This is further to the "mother's going digital" discussions, but isn't
really related to the choice of camera so I've started a new thread.
I note that many of the cameras we're considering offer both a 4:3 and a
3:2 version of their highest resolution setting. Leaving aside the loss
of a few pixels, 3:2 is obviously better suited to printing out at 6x4
while 4:3 is better for 8x6 prints, and 7x5 is somewhere in the middle.
4:3 is also closer to the ratio of A-series paper. Does anyone here
actually use a 3:2 mode? Why?
Given that when my mother sends photos for printing they'll often be at
6x4, would it be easier for her to use the 3:2 mode as standard, or do
cameras have some kind of "framing guide" so that you can shoot 4:3 but
know where the 3:2 "safe area" is (rather like shooting widescreen film
or video)?
Any thoughts? Is there a compelling reason to use 3:2 modes that I've
not thought of?
Hwyl!
M.

Signature
Martin Angove: http://www.tridwr.demon.co.uk/
Two free issues: http://www.livtech.co.uk/ Living With Technology
... I tried snorting coke...and almost DROWNED
Michael A. Sewell - 23 Aug 2005 17:36 GMT
Just thought I'd point out that 3:2 is the format found in SLRs
Michael
Remove brains to reply
> This is further to the "mother's going digital" discussions, but isn't
> really related to the choice of camera so I've started a new thread.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> M.
Trev - 23 Aug 2005 19:11 GMT
Just thought I'd point out that 3:2 is the format found in SLRs
Mine was 7.62
Michael
Remove brains to reply
> This is further to the "mother's going digital" discussions, but isn't
> really related to the choice of camera so I've started a new thread.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> M.
if - 23 Aug 2005 22:02 GMT
> I note that many of the cameras we're considering offer both a 4:3 and a
> 3:2 version of their highest resolution setting. Leaving aside the loss
> of a few pixels, 3:2 is obviously better suited to printing out at 6x4
> while 4:3 is better for 8x6 prints, and 7x5 is somewhere in the middle.
> 4:3 is also closer to the ratio of A-series paper. Does anyone here
> actually use a 3:2 mode? Why?
ISTM that at 1.41:1, A-series is midway between 4:3 (1.33:1) and 3:2
(1.5:1).
3:2 is 35mm format and a more pleasing shape, not far short of the "golden
mean" of 1.618:1.
4:3 is TV shape and I think it is intended for looking at pictures on your
computer monitor or TV.

Signature
It was a place to kill time, for those who like it better dead.
Tony Polson - 23 Aug 2005 23:31 GMT
>This is further to the "mother's going digital" discussions, but isn't
>really related to the choice of camera so I've started a new thread.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>4:3 is also closer to the ratio of A-series paper. Does anyone here
>actually use a 3:2 mode? Why?
Millions of people use a 3:2 format.
It's called 35mm film.
;-)
Michael J Davis - 24 Aug 2005 09:51 GMT
Tony Polson <tp@nospam.co.uk> observed
>>This is further to the "mother's going digital" discussions, but isn't
>>really related to the choice of camera so I've started a new thread.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>;-)
And in my 48 years of using that format, one could never get photo paper
to fit!
Mike
[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]

Signature
Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><