Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / UK Photography / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Gimmick-reduced digital camera?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nick Maclaren - 16 Nov 2007 12:53 GMT
I used to use a Carl Zeiss (Jena) 35 mm, which had the three traditional
controls and a few rarely-used extras, but it is heavy and bulky and I
am getting too old to carry extra weight when walking.

I have been borrowing my wife's Olympus Mju, and find it the most
loathesome, gimmick-ridden heap of rubbish I have used in a long time.
So what I am wondering is whether there is any digital camera that is,
or can be configured to be, fairly gimmick-free.

I want to be able to photograph small things (e.g. flowers), where
time is not critical, so a reasonable zoom would be nice.

I want to be able to photograph from almost twilight to bright sun,
so need a reasonable range there.

But (and here's the rub) I want to be able to photograph animals,
traffic and children, so I need to be able to take a picture NOW.
And I need the camera to be ready for that unless I have specially
set it into another mode, including when just taken out of a pocket.
Ideally, 3 seconds setup from pocket in any light level, and taking
a picture within 0.2 seconds of pressing the button.  Hell, that used
to be possible :-(

I don't mind an arbitrary number of gimmicks, if they can be ignored
or won't be invoked by accident, but mixing them up with the critical
controls is just plain bad engineering.

I had no problem setting distance and aperture by touch alone on my
Zeiss, but realise that asking for that on a modern electronic device
is asking for the moon.  However, I do want reasonable simplicity.

Is that feasible nowadays?

Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
newshound - 16 Nov 2007 23:25 GMT
Personally I find my Ixus 850 IS meets a lot of these requirements. It's
fairly fast, fully auto is pretty good. There's a simple "dial" for viewing,
auto, manual, effects, video. I tend to keep the programmable mode set at
1600 so that I can snatch a shot in low light if I need to. Image
stabilisation is worth two stops, I reckon. I find the extra width of a
28-equivalent handy. The video's not bad, too.
Nick Maclaren - 17 Nov 2007 10:04 GMT
|> Personally I find my Ixus 850 IS meets a lot of these requirements. It's
|> fairly fast, fully auto is pretty good. There's a simple "dial" for viewing,
|> auto, manual, effects, video. I tend to keep the programmable mode set at
|> 1600 so that I can snatch a shot in low light if I need to. Image
|> stabilisation is worth two stops, I reckon. I find the extra width of a
|> 28-equivalent handy. The video's not bad, too.

Thanks.  I'll look at that.

Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
Alan Clifford - 17 Nov 2007 00:08 GMT
NM>
NM> I want to be able to photograph from almost twilight to bright sun,
NM> so need a reasonable range there.
NM>

I guess you want a small, manual camera with focus, aperture and zoom
rings with decent high iso performance.  I don't think you'll get one.

I have a Fuji f31fd which might suit you too.  Shutter priority as well as
aperture priority modes available.  Fully auto mode will boost the iso as
required whilst in manual (ie automatic aperture and shutter speed) mode,
you can limit the boost so it doesn't go too far.

The buttons are relatively large.  No viewfinder though ;-( You can ignore
the fd facility.  Battery life is good.

http://fujifilm.co.uk/consumer/digital/digital-cameras/advanced-compact/finepix-
f31fd/Specs


For an interesting review of its (predecessor's) high iso performance, see
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/compactcamerahighiso/page3.asp

The newer models appear to have lost the shutter and aperture priority
modes which is a shame.

Signature

Alan

( If replying by mail, please note that all "sardines" are canned.
 However, unless this a very old message, a "tuna" will swim right
 through. )

Nick Maclaren - 17 Nov 2007 10:07 GMT
|> NM> I want to be able to photograph from almost twilight to bright sun,
|> NM> so need a reasonable range there.
|>
|> I guess you want a small, manual camera with focus, aperture and zoom
|> rings with decent high iso performance.  I don't think you'll get one.

Thanks.  That's useful.  The high ISO rating is probably the least
important, as the period of dropping light is fairly short (i.e. that
between where most cameras can handle it and that where only really
specialist ones will).

|> I have a Fuji f31fd which might suit you too.  Shutter priority as well as
|> aperture priority modes available.  Fully auto mode will boost the iso as
|> required whilst in manual (ie automatic aperture and shutter speed) mode,
|> you can limit the boost so it doesn't go too far.

Thanks.  I will look at that.

Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.