to find these days.

    And because I already have some experience with ARC stick welding (not an
experted but ok) which I haven't done much for around 25 years.  Last year I
bought a MIG welder and I am thinking of signing up for few welding class at
local Community College to have a little more practicing on MIG welding
while saving on material as well as finding place to get cheap crap metal
etc.. and I see lot of non-credit photography class.

    About Photography and Photo Retouching, I have been doing as professional
for several decades, so I don't think I can benefit much from non-credit
class.
RoushStudios - 19 May 2008 16:03 GMT
> jro...@roushstudios.com wrote:
> > Should I take Photography Classes?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>         I do think Photography class does help and a good idea, and I would
> recomment something like local Community College over online.

I do agree that there is nothing like a real classroom situation to
learn, photography or otherwise.
For those that done' thave the time an online class is the next best
option.  I also teach at a University and
completely understand the benefits of such an environment.
Peter - 20 May 2008 01:18 GMT
>> Should I take Photography Classes?
>> This is a question I see on all the major sites in the "question &
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I do think Photography class does help and a good idea, and I would
> recomment something like local Community College over online.

We agree, well almost. Some of my friends have gotten a lot out of courses
at our local community college. For someone who needs to learn fundamentals
I would highly recommend that. One might also consider joining a local
camera club. Most, mine included welcome beginners and invite you to some
down and see how comfortable you are with the members. Most of the members
are more than willing to help, provided you show some effort to show you
want to learn.

If your budget (and significant other,) permits, you might also consider an
intensive course such as the one I took last year at the Maine Media
Workshops. I am taking another workshop there this year. Other workshops are
given at different locations and you should find one that fits.

http://www.theworkshops.com/
I have no connection except that of a satisfied participant.

Signature

Peter

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.