Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / UK Photography / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Scanner for medium format - Canon 9900F vs Epson 4870?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mark Harrington - 20 Dec 2004 22:59 GMT
I am looking for a scanner for medium format film (colour negative).

I can't afford a Nikon Coolscan LS9000 or a Minolta Dimage Scan Multi, or
even an Epson F3200, so I'm looking for a flat-bed scanner with transparency
adaptor.

Can anyone comment on the relative merits of the Canon 9900F and the Epson
4870 (which I believe is soon to be replaced by the 4990)?

How sharp are the scans going to be at 4800dpi?

Are there any other scanners I should consider around GBP 300?

Any experience or information anyone can share would be appreciated.

TIA

Mark Harrington
David Kilpatrick - 21 Dec 2004 01:32 GMT
not used the Canon but we have a 4870 on test and it's good even for
35mm - not quite as sharp as a film scanner, but very acceptable.

David

> I am looking for a scanner for medium format film (colour negative).
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Mark Harrington

Signature

Icon Publications Ltd - f2, Master and Photoworld magazines
http://www.f2photo.co.uk    http://www.freelancephotographer.co.uk
Stock images at www.alamy.com -
Icon Digital Featurepix & David and Shirley Kilpatrick

Mark Harrington - 22 Dec 2004 22:49 GMT
David:

Thanks for the information.

Mark Harrington

> not used the Canon but we have a 4870 on test and it's good even for
> 35mm - not quite as sharp as a film scanner, but very acceptable.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Stock images at www.alamy.com -
> Icon Digital Featurepix & David and Shirley Kilpatrick
Trev - 21 Dec 2004 09:13 GMT
>I am looking for a scanner for medium format film (colour negative).
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> TIA

My 8000 is nice and clear and sharp, but with fare on is slow
Mark Dunn - 21 Dec 2004 10:27 GMT
This is a question for alt.comp.perpiphs.scanner which helped me a lot.

> >I am looking for a scanner for medium format film (colour negative).
> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> >
> My 8000 is nice and clear and sharp, but with fare on is slow
Mark Harrington - 22 Dec 2004 22:56 GMT
Mark:

Thanks for that - I wasn't aware of that group.

For anyone else interested I have now found a review which compares the
Canon and Epson:
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Scanners/Canon_9950F/page_1.htm

This review puts the Canon hardware a whisker ahead of the Epson, but the
Epson software way ahead of the Canon.

Mark Harrington

> This is a question for alt.comp.perpiphs.scanner which helped me a lot.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> > >
> > My 8000 is nice and clear and sharp, but with fare on is slow
Mark Harrington - 22 Dec 2004 22:50 GMT
Trev:

Thanks for your comments.

Mark Harrington

> >I am looking for a scanner for medium format film (colour negative).
> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> >
> My 8000 is nice and clear and sharp, but with fare on is slow
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.