> At the moment I am currently using a Nikon D100, I am looking to upgrade
> would love a D3 however they are a bit out of my price range at the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Cheers
> Laura
Buy one. Its the best camera out there other than the D3.
The only real difference is the D3s exeptional high ISO noise.
I sold a D200 to buy mine and its in a different league. Read:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
http://www.bythom.com/nikond300review.htm
http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/811
> At the moment I am currently using a Nikon D100, I am looking to upgrade
> would love a D3 however they are a bit out of my price range at the moment,
> so I was looking at a D300. I would love some opinions on the D300, or some
> advice on another suitable camera. I primarily take sporting images.
> Cheers
> Laura
I am not Nikon user, but have read that Nikon has finally released a
better digital camera Nikon D300 which is better with NOISE at high ISO. And
if you don't have lot of money invested on good Nikon lens, then I would
suggest to look at Canon system which is usually cheaper than Nikon. Example
the Canon 40D many people compare it with Nikon D300 but about 1/2 the
price, same with lens system. And Canon has always handled low-ight lot
better than Nikon.
Also, point your browser to web page like www.dpreview.com to read more
about Nikon D300 and others (if) you want to compare Nikon D300 with
other's).
JJ - 06 May 2008 23:56 GMT
>> At the moment I am currently using a Nikon D100, I am looking to upgrade
>> would love a D3 however they are a bit out of my price range at the
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> about Nikon D300 and others (if) you want to compare Nikon D300 with
> other's).
I know what you mean about the Canon models having less noise than the Nikon
models, but although I like Canon pics myself, there is something surreal
about their 'clean' images. All that noise-free photo stuff can sometimes
make a photo look quite 'bland' and give it a flat look at times, whereas
the higher noise levels in the Nikons seem to contribute something to the
overall look and 'feel' of the picture. There's a sort of more realistic,
textured look to the Nikon shots and I particularly like this in portraits
where skin and hair shows up looking so natural. It is also very evident in
landscapes where we see the likes of rocks etc.,. I also prefer to see the
'grain' in the Nikon skys, especially blue skies, whereas the Canon is very
pure and creamy. I am not a techie photographer, so don't have the knowledge
to word this any other way, but these are the things I notice when comparing
the two makes of camera.
I do like both makes, but they are just different....'not
better....'different.
J.