I've been looking at rangefinder cameras recently (I must be getting
old! ).
The Contax G1 and Voigtlander Bessa R are very similarly priced complete
with a lens (either 35mm or 50mm) at around £300 2nd hand.
Are these a good choice?
The Contax mainly comes with the gold/silver body, the Voigt. with a
plain black body, I'd think the gold body colour will make it rather
harder to sell on in later years?
Or is there anything else out there with a reasonable price tag?
No, I'm not interested in a really cheap Russian or Japanese
rangefinder.
Thanks for any thoughts.
Alan.

Signature
To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'.
Duncan - 08 Oct 2006 14:07 GMT
If you are going for a Contax the G2 is far superior. Bessa is a bit boxy
but nice but I love my Leica M4 just something I've been used to.
What price to you is reasonable?
Duncan
> I've been looking at rangefinder cameras recently (I must be getting
> old! ).
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Thanks for any thoughts.
> Alan.
Daniel Rocha - 09 Oct 2006 12:35 GMT
> I've been looking at rangefinder cameras recently
Nice thing :)
> The Contax G1 and Voigtlander Bessa R are very similarly priced
> complete with a lens (either 35mm or 50mm) at around £300 2nd hand.
> Are these a good choice?
There is the R2a and R3a.
> Or is there anything else out there with a reasonable price tag?
> No, I'm not interested in a really cheap Russian or Japanese
> rangefinder.
Reasonnable price tag ?
You can consider also he Zeiss Ikon, less expansive than a Leica.
Or Leica too, but how much do you want to spend ?

Signature
<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com
equiphoto - 09 Oct 2006 16:56 GMT
Note that the Contax is auto focus and the Bessa is manual focus. That might
make up your mind for you.
Alternatives? In the price range, I would think only other Bessas.
The Bessa R is available NEW with a 35mm lens for $400 from the US on Ebay.
Even if you pay import duty etc it's still a good deal.
Peter
> I've been looking at rangefinder cameras recently (I must be getting
> old! ).
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Thanks for any thoughts.
> Alan.
Richard Polhill - 10 Oct 2006 08:23 GMT
> Note that the Contax is auto focus
An auto focus range finder?
Richard Polhill - 10 Oct 2006 08:33 GMT
>> Note that the Contax is auto focus
>
> An auto focus range finder?
Or more importantly, why?
Tony Polson - 22 Oct 2006 12:03 GMT
>>> Note that the Contax is auto focus
>>
>> An auto focus range finder?
>
>Or more importantly, why?
The G System offered an autofocus point and shoot option with
excellent lenses. It was aimed at people who wanted the appearance of
owning a rangefinder camera but could not be bothered to focus
manually.
As with all autofocus cameras, the question was whether it focused
correctly on what you wanted to be in sharp focus. Often, the G1 and
G2 get it hopelessly wrong, and you don't know until you see the
results.
Of course, if you always shoot at f/8 and smaller apertures, it hardly
matters.
Richard Cole - 09 Oct 2006 19:34 GMT
>I've been looking at rangefinder cameras recently (I must be getting
>old! ).
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>rangefinder.
>Thanks for any thoughts.
Alan.
As I'm now almost completely using digital now, the Epson R-D1s look good
as does the new Leica (M10?).
Richard
Web pages: http://www.caravanningnow.co.uk/ - caravanning,
http://www.rcole.org/ - personal web site and http://www.homeindorset.co.uk
because I loves the domain name for email.

Signature
Multitasking allows screwing up several things at once.
Tony Polson - 22 Oct 2006 11:57 GMT
>I've been looking at rangefinder cameras recently (I must be getting
>old! ).
>The Contax G1 and Voigtlander Bessa R are very similarly priced complete
>with a lens (either 35mm or 50mm) at around £300 2nd hand.
>Are these a good choice?
The Contax G1 and G2 are *not* rangefinder cameras. They are
autofocus compact cameras with interchangeable lenses.
Like any autofocus cameras they may or may not focus correctly on the
subject. Unlike an autofocus SLR there is no way to check through the
viewfinder that the camera's chosen focusing distance is the one you
wanted, so you take the risk of getting some unpleasant surprises
after the film is developed. The G2's autofocus is slightly more
predictable than the G1's but this is basically an unsatisfactory
system for a serious photographer. The "manual focus" mode is a joke.
The Voigtländer Bessa R is a true rangefinder but it only takes Leica
screw mount lenses. The Bessa R2 accepts Leica M lenses or screw
mount lenses with a simple adaptor and is a far better buy. Build
quality of the R and R2 is flaky, but they are low cost entries to
rangefinder photography.
Personally, I would strongly recommend that you consider a user
condition Leica M2 or M3, available at very reasonable prices on eBay.
My 1957 M3 is in severely battered condition but it still works
perfectly. Try to find one that has had a recent service. It adds
little to the price of the camera but will save you the cost of a
service if one turns out to be needed.