Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / General Topics / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Question on Camera body vs Camera Lens features

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Eichler34 - 26 Nov 2007 20:28 GMT
I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids sports.
After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax K10D are
the choices for my budget.  The Pentax appears to be noticabally superior
when it comes to specs, but a manager of a camera shop explained it's better
to have lenses that take care of all your needs when it comes to auto-focus,
and image stabilization.  Therefore he felt buying a Nikon with lesser body
specs is the way to go (D40x), as long as I get a VR lens (about $700-$750
for a 50-200mm).

Until this conversation, I was 100% set on the Pentax, so I was hoping the
following questions could be answered:

1.  Can an amazing lens compensate for lack of body features, and compared
to Pentax, are the Nikon lenses that much better?

2.  If you have great body features such as image stabilization and 11 point
autofocus, does that compensate for a good lens that doesn't have those
features?

3.  If I were to get the Pentax with the great body features, and a Pentax
lens with the same features, does that have a compound effect and make
sports shots that much more superior?  i.e.  Does having stabilization in
the camera and in the lens mean I now have super stabilization, or is it
unnecessary to have it in both?

Any responses would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks,

-John
ray - 26 Nov 2007 21:24 GMT
> I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids sports.
> After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax K10D are
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> the camera and in the lens mean I now have super stabilization, or is it
> unnecessary to have it in both?

I don't know, never having tried that, but I would suspect they might
fight each other. It is often recommended to turn IS off when you use a
tripod.

> Any responses would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks,
>
> -John
Joel - 26 Nov 2007 22:22 GMT
> I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids sports.
> After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax K10D are
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> specs is the way to go (D40x), as long as I get a VR lens (about $700-$750
> for a 50-200mm).

    Don't rush else you may end up spending more for less.  I would suggest to
spend at least 4-6 months with lot of reading to have the idea what you are
getting yourself into, or try to dig as much information as possible.  Or
try to read *both* GOOD/BAD sides before spending the money.

    Or try to think of the whole SYSTEM instead of any specific body or brand.
So, if you interest in Nikon (or Nikon D40) then point your browser to some
web page like www.dpreview.com or www.steves-digicams.com (I think it's the
correct name as I saw it few days ago), and join the Nikon FORUM to read and
learn more about it.

> Until this conversation, I was 100% set on the Pentax, so I was hoping the
> following questions could be answered:
>
> 1.  Can an amazing lens compensate for lack of body features, and compared
> to Pentax, are the Nikon lenses that much better?

    This type of question shouldn't be asked <bg>, because you either don't
get the right answer, no answer, or wrong answer.  Or a cheap P&S with right
lighting and setting could easily beat expensive DSLR body with cheap poor
lens and wrong setting.

> 2.  If you have great body features such as image stabilization and 11 point
> autofocus, does that compensate for a good lens that doesn't have those
> features?

    Yes and No, I haven't seen any body has built-in IS (have heard some) to
start with, and I have never done any research about those.  Cuz to me it
isn't an important part, or I don't have much time to waste on wishful
thing, or easier way out.

> 3.  If I were to get the Pentax with the great body features, and a Pentax
> lens with the same features, does that have a compound effect and make
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Any responses would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks,

    I have never read anything about Pentax, never owned any Nikon etc.. but I
have a feeling that you are more interesting about $$$$ than building a
camera system.

    I can tell you that going for DSLR is not going to be expensive, but you
will need lot more than just Pentax vs Nikon.  Here is a general answer

- Get a GOOD LENS to go with the body.  For the lens you may want to check
with www.fredmiranda.com REVIEWS to read the end users' feedbacks.  And
depending on the body, sometime the lens will cost more than body.

    And if you want good IQ (Image Quality) and more chance to capture sharp,
clean image then Good Fast Lens is the way to go.  And a top-notch xx-200
lens you may be looking at around $1000-1700 (for example).

> -John

    You said you have done lot of research, but to me you will need to do much
more, and don't pay much attention to wishful thing but whatever system you
try to build.
Pat - 26 Nov 2007 22:32 GMT
On Nov 26, 3:28 pm, "Eichler34" <john.eich...@comcast.net_nospam>
wrote:
> I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids sports.
> After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax K10D are
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> -John

As antidotal information, it appears the Canon uses like their
Canons.  Nikon users really like their Nikons.  But Pentax users LOVE
their Pentaxs.  I don't know if it's the counter cultural thing or the
egronomics or the interface, but Pentax users are a breed apart and
have much more love of their equipment than either Nikon or Canon
users.

If you look around, you are probably likely to find used pentax glass
at a more reasonable price than used Nikon that will fit a newer
camera.

If you're not tied into another line, then don't be afraid of Pentax
just because it isn't Nikon.
Mr. Strat - 26 Nov 2007 22:47 GMT
In article
<3dcaa7b6-1218-4551-a1ff-87868269cc30@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,

> As antidotal information, it appears the Canon uses like their
> Canons.  Nikon users really like their Nikons.  But Pentax users LOVE
> their Pentaxs.  I don't know if it's the counter cultural thing or the
> egronomics or the interface, but Pentax users are a breed apart and
> have much more love of their equipment than either Nikon or Canon
> users.

Maybe they don't know any better.
dadiOH - 27 Nov 2007 09:01 GMT
> On Nov 26, 3:28 pm, "Eichler34" <john.eich...@comcast.net_nospam>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> breed apart and have much more love of their equipment than either
> Nikon or Canon users.

That's because they have always been innovative and made good stuff.
Even when they were Asahi.

My general feeling (and experience over 50+ years) is that 90% of
those who buy Nikon/Canon/Hasselblad do so because of name
recognition.

Signature

dadiOH
____________________________

dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
...a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico

Celcius - 27 Nov 2007 12:09 GMT
>> On Nov 26, 3:28 pm, "Eichler34" <john.eich...@comcast.net_nospam>
>> wrote:
> My general feeling (and experience over 50+ years) is that 90% of
> those who buy Nikon/Canon/Hasselblad do so because of name
> recognition.

dadiOH,
What experience?
Why 90%, not 89%... or 91% ???
Based on what? The facts? Give us the facts!
There are owners who bought a make because of price.
There are those who buy because they get 2 lenses with the deal.
There are those who buy because they already have the lenses.
There are those who buy through strong recommendations from a friend,
family, etc.
I could go on and on...
By the way, 50+ is not a measure in any way.
There is this saying which goes thus: There is no fool like an OLD fool
;-)))))))
I bought my first camera in 1959 (Pentax). I don't even remember why. I was
21 at the time. That doesn't make me an expert in anything, not even
cameras.
Take care Ole man ;-)
Marcel
Chris Hills - 27 Nov 2007 12:49 GMT
>>> On Nov 26, 3:28 pm, "Eichler34" <john.eich...@comcast.net_nospam>
>>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Why 90%, not 89%... or 91% ???
>Based on what? The facts? Give us the facts!

I think he is right. Many will by the brand leaders because of the
name/reputation.   It is the same in any field.

This is not to say the other makes are not good.

With cameras it is as much the camera you feel physically happy using as
much as the spec or the name.

That said there is a certain quality of lens you don't want to drop
below (all we would all be using 6Mp camera phones :- )
Signature

\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills  Staffs  England     /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org      www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

dadiOH - 27 Nov 2007 14:18 GMT
>>> On Nov 26, 3:28 pm, "Eichler34" <john.eich...@comcast.net_nospam>
>>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>  dadiOH,

> What experience?

Observing people buy things when they had nary a clue as to *why* they
were buying it or even what they wanted.

If you'd like to acquire vast experience quickly, go camp out in an
electronics store for a while.
______________

> Why 90%, not 89%... or 91% ???

Pure conjecture. In hindsight, I was probably too low.
________________

> Based on what? The facts? Give us the facts!

See above.
_______________

> There are owners who bought a make because of price.

Insecure and unknowledgeable.
______________

> There are those who buy because they get 2 lenses with the deal.

Cheapskates
_______________

> There are those who buy because they already have the lenses.

Frugal
______________

> There are those who buy through strong recommendations from a
> friend, family, etc.

Idiots
_______________

> By the way, 50+ is not a measure in any way.
> There is this saying which goes thus: There is no fool like an OLD
> fool ;-)))))))

But they have more experience which is something young ones lack  :)
________________

> I bought my first camera in 1959 (Pentax).

So I beat you by a couple of decades.  A shame you missed mechanical
syncronization.  And ASA (ISO) 10 color film.
________________

> I don't even remember
> why. I was 21 at the time.

My guess would be marketing hype.  Or on advice of a friend :)
__________________

> That doesn't make me an expert in
> anything, not even cameras.

Keep trying, you'll get there.
_________________

> Take care Ole man ;-)

You too, kiddo  :)

Signature

dadiOH
____________________________

dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
...a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico

Celcius - 27 Nov 2007 18:45 GMT
>>>> On Nov 26, 3:28 pm, "Eichler34" <john.eich...@comcast.net_nospam>
>>>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>
> You too, kiddo  :)

dadiOH
I have to admit, you made me laugh.
I love one liners!
Have a great week.
Marcel
dadiOH - 28 Nov 2007 11:27 GMT
> dadiOH
> I have to admit, you made me laugh.
> I love one liners!
> Have a great week.
> Marcel

:)

Signature

dadiOH
____________________________

dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
...a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico

Joel - 27 Nov 2007 14:43 GMT
<snip>
> > As antidotal information, it appears the Canon uses like their
> > Canons.  Nikon users really like their Nikons.  But Pentax users
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> those who buy Nikon/Canon/Hasselblad do so because of name
> recognition.

    Neah! the pros those buy Canon and Nikon because of religion <bg>
Celcius - 27 Nov 2007 18:41 GMT
> <snip>
>> > As antidotal information, it appears the Canon uses like their
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Neah! the pros those buy Canon and Nikon because of religion <bg>

Joel,
I guess you're right, but I thought there was only one God?
Now, you've got to tell us which is which ;-)))
Marcel
Joel - 27 Nov 2007 20:28 GMT
> > <snip>
> >> > As antidotal information, it appears the Canon uses like their
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Now, you've got to tell us which is which ;-)))
> Marcel

    Well, may be there is only one God (I visited her years ago <bg>), but you
know we have multi religions.  Matter fact, we have too many religions
causing religious war for centuries and still exist these days <bg>
Cats - 27 Nov 2007 21:31 GMT
<snip>
> Now, you've got to tell us which is which ;-)))

Or witch is witch...
Celcius - 26 Nov 2007 23:04 GMT
> I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids
> sports. After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> -John,
How about an Olympus 510?
It's well rated, has stabilization within its body as well as quite a lot of
goodies* :
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse510/
and sometimes, you get 2 lenses at one shot :-)
Marcel

_______________________________________
 a.. 10 Megapixels Digital SLR Camera
 b.. 2.5 inch HyperCrystal LCD screen
 c.. Live MOS Sensor
 d.. Imager shift image stabilizer
 e.. 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 Zuiko Digital Lens
 f.. Sequential shooting speed - Approx. 3 frames/sec.
 g.. Live View - Live-MOS Sensor for still picture shooting is used, 100%
field of view, Exposure adjustment pre-view, White balance adjustment
pre-view, Grid line displayable, 7x/10x magnification possible, MF/S-AF, AF
frame display, AF point display, Shooting information, Histogram, IS
activating mode, Heat warning
 h.. Dust reduction - Supersonic Wave Filter (dust reduction system for
image sensor)
 i.. Picture Mode - Vivid, Natural, Muted, Monotone (default setting:
Natural)
 j.. Picture tone - Sepia, Blue, Purple or Green tone available for
Monotone
 k.. Metering system - TTL open-aperture metering system: Digital ESP
metering (49-point multi pattern metering), Centre weighted average
metering, Spot metering (approx. 1% for the viewfinder screen), Spot with
Highlight control, Spot with Shadow control
 l.. Exposure mode - Auto, Program AE, Aperture priority AE, Shutter
priority AE, Manual, Scene program AE, Scene select AE
 m.. Memory - CompactFlash Type I/II, Microdrive, xD-Picture Card
(Dual-Slot)
 n.. Recording format - DCF, DPOF compatible/Exif, PRINT Image Matching III
 o.. File format - RAW (12-bit), JPEG, RAW+JPEG
 p.. Scene program AE Portrait, Landscape, Macro, Sport, Night + Portrait
 q.. JPEG editing - Monotone, Sepia, Red-eye reduction, Saturation (color
depth), Resize (producing another file)
 r.. Print function - Print reservation (DPOF), Direct print (PictBridge
compatible)
 s.. PC interface - USB 2.0 High Speed for storage and camera control (MTP
mode is available)
 t.. Power Requirements - BLM-1 Li-ion battery (included)
 u.. Dimensions - 5.35 in.(W) x 3.6 in. (W) x 2.67in. (D) / 136 mm (W) x
91.5 mm (H) x 68 mm (D) (excluding protrusions)
 v.. Weight - 16.2 oz. / 460 g (body only)
dj_nme - 26 Nov 2007 23:22 GMT
> I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids sports.
> After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax K10D are
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> 1.  Can an amazing lens compensate for lack of body features, and compared
> to Pentax, are the Nikon lenses that much better?

Some Nikon lenses have IS/VR/AS (image stabilisation), where-as none of
the Pentax lenses do.
For the simple reason that all Pentax DSLR cameras on the market now
have sensor-shift AS, so there is no need for AS lenses for Pentax.

> 2.  If you have great body features such as image stabilization and 11 point
> autofocus, does that compensate for a good lens that doesn't have those
> features?

As a general rule, if IS/VR/AS (image stabilisation) is built into the
body, then it won't be in the lenses (the only exception seems to 4/3:
Olympus bodies Vs Leica lenses).
There only seems to be a few bodies which have both an AF motor and
contacts for in-lens motor, the two current Pentax DSLR cameras and all
Nikons except the bottom model (D40x ?).

> 3.  If I were to get the Pentax with the great body features, and a Pentax
> lens with the same features, does that have a compound effect and make
> sports shots that much more superior?  i.e.  Does having stabilization in
> the camera and in the lens mean I now have super stabilization, or is it
> unnecessary to have it in both?

With Pentax there are no IS/VR/AS (image stabilisation) lenses, so there
can't be a "fight" between the sensor-shift AS and in-lens AS.
The same with Nikon, for the opposite reason.
It could conceivably happen with FourThirds, some Olympus DSLR camera
bodies have AS built in (like the Pentax DSLR cameras), there are some
FourThirds AS lenses (similar to Nikon IS) and mixing the two could have
interesting results

> Any responses would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks,
>
> -John
DBLEXPOSURE - 26 Nov 2007 23:52 GMT
> I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids
> sports. After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> -John

John,

I bet you watch pro sports.  Take a look at the Photogs on the sidelines,
They are shooting either Canon or Nikon and have choice glass to boot.  They
make their living with their gear and you can bet they have more invested in
glass than in camera bodies.

I  like to say, "buy a lens and put a camera on it".

Feature rich cameras are nice but you will find that you never use all of
the features anyway.  The important thing is to get the feature you want.
Of course you do not know yet what features are important to you.

You also do not know what you are going to do with the photos.  4X6 prints
and the occasional 8X10 (8X12)?  Web site and email?

The D40X is a good choice, I have heard good things...  I'm like Canon and
would push you towards the XTi.  Either will do justice and are good entry
level DSLR's

More important than any of this is to develop the skill of taking good
photographs.  So many see that big black machine with the words Canon or
Nikon on it and think that the photos will automatically turn out great, not
true...

Learn to compose, expose and edit...  Read.  Shoot tons of photos,
experiment, get critiques.  Stay away from the NG's and post images and good
critique sites like DPreveiw, Usefilm, Pop Photo and Shutterbug.  There are
many others...
Ken Hart - 27 Nov 2007 01:42 GMT
> I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids
> sports. After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> with lesser body specs is the way to go (D40x), as long as I get a VR lens
> (about $700-$750 for a 50-200mm).

It is entirely possible that Nikon may be paying a promomtional commission
to salespeople.

Which camera 'feels' best? Which one is easier for YOU to use? Historically,
Nikons have been the cameras of professionals and Pentax has been the camera
for beginners. So much for the snob factor!
Explore the features and accessories available for each camera, and pick the
one that you think will give you what you want.
Cats - 27 Nov 2007 07:54 GMT
On Nov 26, 8:28 pm, "Eichler34" <john.eich...@comcast.net_nospam>
wrote:
> I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids sports.
> After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax K10D are
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> specs is the way to go (D40x), as long as I get a VR lens (about $700-$750
> for a 50-200mm).

Did he say *why* he thought it better to have the featuers in the
lens?

> Until this conversation, I was 100% set on the Pentax, so I was hoping the
> following questions could be answered:
>
> 1.  Can an amazing lens compensate for lack of body features, and compared
> to Pentax, are the Nikon lenses that much better?

Both cameras have optically excellent lenses available.  With the
Pentax, you can use any Pentax lens with it, even the old M42 thread
ones with an adapter.  Obviously that won't make a manual focus lens
into an autofocus one, but it opens up using lots of very good lenses
brought reasonably on Ebay.

As to which is the absolute best lens - you probably don't want to
spend that much money...

> 2.  If you have great body features such as image stabilization and 11 point
> autofocus, does that compensate for a good lens that doesn't have those
> features?

The autofocus method was never anything to do with the lens - it's the
motor that's in the lens for the D30x, not the mechanism for
determining where to focus.  And my view is that having image
stabilisation in the body is good as I get a much wider choice of
lenses from both the original maker and 3rd party makers.

> 3.  If I were to get the Pentax with the great body features, and a Pentax
> lens with the same features, does that have a compound effect and make
> sports shots that much more superior?  i.e.  Does having stabilization in
> the camera and in the lens mean I now have super stabilization, or is it
> unnecessary to have it in both?

There are no Pentax lenses with IS so they can't compete.

> Any responses would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks,

And as someone else said, have you been to a shop to try the cameras
out?  I'm sure you woudn't buy a quality suit based on magazine
reviews - you'd want to try it one and see how it fits.  The same with
a camera IMHO.
Chris Hills - 27 Nov 2007 08:11 GMT
>I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids sports.
>After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax K10D are
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>the camera and in the lens mean I now have super stabilization, or is it
>unnecessary to have it in both?

Good lenses are a must. They will stay with you longer than the camera
body. Later you can buy the Nikon  D300 or D400 as you progress and
still use the same lenses.

The other thing is don't get hung up on specs. a good picture depends on
what is in the frame.  That is down to you (and the lens to some extent)
not the spec of the camera body.

VR  is not a "must"  it was not used for the first 200 years of
photography. If you are doing low light it is useful but not
essential.... (use a tripod :-)

It depends what the kids sports are. If it is indoor in a well lit hall
you are not going to need VR.

Signature

\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills  Staffs  England     /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org      www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Akiralx - 27 Nov 2007 15:05 GMT
> I'm in the process of purchasing a DSLR camera primarily for my kids
> sports. After doing a lot of research it appears the Nikon D40x or Pentax
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Any responses would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks,

Either will be fine, I'm a Nikon man so know about them.  But handle both
and get which feels best.

Remember though: image stabilisation, whether in-body or in-lens, will do
nothing for subject motion, e.g. sports, which you said will be your main
subject.  IS is only good for camera shake.

For sports you need fast shutter speeds (1/500th or faster perhaps) - and
that means fast glass, i.e. with a wide maximum aperture, preferably of f/2
or better.  So for example an f/4.5 - f/5.6 zoom won't do it (can't recall
what the Nikon 55-200VR is but it's not fast).  With such a commercial zoom
your shots will be blurred, dark or both.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.