Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / UK Photography / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New camera:- Memory card advice needed

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paul Giverin - 26 Mar 2006 17:13 GMT
After years of threatening, I've finally bought myself a semi-decent
camera which should arrive tomorrow.

Its a Minolta A200 and I'll need to get a Compact Flash card for it.
I'll probably go for a 1Gb card as prices seem to be falling but I'm
confused by the different speed ratings (and prices) of these cards.
Will it make any great difference if I buy the cheapest (slowest) card
with the camera I am getting?

Cheers,

Signature

Paul Giverin

British Jet Engine Website    http://www.britjet.co.uk

harrogate2 - 26 Mar 2006 17:38 GMT
> After years of threatening, I've finally bought myself a semi-decent
> camera which should arrive tomorrow.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> British Jet Engine Website    http://www.britjet.co.uk

There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything other
than a x1 CF card. If your camera is able to do so it will say so in
the instructions; if it is not mentioned then assume not.

Think very carefully about card size. Whilst 1Gb is useful as it holds
a lot of pictures, it is also a lot of pictures to loose if it fails
or is stolen (I speak from bitter experience!) I carry several 256Mb
cards instead.

Best price at the moment is probably 7dayshop.com whom I have used
without problem for some years. They usually supply Viking brand and I
have had no trouble with them.

I'm sorry to tell you this, but I assume you realise that
Konica-Minolta recently announced that they are pulling out of the
camera market to concentrate on office products?

--
Woody

harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com
Paul Giverin - 26 Mar 2006 18:23 GMT
>There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything other
>than a x1 CF card. If your camera is able to do so it will say so in
>the instructions; if it is not mentioned then assume not.

Well that answers my question..... thanks.

>Think very carefully about card size. Whilst 1Gb is useful as it holds
>a lot of pictures, it is also a lot of pictures to loose if it fails
>or is stolen (I speak from bitter experience!) I carry several 256Mb
>cards instead.

Yep, I was aware of that. Having splashed out on the camera (which was
more of a "want" rather than a "need"), I'm looking at cost. If I can
buy two 512Mb cards for the price of a single 1Gb then I'll do that.

>Best price at the moment is probably 7dayshop.com whom I have used
>without problem for some years. They usually supply Viking brand and I
>have had no trouble with them.

Thanks, I've looked at them among others.

>I'm sorry to tell you this, but I assume you realise that
>Konica-Minolta recently announced that they are pulling out of the
>camera market to concentrate on office products?

Yes, I was aware of that. I did leave it a bit late with my decision to
but the A200. Most places were out of stock and I think I bought the
last one from Pixmania. If I hadn't faffed about and bought it a month
ago, I could have saved about £30. As for the after sales and warranty
side of things, I believe that Sony are handling that aspect.

Thanks for your help.

Signature

Paul Giverin

British Jet Engine Website    http://www.britjet.co.uk

Måns Rullgård - 26 Mar 2006 18:41 GMT
>>There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything other
>>than a x1 CF card. If your camera is able to do so it will say so in
>>the instructions; if it is not mentioned then assume not.
>>
> Well that answers my question..... thanks.

Actually, many cameras give noticeably better performance with a fast
card, but I don't know the specs for the Minolta A200.  Moreover, you
should consider the time it takes to copy the photos to the computer.
A fast card can spare you quite a bit of waiting here, provided you
use a separate card reader rather than read directly from the camera.

Signature

Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com

Neil Barker - 26 Mar 2006 23:15 GMT
> There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything other
> than a x1 CF card.

Ye what ????

Signature

Neil Barker

harrogate2 - 27 Mar 2006 11:17 GMT
> > There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything other
> > than a x1 CF card.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> Neil Barker

You can get CF cards in x1, x4, x12, x40, and x100, but there are very
few cameras - other than some of the very latest DSLRs - that are able
to take advantage of anything above x1 speed. It always says so in the
hamndbook if they can.

--
Woody

harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com
John Bean - 27 Mar 2006 12:47 GMT
>> > There are VERY few cameras on the market that can use anything
>other
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>to take advantage of anything above x1 speed. It always says so in the
>hamndbook if they can.

1x would be 150kB/sec... which means it would take 10
seconds just to write a modest 1.5MB JPEG.

You only need do a little research to see how wrong your
statement is, and I doubt a "X1" card even exists. If I'm
wrong please supply a reference to a real example.

Signature

John Bean

Neil Barker - 28 Mar 2006 11:02 GMT
> > Ye what ????

> You can get CF cards in x1, x4, x12, x40, and x100, but there are very
> few cameras - other than some of the very latest DSLRs - that are able
> to take advantage of anything above x1 speed. It always says so in the
> hamndbook if they can.

Oh, I'm perfectly aware of different speed CF cards. I simply find your
statement to be a tad ridiculous - 1x speed is 150k/sec and if it were
the case that most digicams wrote at that speed, they'd take absolutely
ages to write files.

Signature

Neil Barker

Liz - 28 Mar 2006 16:27 GMT
>> > Ye what ????
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> the case that most digicams wrote at that speed, they'd take absolutely
> ages to write files.

I'd assumed, being the Typo Queen, that the 1x was a typo.
I'd also like to point out that if the 350D's handbook says what speed
of CF it uses, that info isn't available by using the index, but it
certainly writes very fast to a fast card. (Predictably, it tries to
scare you into using only Canon-brand CFs!)

Slainte

Liz

Signature

Virtual Liz:  http://www.v-liz.com
Kenya; Tanzania; Namibia; India; Seychelles; Galapagos
Photo blog of Make Povery History rally in Edinburgh 2 July 2005:
http://www.v-liz.com/g8rally/protest.htm

Måns Rullgård - 28 Mar 2006 20:01 GMT
>>> > Ye what ????
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> certainly writes very fast to a fast card. (Predictably, it tries to
> scare you into using only Canon-brand CFs!)

Canon was recently giving away Sandisk cards with some of their
cameras.  Presumably they are considered safe.  There was a real issue
with the 350D and (some) Lexar cards.  A firmware update fixed this.

Signature

Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com

harrogate2 - 28 Mar 2006 19:05 GMT
> > > Ye what ????
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> --
> Neil Barker

I admit to standing corrected about the slowest writing speeds, but I
stand by my comments about the highest speed cards.

--
Woody

harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com
Neil Barker - 28 Mar 2006 21:22 GMT
> I admit to standing corrected about the slowest writing speeds, but I
> stand by my comments about the highest speed cards.

Oh, quite - I've got some Lexar 80x cards, plus a Sandisk Extreme -
they're great in my D2X, but wouldn't give the same advantage in say my
Ixus V430.

Signature

Neil Barker

Måns Rullgård - 28 Mar 2006 22:04 GMT
>> I admit to standing corrected about the slowest writing speeds, but I
>> stand by my comments about the highest speed cards.
>
> Oh, quite - I've got some Lexar 80x cards, plus a Sandisk Extreme -
> they're great in my D2X, but wouldn't give the same advantage in say my
> Ixus V430.

But irrespective of the camera, copying the photos to the computer
will be faster with a faster card.  Sometimes this is a factor worth
considering, sometimes it's not.

Signature

Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com

ongar_route@hotmail.com - 26 Mar 2006 19:55 GMT
I don't know if it is relevant to the OPs query, and it may have just
been bad luck, but I have just had to have a month-old 1Gb Crucial
CompactFlash card replaced as it was showing signs of corruption
problems. This was being used in a Konica Minolta D-SLR.

I bought this card as it was the best price I found at the time, but I
am now doubting the wisdom of that decision. I thought Crucial were one
of the best memory companies, but this card issue has shaken my
confidence. I certainly wouldn't go for the cheapest card if I was
buying again... In my opinion, a slightly higher price is better than
risking losing pictures.

That said, kudos to Crucial for a very efficient exchange. From the
hassle-free web-chat to diagnose the problem, through the call to a
very friendly young lady organising the exchange, to delivery of the
new card 3 days later it was one of the best warranty return
experiences I have had.

Hope some of this is helpful

Chris
Mike - 27 Mar 2006 21:09 GMT
> After years of threatening, I've finally bought myself a semi-decent
> camera which should arrive tomorrow.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Cheers,

Minoltas will work with all CF cards, but not all "fast" cards will actually
be fast in a Minolta*.
You are safest to stick with Sandisk or Lexar cards - Sandisk Ultra II or
the Lexar equivalent will allow you to get the best out of the camera, as
well as being relatively future-proof.
Luckily, the price of Sandisk cards has tumbled recently.

Sandisk Extreme III is over-the-top for Minoltas and is not worth the extra
cost for fractional reductions in write times.

You will DEFINITELY be disappointed in the camera's performance if you get a
cheapo slow card!

* The various CF manufacturers have their own methods of accelerating the
write and read speeds. For reasons best known only to themselves, Minolta
have chosen to support (and test their cameras with) only the Sandisk and
Lexar methods.
For instance, a Fuji 100x CF, (which should be well above the camera's speed
capability) is nearly 8 times SLOWER than a Sandisk U II (~60x) in a Konica
Minolta 5D.

Mike
Paul Giverin - 27 Mar 2006 21:30 GMT
>Minoltas will work with all CF cards, but not all "fast" cards will actually
>be fast in a Minolta*.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>You will DEFINITELY be disappointed in the camera's performance if you get a
>cheapo slow card!

Well I was swayed by the fact that I had a £15 voucher to use at Amazon
so I went for a 1Gb Fujifilm x20 card. That meant that the card cost me
£17 so if I've made the wrong choice then its not too much to lose.

The camera arrived today and I'm still trying to plough through the
manual. What do all those buttons do?   ;)

Signature

Paul Giverin

British Jet Engine Website    http://www.britjet.co.uk

John Cartmell - 28 Mar 2006 01:35 GMT
> The camera arrived today and I'm still trying to plough through the
> manual. What do all those buttons do?   ;)

Miracles! ;-)

Have fun.

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com     0845 006 8822
    Qercus magazine    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527        www.finnybank.com
    Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing
                                                     

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.