Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / UK Photography / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

camera insurance

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Johnnie Scott - 13 Mar 2006 20:46 GMT
Is there a company that will insure £1200 worth of camera gear all risks.  I
do not have a house insurance so can't tag on
Thanks John
harrogate2 - 13 Mar 2006 22:19 GMT
> Is there a company that will insure £1200 worth of camera gear all risks.  I
> do not have a house insurance so can't tag on
> Thanks John

Google is your friend - search UK on 'photograpic insurance'

--
Woody

harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com
Roger Blackwell - 13 Mar 2006 23:47 GMT
> Is there a company that will insure £1200 worth of camera gear all risks.  I
> do not have a house insurance so can't tag on
> Thanks John

I have mine insured with http://www.eandl.co.uk/ if that's any use to you.

Roger
Roger Blackwell - 13 Mar 2006 23:47 GMT
> Is there a company that will insure £1200 worth of camera gear all risks.  I
> do not have a house insurance so can't tag on
> Thanks John

I have mine insured with http://www.eandl.co.uk/ if that's any use to you.

Roger
Tony Polson - 14 Mar 2006 00:24 GMT
>> Is there a company that will insure £1200 worth of camera gear all risks.
>I
>> do not have a house insurance so can't tag on
>> Thanks John
>
>I have mine insured with http://www.eandl.co.uk/ if that's any use to you.

Before choosing an insurer, you should ask around and find our what
experience people have had when making claims.

For example, I used to insure my caravan with a company that quoted a
premium that was less than half of those offered by its three
competitors.  I had a sense of self-satisfaction that I had made the
effort to get competitive quotes and chose the cheapest by far.

Of course, pride comes before a fall, and I had to make a claim.  I
rapidly found out why my insurer was the cheapest; they made every
effort possible to avoid paying out at all, and when they did pay out,
they were very skilled at keeping their costs to the absolute minimum.

I don't wish to mention any specific insurer, but those who advertise
by means of a loose leaflet to be found in photography magazines are
probably best avoided.  The cover may seem good, and the premium
reasonable, but just try getting them to pay out quickly and in full.

All insurers tend to look very good until you have to make a claim.
Roger Blackwell - 14 Mar 2006 19:03 GMT
> >> Is there a company that will insure £1200 worth of camera gear all risks.
> >I
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> All insurers tend to look very good until you have to make a claim.

Very good points, I've never had to make a claim for photographic gear so I
have no experience of who is best.  In fact I've only once claimed on
insurance at all and then I was very disappointed, it was the Co-op years
ago.  It is sometimes difficult to decide between a cheap policy (and
difficulty getting a payout which may or may not be needed) and spending
more (and possibly not ever having to make a claim).

Roger
Tony Polson - 14 Mar 2006 20:04 GMT
>Very good points, I've never had to make a claim for photographic gear so I
>have no experience of who is best.  In fact I've only once claimed on
>insurance at all and then I was very disappointed, it was the Co-op years
>ago.  It is sometimes difficult to decide between a cheap policy (and
>difficulty getting a payout which may or may not be needed) and spending
>more (and possibly not ever having to make a claim).

I don't know who is best either.  I insure my gear on my business
insurance, which includes third party, public liability, professional
indemnity plus employer's liability insurance, so the cost of covering
my gear (all risks, new for old, replacement hire) is wrapped up in a
much larger figure.  My insurer specialises in business policies, and
not specifically photography.  I buy on quality of cover, not price,
as I know I am likely, on average, to make about one claim a year -
not necessarily for equipment.

Without wishing to condemn any particular insurer by name (for obvious
reasons) I would strongly reiterate that I would not touch any firm
that advertises by distributing leaflets in photo magazines.
Liz - 15 Mar 2006 17:55 GMT
>>Very good points, I've never had to make a claim for photographic gear so I
>>have no experience of who is best.  In fact I've only once claimed on
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> as I know I am likely, on average, to make about one claim a year -
> not necessarily for equipment.

Mine is insured under my household policy, and the one time I had to
make a claim on photo equipment, they liaised with my travel insurer
behind my back and it all went very smoothly: they covered everything:
maybe the travel insurance paid the excess? (Travel insurance doesn't
cover the full amount of even my modest gear, but I have new-for-old,
worldwide cover in my house insurance). Mind you, they (CU) were the
insurers for my Union, so probably wanted to be careful to keep that
custom, but a few years later the Union unilaterally took it over
anyway. Union, pah! All they're interested in is Financial Services.

Slainte

Liz

Signature

Virtual Liz:  http://www.v-liz.com
Kenya; Tanzania; Namibia; India; Seychelles; Galapagos
Photo blog of Make Povery History rally in Edinburgh 2 July 2005:
http://www.v-liz.com/g8rally/protest.htm

Tony Polson - 16 Mar 2006 01:04 GMT
>>>Very good points, I've never had to make a claim for photographic gear so I
>>>have no experience of who is best.  In fact I've only once claimed on
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>custom, but a few years later the Union unilaterally took it over
>anyway. Union, pah! All they're interested in is Financial Services.

The household policy is the way to go for anyone who isn't a working
photographer.  To be honest, I cannot understand why the original
poster doesn't have contents insurance.  Even if he rents a place, and
even if it is fully furnished, he should have contents insurance if
only for his own personal belongings.

A basic contents policy with an all risks extension for personal use
of the photo gear will probably cost less than the pathetic cover from
companies advertising their policies in leaflets to be found in photo
magazines*.  There will also be far less problems in making a
successful claim.

* Liz, I don't know how many times this point needs to be made before
people get it!  And if they don't know which insurers I am referring
to, they should look further up the thread and think hard.
Tony Parkinson - 17 Mar 2006 08:25 GMT
> * Liz, I don't know how many times this point needs to be made before
> people get it!  And if they don't know which insurers I am referring
> to, they should look further up the thread and think hard.

Tony, I'm sure people can figure it out Easily & Lazily

;^)
Tony Polson - 20 Mar 2006 00:51 GMT
>> * Liz, I don't know how many times this point needs to be made before
>> people get it!  And if they don't know which insurers I am referring
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>;^)

Perhaps that hints at the root of the problem?  It is 'easier and
lazier' to insure with the company that gives you a free leaflet that
falls out of the magazine without any user input.  

So I suppose the 'easily and lazily insured' deserve all they don't
get when they make a claim.

;-)
Tony Parkinson - 14 Mar 2006 09:23 GMT
> I have mine insured with http://www.eandl.co.uk/ if that's any use to you.

Well, it probably wouldn't be any use to him if he tried to claim given how
restrictive their T&C are
Ian Pollard - 14 Mar 2006 17:16 GMT
>Is there a company that will insure £1200 worth of camera gear all risks.  I
>do not have a house insurance so can't tag on
>Thanks John

Yes, E and L will cover you and for a small extra sum will cover gear
unattended in a vehicle.

Ian
Guess Who - 14 Mar 2006 23:16 GMT
>>Is there a company that will insure £1200 worth of camera gear all risks.
>>I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yes, E and L will cover you and for a small extra sum will cover gear
> unattended in a vehicle.

Read the small print re. hatchbacks- thats why I'm changing from them.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.