Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / UK Photography / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

film scanner

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Colin Wood - 19 Jan 2007 00:31 GMT
I've been using a Konica Minolta Dimage Scan Dual IV with some success,
but its transport mechanism is now failing - it seems as if some teeth
from a gear wheel or similar are worne, and the negative holder has
needed a gentle push when scanning. This has become much worse recently.

Does anyone know /how/ where/ to get this sorted? Is it worth doing?

As far as I know Sony are not making any of these scanners following
their purchase of Konica-Minolta, so I can't get a direct replacement. I
have looked at ebay, but they are like gold dust - scarce and expensive.
Anyone know of any other source?

If I go for another make, what is available that works as well? Canon?
Nikon? Is there any specialist retailer out there that any of you would
recommend?

I'd be grateful for any advice.

Regards to all,

Signature

                                    _______________________
    __                             /
   /   _ |. _  \    /_  _  _|     /      
   \__(_)||| )  \/\/(_)(_)(_|    /        StrongArm RiscPC
 _______________________________/           RISC OS 4.39

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Tony Polson - 19 Jan 2007 07:25 GMT
>I've been using a Konica Minolta Dimage Scan Dual IV with some success,
>but its transport mechanism is now failing - it seems as if some teeth
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>I'd be grateful for any advice.

The Minolta scanners seem to have a lot of problems.  The last version
of the 5400 was plagued with severe mechanical problems - a pity,
because it was otherwise an excellent scanner.  

The support from Sony is not said to be good, however I heard a couple
of ex-Konica Minolta technicians have set up a new service facility in
or near Milton Keynes.  Unfortunately I have no further details, but a
call to Konica Minolta in Milton Keynes might help - they still exist,
because they still sell photocopiers, and they might be able to put
you in touch with their ex-colleagues.

Your best option in new scanners is Nikon.  Canon scanners are no
longer made.  They were always the poor relation to Minolta and Nikon.

Three Nikon scanners are still listed, the Coolscan V for 35mm, with
4000 dpi and 14 bit processing, the Coolscan 5000 for 35mm, also with
4000 dpi but with 16 bit processing, and the Coolscan 9000, for 35mm
and medium format film, also with 4000 dpi and 16 bit processing.  The
Coolscan V is USB 2.0, the others need a FireWire 1394 card in your
PC.

They are not cheap, but they are superbly made and ultra-reliable.  If
you are happy with the Scan Dual IV, the Coolscan V will be a
substantial step up with its 4000 dpi resolution.  

The Coolscan 5000 is a lot more exoensive and the extra two bits (16
bit as against 14) are only needed if you want to extract the absolute
maximum of shadow detail out of your slides.  It is a very fast
scanner, with a slide taking less than 30 seconds.  

The 5000 will also accept a 50-slide capacity feeder which makes
scanning of large numbers of mounted slides much easier and quicker.
It will also accept an adaptor for roll film, meaning you can scan a
whole 35mm film in one operation.  However, these accessories are
expensive.

If you use medium format film, the Coolscan 9000 is a must.  It also
scans 35mm film, but is slower in use than the Coolscan V and 5000.

Nikon scanners are selling in only very small numbers now, and there
are rumours that production has ended.  So don't delay if you want to
buy a new one.  Shop around online for best prices, as there is a huge
variation.  Prices in New York are dramatically cheaper than here, so
if you plan a US visit in 2007, buy one while you are there.  Even
paying import duty (3.5%) and VAT (17.5%) you will save money

Good luck!
Colin Wood - 19 Jan 2007 17:23 GMT
> >I've been using a Konica Minolta Dimage Scan Dual IV with some
> >success, but its transport mechanism is now failing - it seems as if
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >
> >I'd be grateful for any advice.

> The Minolta scanners seem to have a lot of problems.  The last version
> of the 5400 was plagued with severe mechanical problems - a pity,
> because it was otherwise an excellent scanner.  

> The support from Sony is not said to be good, however I heard a couple
> of ex-Konica Minolta technicians have set up a new service facility in
> or near Milton Keynes.  Unfortunately I have no further details, but a
> call to Konica Minolta in Milton Keynes might help - they still exist,
> because they still sell photocopiers, and they might be able to put
> you in touch with their ex-colleagues.

> Your best option in new scanners is Nikon.  Canon scanners are no
> longer made.  They were always the poor relation to Minolta and Nikon.

> Three Nikon scanners are still listed, the Coolscan V for 35mm, with
> 4000 dpi and 14 bit processing, the Coolscan 5000 for 35mm, also with
> 4000 dpi but with 16 bit processing, and the Coolscan 9000, for 35mm
> and medium format film, also with 4000 dpi and 16 bit processing.  The
> Coolscan V is USB 2.0, the others need a FireWire 1394 card in your
> PC.

> They are not cheap, but they are superbly made and ultra-reliable.  If
> you are happy with the Scan Dual IV, the Coolscan V will be a
> substantial step up with its 4000 dpi resolution.  

> The Coolscan 5000 is a lot more exoensive and the extra two bits (16
> bit as against 14) are only needed if you want to extract the absolute
> maximum of shadow detail out of your slides.  It is a very fast
> scanner, with a slide taking less than 30 seconds.  

> The 5000 will also accept a 50-slide capacity feeder which makes
> scanning of large numbers of mounted slides much easier and quicker.
> It will also accept an adaptor for roll film, meaning you can scan a
> whole 35mm film in one operation.  However, these accessories are
> expensive.

> If you use medium format film, the Coolscan 9000 is a must.  It also
> scans 35mm film, but is slower in use than the Coolscan V and 5000.

> Nikon scanners are selling in only very small numbers now, and there
> are rumours that production has ended.  So don't delay if you want to
> buy a new one.  Shop around online for best prices, as there is a huge
> variation.  Prices in New York are dramatically cheaper than here, so
> if you plan a US visit in 2007, buy one while you are there.  Even
> paying import duty (3.5%) and VAT (17.5%) you will save money

> Good luck!

Replied off list, with my thanks for all this information.

Have now ordered one!

Regards to all,

Signature

                                    _______________________
    __                             /
   /   _ |. _  \    /_  _  _|     /      
   \__(_)||| )  \/\/(_)(_)(_|    /        StrongArm RiscPC
 _______________________________/           RISC OS 4.39

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Tony Polson - 19 Jan 2007 19:49 GMT
>Replied off list, with my thanks for all this information.

You're welcome, Colin.  I won't have received your off-list reply for
the simple reason that my "email address" is a spoof to deter junk
email.

>Have now ordered one!

Well done!  If I guessed I would probably say "Coolscan V".

;-)
Colin Wood - 31 Jan 2007 15:35 GMT
snip
> >Have now ordered one!

> Well done!  If I guessed I would probably say "Coolscan V".

Yes, indeed the Coolscan V

It is working well. In particular, I've been scanning old - very faded
and overall mainly brown - Gevacolour slides; using the setting which
iirc looks at each of the 3 colour layers separately, results are superb,
much better than trying Photoshop elements 4 on a normal scan.

Is it possible to get a multislide feeder - even for 4 slides like the
Minolta?

Best wishes,

Signature

                                    _______________________
    __                             /
   /   _ |. _  \    /_  _  _|     /      
   \__(_)||| )  \/\/(_)(_)(_|    /        StrongArm RiscPC
 _______________________________/           RISC OS 4.39

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Trev - 31 Jan 2007 18:30 GMT
> snip
>> >Have now ordered one!
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Best wishes,

I had some Gevacolour slides taken in Aden I though it was the heat that
had added the brown look and I dont mean Tan. Most taken out with Fade
correction in PSP 7 long long ago
Tony Polson - 31 Jan 2007 20:28 GMT
>snip
>> >Have now ordered one!
>
>> Well done!  If I guessed I would probably say "Coolscan V".
>
>Yes, indeed the Coolscan V

Well done.  It is a fine scanner.

>It is working well. In particular, I've been scanning old - very faded
>and overall mainly brown - Gevacolour slides; using the setting which
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Is it possible to get a multislide feeder - even for 4 slides like the
>Minolta?

I don't think so, not for the Coolscan V.  If I recall correctly, the
50 slide feeder is for the 4000 and 5000 models.  

Do you have a young relative whom you could get to insert the slides
in return for pocket money?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.