Feedback Wanted

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Isaac and Karey Helgens - 31 May 2004 06:48 GMT

Just updated my fine art photography site.

Comments are really appreciated

www.khelgens.com
karey@khelgens.com

Reply to this Message

dslr - 31 May 2004 08:01 GMT

> Just updated my fine art photography site.
>
> Comments are really appreciated

Certainly - would you please define what you mean by "fine art" photgraphy.

--
regards,
dslr

Reply to this Message

Tony Parkinson - 31 May 2004 19:40 GMT

> > Just updated my fine art photography site.
> >
> > Comments are really appreciated
>
> Certainly - would you please define what you mean by "fine art" photgraphy.

The stuff they forgot to take the "ine " out of

--
The only thing that keeps me from realising my full potential is the
depressing awareness that it probably wouldn't take much time or effort...

Reply to this Message

TP - 31 May 2004 09:54 GMT

>Just updated my fine art photography site.
>
>Comments are really appreciated
>
>www.khelgens.com
>karey@khelgens.com

Comments:

1. Self indulgence of a very high degree.

2. A waste of bandwidth.

3. Your mirror must be worn out. Give it a rest.

4. Have a nice day.

That's enough comments for now.

Reply to this Message

Pete - 31 May 2004 11:57 GMT

In article <1islb0l3kop3m1if0a3rlgs80gv734g43c@4ax.com>, tp@nospam.net wrote

> >Just updated my fine art photography site.
> >Comments are really appreciated
> Comments:

> 1. Self indulgence of a very high degree.

Agreed

> 2. A waste of bandwidth.

Agreed

> 3. Your mirror must be worn out. Give it a rest.

Agreed

> 4. Have a nice day.
> That's enough comments for now.

'Fine Art'- to quote dslr - I think this quallifies the
point made above [1]

Reply to this Message

dslr - 31 May 2004 12:10 GMT

>>> Just updated my fine art photography site.
>>> Comments are really appreciated
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> 'Fine Art'- to quote dslr - I think this quallifies the
> point made above [1]

The reply I got (by email, but not to the newsgroup) was "non snap-shot type
photography" ;-)

--
regards,
dslr

Reply to this Message

Pete - 31 May 2004 14:09 GMT

In article <c9f3rj$5ib$1@hercules.btinternet.com>, dslr.nospam@btopenworld.com wrote

> >>> Just updated my fine art photography site.
> >>> Comments are really appreciated
> >> Comments:

> >> 1. Self indulgence of a very high degree.

> > Agreed

> >> 2. A waste of bandwidth.

> > Agreed

> >> 3. Your mirror must be worn out. Give it a rest.

> > Agreed

> >> 4. Have a nice day.
> >> That's enough comments for now.

> > 'Fine Art'- to quote dslr - I think this quallifies the
> > point made above [1]

> The reply I got (by email, but not to the newsgroup) was "non snap-shot type
> photography" ;-)

Well in that case just about all my efforts must be
categorised as Fine Art then. Since I rarely take a
'snap - shot' which I do do but set out to do so.

I could take a sh.t on my lawn do a close up with
a dandelion poking out of the top of it and caputre
it still steaming and then call that fine art. eh?

:-)))

Reply to this Message

dslr - 31 May 2004 14:21 GMT

>>>>> Just updated my fine art photography site.
>>>>> Comments are really appreciated
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> a dandelion poking out of the top of it and caputre
> it still steaming and then call that fine art. eh?

As long as it wsn't a snapshit ;-)

--
regards,
dslr

Reply to this Message

Tony Parkinson - 31 May 2004 19:42 GMT

> I could take a sh.t on my lawn do a close up with
> a dandelion poking out of the top of it and caputre
> it still steaming and then call that fine art. eh?

Your secret is out, you're really Tracey Emin in drag

--
The only thing that keeps me from realising my full potential is the
depressing awareness that it probably wouldn't take much time or effort...

Reply to this Message

Stephen Leslie - 31 May 2004 21:00 GMT

Hi Kerey,

I'll just comment on one of your portrait images as I don't like the others.
The only one I do like is the first one of the young boy, but this could be
improved by cropping ust above the nose and losing the right eye, making
more impact and focus.

Have to say that while your site looks nice, it is not easy to navigate as
for new users you do not make it clear that they have to click on an image
to enlarge and when I went to view your projects you place the sub-menu
under the main one, again with no clear instruction on what to select.

I'm no web designer but hope you make use of these comments as you will get
more visits by considering your viewers needs (can you tell I've worked in
customer services ;-).

Cheers,
Stephen

> Just updated my fine art photography site.
>
> Comments are really appreciated
>
> www.khelgens.com
> karey@khelgens.com

Reply to this Message