> Is the use of a teleconverter EVER as good as a decent long lens of
> equivalent fl?
>
> Example...I have a f2.8 200mm lens. If I add the 2x converter to make it
> 400mm am I going to get as good a lens as if I bought the 400mm f5.6?
No. If it's a *dedicated* converter - designed specifically for that lens -
then you'll get close. Otherwise, it will always be an inferior solution.
Just how inferior is another matter...

Signature
www.diverse-art.com
Gordon Hudson - 22 Sep 2005 09:52 GMT
>> Is the use of a teleconverter EVER as good as a decent long lens of
>> equivalent fl?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> then you'll get close. Otherwise, it will always be an inferior solution.
> Just how inferior is another matter...
I used to play around with teleconverters, especially when I worked in the
trade and could borrow stock.
I can honestly say that the general purpose ones (even the expensive ones at
that time) were pretty poor.
The "extenders" you get for specific lenses did work but the cost of the
extender made it a better bet
to go the whole hog and have two lenses.
It really depends on whats available second hand or discounted new at the
time you go looking,
or you could do what I do and spend years lookig before pouncing on the
right lens when it comes along.