>>>> Short answer: No
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> It certainly does not produce a crisp or tack sharp image.
Samples vary. My made in Japan very early one is absolutely excelent at all
focal lengths. And produces very very sharp images at 50mm even compared
directly to the 1.4 50mm lense I used for a comparisson. At 100 percent or
more on screen I cannot see any difference at f8 at all. Even contrast is
the same. Other than the less than smooth out of focus areas. A portrait
lense its not. My brother and a freind both have made in Thailand ones. This
may or may not be significant but... One is soft everywhere in comparison
and its very noticible, and the other is softer at the 200 end. Most
complaints of it being soft are at the middle of the range. Seems to be a
lot of variability. Test before you buy!
> I am told that on the D300 its performance is much better.
It is. I swapped my 200 for a 300 as soon as I could get one. At least at
the wide end.
Zero chromatic aberration (on all lenses due to the in camera jpg processing
that magically removes it) and it focusses faster too.
> To deviate, I don't think is is a true 200. When I compare images taken
> with a straight 200 at close focus, the images from the 18-200 seem much
> smaller.
Its 200 at infinity and yes about 175(?) on close ups. You can see image
size change if you manually focus from one end to the other
Peter - 10 May 2008 19:03 GMT
>>>>> Short answer: No
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Its 200 at infinity and yes about 175(?) on close ups. You can see image
> size change if you manually focus from one end to the other
Thanks for the info. Since I live about 10 minutes from the Nikon repair
facility, I will bring it in next week. In the past they have been pretty
fair, which is one of the reasons I have stuck with Nikon.

Signature
Peter
Burgerman - 22 May 2008 18:41 GMT
>>>>>> Short answer: No
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>> Its 200 at infinity and yes about 175(?) on close ups. You can see image
>> size change if you manually focus from one end to the other
> Thanks for the info. Since I live about 10 minutes from the Nikon repair
> facility, I will bring it in next week. In the past they have been pretty
> fair, which is one of the reasons I have stuck with Nikon.
An example, a duck (maybe!) shot while dog walking handheld from a
wheelchair in the wind. Its cropped and its slightly oversharpened for
printing.
But this is at the 200 (300 really) end at 200th sec. Its suposedly softest
at the 200 end. It would have been sharper still at f8 and on a tripod with
mirror lock up of course. Mine seems as good everywhere 18 to 200 to my eyes
its not soft at all. The samples from the one tested by dpreview are dismal!
That one should have been sent bacl.. This is the made in japan one but I
doubt that makes it any better that the made in thailand one. .
http://www.cordeaux.net/duck_cropped.jpg
Paul Furman - 23 May 2008 17:36 GMT
>>>>>>> Short answer: No
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> An example, a duck (maybe!)
Yikes, your duck has shark teeth!
> shot while dog walking handheld from a
> wheelchair in the wind. Its cropped and its slightly oversharpened for
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> http://www.cordeaux.net/duck_cropped.jpg

Signature
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com
all google groups messages filtered due to spam
Burgerman - 23 May 2008 20:50 GMT
>>>>>>>> Short answer: No
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Yikes, your duck has shark teeth!
Yes I noticed those too.
>> shot while dog walking handheld from a wheelchair in the wind. Its
>> cropped and its slightly oversharpened for printing.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>> http://www.cordeaux.net/duck_cropped.jpg