>> See subject. My sister in law wants to know.
>>
>> Ideas, comments?
>
>Depends what you want really. No such thing as "best" just the nearest to
>ideal for what you want. Without knowing what you want then we can't say.

Signature
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
> Message-ID: <a17ce$469c9ecf$3e18e6cb$18313@news.vispa.com> from Richard
> Polhill contained the following:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> looking at picture quality, followed by ease of use and value for
> money. Anything over 6 megapixel would be fine.
Megapixel? So you want a DIGITAL SLR? That makes a lot of difference.
Go to a shop and try them. Seriously, if the only reason you want an SLR is
the instant response, go and try some compacts that have fast response.
Most dSLRs will still pause if they are struggling to focus, esp in low light.
Yeah they're pretty instant at focusing in good light, but you can still find
yourself waiting for the thing to refocus if it isn't sure. And that is just
as frustrating with a £400 SLR as with a £200 compact.
> I'm pretty sure my SIL will not be too bothered by non interchangeable
> lenses.
I still say you probably want a good compact. No point in having a big bulky
and expensive SLR if you're not a photography enthusiast. The best camera in
the world is one you have with you when you need it.
So... Canon compacts are pretty fast to respond. Avoid Nikon and Olympus as
they're slow. I'm sure there are other suggestions.
Chris Whelan - 17 Jul 2007 16:01 GMT
>> Message-ID: <a17ce$469c9ecf$3e18e6cb$18313@news.vispa.com> from Richard
>> Polhill contained the following:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> So... Canon compacts are pretty fast to respond. Avoid Nikon and Olympus
> as they're slow. I'm sure there are other suggestions.
Whilst agreeing that the OP's SIL may well be best advised to get a compact,
a Canon dSLR is way faster to focus than a Canon compact, and of course you
have the opportunity with the dSLR to switch to manual focus.
The one thing I regret about changing from a digital compact to a dSLR is
that I didn't do it sooner...
Chris

Signature
Remove prejudice to reply.
Geoff Berrow - 17 Jul 2007 16:43 GMT
Message-ID: <3229e$469ccc55$3e18e6cb$32675@news.vispa.com> from Richard
Polhill contained the following:
>> I'm pretty sure my SIL will not be too bothered by non interchangeable
>> lenses.
>
>I still say you probably want a good compact. No point in having a big bulky
>and expensive SLR if you're not a photography enthusiast. The best camera in
>the world is one you have with you when you need it.
I'm pretty certain that you're right. She'd probably just leave the
damn thing on auto and that would be a waste. What people fail to
realise is that an SLR or DSLR usually gives you many more ways to take
a bad picture.
>So... Canon compacts are pretty fast to respond.
Useful information.

Signature
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
Chris Whelan - 17 Jul 2007 16:47 GMT
> Message-ID: <3229e$469ccc55$3e18e6cb$32675@news.vispa.com> from Richard
> Polhill contained the following:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Useful information.
...and more here:
http://www.cameras.co.uk/html/shutter-lag-comparisons.cfm
Chris

Signature
Remove prejudice to reply.
Richard Polhill - 18 Jul 2007 08:00 GMT
>> Message-ID: <3229e$469ccc55$3e18e6cb$32675@news.vispa.com> from Richard
>> Polhill contained the following:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Chris
Ah great I was looking for a chart like that. So Kodak or Sony it would be then.
harrogate3 - 18 Jul 2007 08:24 GMT
> >> Message-ID: <3229e$469ccc55$3e18e6cb$32675@news.vispa.com> from Richard
> >> Polhill contained the following:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> >
> Ah great I was looking for a chart like that. So Kodak or Sony it would be then.
Don't be so quick to judge. The delay in taking a picture is in the
main due to the focus system - if you press the shutter half way to
prefocus then when you press further to take the picture it is
essentially instant. The focus system can take different times to work
under different lighting conditions - for instance taking a view on a
sunny day will usually be very quick, but try taking a picture in low
light, or especially a contra jour shot (sun behind subject) on a
bright day and it will take longer.
When I went to digital compact originally I missed this point, so when
I upgraded I took particular notice of it. From my own research and
tests I have found that the quickest seem to be Casio and Canon, with
Fuji and Sony (W range) not far behind. Much the slowest are Nikon and
Olympus.
Also don't get caught in the race for pixels. To print a full frame
picture to A4 only requires 3Mp, anything above about 6Mp will start
to run into thermal noise problems, so for general use and to allow a
little cropping 5-6Mp is about the optimum.
I have three digitals: an Olympus C5050 (5Mp) which is horribly slow
but has probably the best lens, flash, and metering system by far
(compared with a compact) bar a little barrel distortion at the widest
setting; a Nikon D70s SLR (6Mp) which I love; a Canon Ixus 60 (6Mp).
We have just come back from holiday in France where between us my wife
and I took nearly 1200 shots (the beauty of digital!) - I didn't take
the Olympus. Generally speaking it is almost impossible to
differentiate between snapshots taken with the Canon and the Nikon (in
jpg mode.) I say snapshots as the one thing you can do with any dSLR
but NOT with a compact is to catch a moving object successfully. No
matter how fast a compact responds it will never match the near
instant reaction of a dSLR.
As a photographer for over 40 years man and boy I would give the same
advice as I did when people used to ask me which (film) camera to buy.
You have got to live with the thing: no matter how many bells and
whistles it has if you cannot hold and use it comfortably it will
rapidly fall into disuse, or it will be blamed for poor pictures when
a poor picture is solely the responsibility of the idiot taking it! (I
have fairly large hands and so could never get on with the Olympus OM1
film SLR as it was too small, but the Minolta XG2 or XD9 was no
problem being about the same size but just a few mill thicker to get
may hands around.) Take your SIL to a good camera supplier - Jessops
or Jacobs nationally - on a quiet day and have them get out the
cameras that are in her price range or thereabouts. She should hold
them, play with them, and take some pictures. (If the shop doesn't
have a charged battery - as Currys and PCW probably won't just walk
away. If they can't be bothered to provide that facility do they
warrant your business?) As sure as eggs is eggs one camera will feel
right - that is the one to buy. If more than one feels right then look
at facilities against price and ask if most/any of those facilities
will ever be needed.

Signature
Woody
harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com
Richard Polhill - 18 Jul 2007 08:37 GMT
>>>> Message-ID: <3229e$469ccc55$3e18e6cb$32675@news.vispa.com> from
> Richard
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
> at facilities against price and ask if most/any of those facilities
> will ever be needed.
I second everything you say.
Mark Dunn - 18 Jul 2007 09:33 GMT
David Kilpatrick's opinion carries a lot of weight for me. That, and it's a
Minolta.
> >>>> Message-ID: <3229e$469ccc55$3e18e6cb$32675@news.vispa.com> from
> > Richard
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> >
> I second everything you say.
Trev - 18 Jul 2007 10:04 GMT
> David Kilpatrick's opinion carries a lot of weight for me. That, and it's
> a
> Minolta.
Spelt S o n y = Minolta. I still have a soft spot for them but my brain says
Nikon Which shall win Hart or Brain And My MC/MD lens will not fit on
either.
Richard Polhill - 18 Jul 2007 10:34 GMT
>> David Kilpatrick's opinion carries a lot of weight for me. That, and it's
>> a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Nikon Which shall win Hart or Brain And My MC/MD lens will not fit on
> either.
Hah I have a stack of lovely FD lenses which'll never fit anything.
I prefer the Nikon to the Sony just for the build quality.
Michael J Davis - 18 Jul 2007 18:36 GMT
Chris Whelan <cawhelan@ntlworld.com> observed
>> Message-ID: <3229e$469ccc55$3e18e6cb$32675@news.vispa.com> from Richard
>> Polhill contained the following:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> realise is that an SLR or DSLR usually gives you many more ways to take
>> a bad picture.
>> Useful information.
>>
>...and more here:
>
>http://www.cameras.co.uk/html/shutter-lag-comparisons.cfm
If I may say so, that looks a pile of rubbish.
Presumably the timing is based on an 'auto' setting (but doesn't say
so), and therefore includes the time taken to focus (but doesn't say
so).
Presumably it doesn't take into account the delay on the viewfinder (or
screen) (but doesn't say so), which IMHO is the major problem with
digicams, and adds significantly to the delay between
*what is seen on the screen* AND *what is captured as image*
So in short, it is really measuring the time the autofocus takes (given
that the exposure is being set within that time (but doesn't say so).
If like me you focus while composing the picture and leave the camera to
assess the exposure, the delay is more likely to be in the region of 0.1
and 0.25 seconds on many of those cameras. (Of course those supposes
that the cameras have manual focus capability.)
The five photo times are presumably based on setting the camera in
continuous setting (but doesn't say so), and are thus more a function of
the time taken to store the picture. If the table is based on the user
pressing the exposure button five times (but doesn't say so) then the
delay introduced by the user is likely to be significant.
So my advice to the OP is to find a camera for his SIL that has manual
focussing - if shutter delay is his main criterion.
See http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs.asp
Mike
[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]

Signature
Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><