Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / UK Photography / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

B&W film for canon EOS500

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
alandav123 - 17 Dec 2006 22:03 GMT
Hi all, Any recomendations as to a good B&W film for taking baby
portraits?

I just bought a mint EOS 500 after a long layoff from photography and
want to get some portraits taken.

I used to use Ilford film many moons ago but perhaps things have moved
on a bit.

Regards Alan
Richard Polhill - 17 Dec 2006 22:57 GMT
> Hi all, Any recomendations as to a good B&W film for taking baby
> portraits?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Regards Alan

Ilford FP4
Tony  Polson - 17 Dec 2006 23:29 GMT
>> Hi all, Any recomendations as to a good B&W film for taking baby
>> portraits?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>Ilford FP4

I would strongly recommend Ilford XP2 (and its Fuji-badged equivalent)
or Kodak BW 400CN.  Both are ISO 400 C41 films with excellent
latitude.  They can be processed cheaply in any 1-hour minilab (Boots,
Asda, Tesco etc.) because their chemistry (C41) is the same as colour
print film.  You can also get the images cheaply scanned to CD.

Ilford FP4 is a nice film, but you either have to process and print
(or scan) it yourself, or rely on an ever-decreasing number of labs
that develop and print black and white film.  All of them cost a lot
more than developing and printing at Boots, Asda or Tesco, and if they
offer scanning to CD, it is usually very expensive indeed.

Another benefit of Ilford XP2 or Kodak BW 400CN is that they offer ISO
400 speed with less granularity than Ilford FP4, which is ISO 125.
They can also be exposed at any ISO rating between 100 and 800.
Mark Dunn - 18 Dec 2006 09:38 GMT
Shame on you! Last time I shot b/w I used 400CN. But I felt dirty.

> >> Hi all, Any recomendations as to a good B&W film for taking baby
> >> portraits?
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> 400 speed with less granularity than Ilford FP4, which is ISO 125.
> They can also be exposed at any ISO rating between 100 and 800.
Duncan - 18 Dec 2006 06:26 GMT
FP4 is a good choice and if you are looking for a high key result then use a
faster film HP5+ as it is a lower contrast.

Any make of film will get you a result and it's experience that will tell
you what to use. Personally anything in Rodinal works for me as processing
is just an integral factor as choice of film.

Duncan

>> Hi all, Any recomendations as to a good B&W film for taking baby
>> portraits?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
> Ilford FP4
A.Lee - 18 Dec 2006 16:41 GMT
> Hi all, Any recomendations as to a good B&W film for taking baby
> portraits?

I always use Delta 400 for everything B+W. Cannot fault it, and no
problems at all with graininess, if anything, I'd say it was on a par
with FP4 from the mid-80's, with the benefit of 2 extra stops in
exposure.
Alan.
Signature

To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'.

alandav123 - 19 Dec 2006 16:52 GMT
Thanks to everyones helpful comments

Regards Alan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.