Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / UK Photography / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How crappy is Nikon 5000ED software these days?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Peter - 12 Nov 2007 07:24 GMT
I bought the 5000ED and a bulk slide feeder ~ 3 years ago, for about
£1300, for the single purpose of scanning in 5000 slides for which the
lowest commercial quote was £2500 :)

It did the job OK, with many software crashes...

I have just used it again to scan in a few hundred 35mm transparencies
in strips (unmounted) using the film feeder (the one which can scan
2-6 trannies in one piece).

The control software crashes roughly every 2 scans. It's a piece of
sh1t. I have heard this from professional Nikon gear owners too.

I wonder if anybody is using more recent software and how reliable it
is.

The scanner is very good quality. However the film feeder is
unreliable but that is another thing - I am having to feed some strips
in upside down and then invert the image in software. The strips are
not bent lengthwise; they have been stored perfectly flat for about 20
years; Kodachrome mainly.
Michael J Davis - 12 Nov 2007 12:37 GMT
Peter <peter0o0o0o@peter2-0-o-0.c0.uk> observed
>I bought the 5000ED and a bulk slide feeder ~ 3 years ago, for about
>£1300, for the single purpose of scanning in 5000 slides for which the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>not bent lengthwise; they have been stored perfectly flat for about 20
>years; Kodachrome mainly.

Check out vuescan from http://www.hamrick.com/

I've used it happily with my Canon scanner.

ummm, must update it!!

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
Signature

 Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><

Willy Eckerslyke - 13 Nov 2007 09:57 GMT
> Check out vuescan from http://www.hamrick.com/
>
> I've used it happily with my Canon scanner.

Silverfast is another option. I used it in the past with a Nikon film
scanner and a different version in a Umax flatbed. Dunno how it compares
nowadays, but it used to be excellent, though pricey - especially when
there was no discount if you needed more than one version.
http://www.silverfast.com
Peter - 13 Nov 2007 11:10 GMT
>> Check out vuescan from http://www.hamrick.com/
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>there was no discount if you needed more than one version.
>http://www.silverfast.com

I've used Silverfast - it used to be bundled with a certain Epson A4
scanner I have.

However, the problem isn't in the raw scanning. The Nikon does the
dumb scanning fine. It is to do with the way the Nikon software
interfaces with the scanner accessories e.g. the bulk slide feeder or
the film strip scanner.

The bulk feeder works OK most of the time but the strip feeder crashes
the software roughly every two scans.

I don't think Silverfast will have the special features for these
accessories.
Trev - 13 Nov 2007 11:50 GMT
>>> Check out vuescan from http://www.hamrick.com/
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> I don't think Silverfast will have the special features for these
> accessories.

Would that be a Memorey problem by chance

Signature

Trev
You can always tell a Yorkshire man,
But you can't tell him much.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.