
Signature
E-mails to the return address will not be read.
E-mails can be sent to jodel at tiscali dot etc for a UK company.
> Would I be right in thinking that the 70-200 should give me better results
> in the 100-200mm range than the 100-400?
Yes, check dpreview for endlress discussion.
> What about the 70-200 with a 2x converter versus the 100-400 in the 200-400
> range?
You may mean 2xII. Again, lots of debate.
> Ignoring the price for now, (and the 70-100mm area) which would you go for?
> the 100-400 or the 70-200 and a 2x converter?
I have the 100-400 and the 2xII, on a 1Ds. The alternative would be a
straight 400mm lens plus the 70-200. Pay money, make choice. The 300D is a
small camera for any of this stuff: they're all beefy lenses.