About three years ago, my Praktica AM-1 started falling apart, so I
thought I'd get a digital camera, and bought a Fuji S7000.
I'm sure it's a very nice camera, but we don't seem to use it much. We
certainly haven't managed to take many pictures as good as the ones we
took on the SLR, and my girlfriend has barely used it at all and doesn't
like it.
I'd like to get a digital SLR that's as much as possible like the old
35mm camera that got such a lot of use, and can be used as much as
possible in just the same way.
The things that really matter to me are:
* split-prism viewfinder (I don't care if people sneer at them, that's
what I find easiest to focus)
* aperture ring on the lens barrel (and one that's actually coupled to
the iris, not an electronic control)
* size and shape - I like the way the square, flat Praktica fits in my
hands, and dislike the large, bulbous shapes that seem to be mostly
popular now.
Am I going to find anything that meets these criteria, or should I just
take the Praktica down to Jessops in town and ask them to do it up for
me?
Thanks,
Daniele
Geoff Berrow - 23 Feb 2007 01:54 GMT
Message-ID:
<1htyqtd.jbld5xm0gl1vN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>
from D.M. Procida contained the following:
>* split-prism viewfinder (I don't care if people sneer at them, that's
>what I find easiest to focus)
Me too. I really miss that on my D70 but auto focus is very good these
days.

Signature
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
Mike Coon - 25 Feb 2007 15:06 GMT
> Me too. I really miss that [split-prism viewfinder] on my D70 but auto
> focus is very good
> these days.
But only if your photos are the right sort. I often take photos of birds
through partially obscuring foliage. I don't believe any camera will
understand that focusing on the foliage is of no use whatever!
Mike.

Signature
If reply address = connectfee, add an r because it is free not fee.
Adrian Boliston - 23 Feb 2007 13:59 GMT
> .....
> The things that really matter to me are:
>
> * split-prism viewfinder (I don't care if people sneer at them, that's
> what I find easiest to focus)
I'm sure I've heard of a "Catz Eye" split prism that can be added to a Nikon
DSLR.
> * aperture ring on the lens barrel (and one that's actually coupled to
> the iris, not an electronic control)
My 35mm F2 AF-D Nikkor lens has an aperture ring, but I've always locked it
at f22 which seems to be the requirement with my D70s. With DSLRs the
aperture is normally set by the front thumbwheel on the camera body.
> * size and shape - I like the way the square, flat Praktica fits in my
> hands, and dislike the large, bulbous shapes that seem to be mostly
> popular now.
The D80 is a nice compact size, and it has a good viewfinder.
cheers adrian www.boliston.co.uk
Willy Eckerslyke - 23 Feb 2007 14:53 GMT
>>* size and shape - I like the way the square, flat Praktica fits in my
>>hands, and dislike the large, bulbous shapes that seem to be mostly
>>popular now.
> The D80 is a nice compact size,
For certain values of "compact"!
I've just sat one next to an ancient Praktica and am surprised to find
that the Practica is a couple of cm wider from side to side. Heights are
almost identical, but the depth (front to back) of the D80 is at least
50% greater than the Practika (which wasn't exactly slim itself).
So the D80 _is_ large and bulbous - but I've never found that a problem
as it's so well balanced.