>There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything other
>than a x1 CF card. If your camera is able to do so it will say so in
>the instructions; if it is not mentioned then assume not.
Well that answers my question..... thanks.
>Think very carefully about card size. Whilst 1Gb is useful as it holds
>a lot of pictures, it is also a lot of pictures to loose if it fails
>or is stolen (I speak from bitter experience!) I carry several 256Mb
>cards instead.
Yep, I was aware of that. Having splashed out on the camera (which was
more of a "want" rather than a "need"), I'm looking at cost. If I can
buy two 512Mb cards for the price of a single 1Gb then I'll do that.
>Best price at the moment is probably 7dayshop.com whom I have used
>without problem for some years. They usually supply Viking brand and I
>have had no trouble with them.
Thanks, I've looked at them among others.
>I'm sorry to tell you this, but I assume you realise that
>Konica-Minolta recently announced that they are pulling out of the
>camera market to concentrate on office products?
Yes, I was aware of that. I did leave it a bit late with my decision to
but the A200. Most places were out of stock and I think I bought the
last one from Pixmania. If I hadn't faffed about and bought it a month
ago, I could have saved about £30. As for the after sales and warranty
side of things, I believe that Sony are handling that aspect.
Thanks for your help.

Signature
Paul Giverin
British Jet Engine Website http://www.britjet.co.uk
Måns Rullgård - 26 Mar 2006 18:41 GMT
>>There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything other
>>than a x1 CF card. If your camera is able to do so it will say so in
>>the instructions; if it is not mentioned then assume not.
>>
> Well that answers my question..... thanks.
Actually, many cameras give noticeably better performance with a fast
card, but I don't know the specs for the Minolta A200. Moreover, you
should consider the time it takes to copy the photos to the computer.
A fast card can spare you quite a bit of waiting here, provided you
use a separate card reader rather than read directly from the camera.

Signature
Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com
> There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything other
> than a x1 CF card.
Ye what ????

Signature
Neil Barker
harrogate2 - 27 Mar 2006 11:17 GMT
> > There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything other
> > than a x1 CF card.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> Neil Barker
You can get CF cards in x1, x4, x12, x40, and x100, but there are very
few cameras - other than some of the very latest DSLRs - that are able
to take advantage of anything above x1 speed. It always says so in the
hamndbook if they can.
--
Woody
harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com
John Bean - 27 Mar 2006 12:47 GMT
>> > There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything
>other
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>to take advantage of anything above x1 speed. It always says so in the
>hamndbook if they can.
1x would be 150kB/sec... which means it would take 10
seconds just to write a modest 1.5MB JPEG.
You only need do a little research to see how wrong your
statement is, and I doubt a "X1" card even exists. If I'm
wrong please supply a reference to a real example.

Signature
John Bean
Neil Barker - 28 Mar 2006 11:02 GMT
> > Ye what ????
> You can get CF cards in x1, x4, x12, x40, and x100, but there are very
> few cameras - other than some of the very latest DSLRs - that are able
> to take advantage of anything above x1 speed. It always says so in the
> hamndbook if they can.
Oh, I'm perfectly aware of different speed CF cards. I simply find your
statement to be a tad ridiculous - 1x speed is 150k/sec and if it were
the case that most digicams wrote at that speed, they'd take absolutely
ages to write files.

Signature
Neil Barker
Liz - 28 Mar 2006 16:27 GMT
>> > Ye what ????
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> the case that most digicams wrote at that speed, they'd take absolutely
> ages to write files.
I'd assumed, being the Typo Queen, that the 1x was a typo.
I'd also like to point out that if the 350D's handbook says what speed
of CF it uses, that info isn't available by using the index, but it
certainly writes very fast to a fast card. (Predictably, it tries to
scare you into using only Canon-brand CFs!)
Slainte
Liz

Signature
Virtual Liz: http://www.v-liz.com
Kenya; Tanzania; Namibia; India; Seychelles; Galapagos
Photo blog of Make Povery History rally in Edinburgh 2 July 2005:
http://www.v-liz.com/g8rally/protest.htm
Måns Rullgård - 28 Mar 2006 20:01 GMT
>>> > Ye what ????
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> certainly writes very fast to a fast card. (Predictably, it tries to
> scare you into using only Canon-brand CFs!)
Canon was recently giving away Sandisk cards with some of their
cameras. Presumably they are considered safe. There was a real issue
with the 350D and (some) Lexar cards. A firmware update fixed this.

Signature
Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com
harrogate2 - 28 Mar 2006 19:05 GMT
> > > Ye what ????
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> --
> Neil Barker
I admit to standing corrected about the slowest writing speeds, but I
stand by my comments about the highest speed cards.
--
Woody
harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com
Neil Barker - 28 Mar 2006 21:22 GMT
> I admit to standing corrected about the slowest writing speeds, but I
> stand by my comments about the highest speed cards.
Oh, quite - I've got some Lexar 80x cards, plus a Sandisk Extreme -
they're great in my D2X, but wouldn't give the same advantage in say my
Ixus V430.

Signature
Neil Barker
Måns Rullgård - 28 Mar 2006 22:04 GMT
>> I admit to standing corrected about the slowest writing speeds, but I
>> stand by my comments about the highest speed cards.
>
> Oh, quite - I've got some Lexar 80x cards, plus a Sandisk Extreme -
> they're great in my D2X, but wouldn't give the same advantage in say my
> Ixus V430.
But irrespective of the camera, copying the photos to the computer
will be faster with a faster card. Sometimes this is a factor worth
considering, sometimes it's not.

Signature
Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com