The Orphan Works Act 2008 - Bad for Artists, Photographers, Creatives
Everywhere
How would you like to be required to register all of your artistic
work with a private body in order to avoid the risk of being
designated "orphan" and open for use by anyone? The Orphan Works Act,
introduced this year and intended to be fast-tracked through Congress,
aims to have this happen.
This bill can make any and all creative work not registered with a
Government-approved private body completely vulnerable to being taken
and used in any way, by anyone, with the onus on the creator of
copyrighted work to find the infringer, rather than being protected by
default as it is now.
This bill is ominous and scary for creatives anywhere. And by summer
it will be law unless it is stopped.
Read more
http://www.epuk.org/Opinion/848/uncle-sams-thieves-charter?pg=2
http://copyrightaction.com/forum/orphan-works-bills-introduced-in-usa
And ACT. CONTACT YOUR LEGISLATOR:
Visit
http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml
To quickly find the phone number, address, e-mail of every U.S.
Senator, U.S. Representative, Governor and State Legislator. PLEASE BE
POLITE AND CONSTRUCTIVE. Threats only work against us artists. We need
to make a professional impression to be taken seriously.
Make yourself be heard. Protect your creations. Every voice counts and
so does your right to control your own creations. YOU NEED TO WRITE
LETTERS NOW!
We only have a few days to make ourselves heard, as the Senate and
House will only allow a short time for comments. Call them, send e-
mails and fax letters.
If you don't prove you care about your work, the Congressmen and
Senators who WORK FOR US won't care either. Show them you care!
Chris H - 03 May 2008 14:14 GMT
In message
<c9456897-e55c-404d-adf4-4dda0724c9c7@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
darrenholmes99@gmail.com writes
> The Orphan Works Act 2008 - Bad for Artists, Photographers, Creatives
>Everywhere
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>copyrighted work to find the infringer, rather than being protected by
>default as it is now.
I can't see this being a problem. It only has effect in the US.
Any US firm using pictures in this way would render it's UK office (or
any other office around the world) liable to prosecution for breach of
copyright.
If the company does not have a local office the moment anyone from the
US office sets foot outside the US they can be prosecuted for breach of
copyright
Therefore effectively the only people who can uses the works are
Americans working for US only companies with staff who never want to
leave the US...
It will soon deter most users of "orphaned" art as, after the first few
prosecutions, many companies will not want to take the risk with it.
Tying up staff and corporate lawyers for eve a few days is going to cost
more than the cost of the licensing of the photos.
Especially as the rest of the world will then probably start ignoring
all the US copyrights etc
I can see the estate of Elvis, Getty and a few others getting worried as
they have global brands. It he US pushes this through and the rest of
the world starts ignoring the US copyrights. :-)

Signature
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Michael - 03 May 2008 22:50 GMT
> The Orphan Works Act 2008 - Bad for Artists, Photographers, Creatives
> Everywhere
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> If you don't prove you care about your work, the Congressmen and
> Senators who WORK FOR US won't care either. Show them you care!
I wonder what our intrepid would be Presidents, Mr Obama Mr McCain and
Ms Rodham-Clinton have to say about this and how each will vote on it?

Signature
Michael