Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / UK Photography / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New magazines (info as much as promo)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David Kilpatrick - 27 May 2004 21:20 GMT
For anyone interested, we have just published the first edition - Vol 1
No 1 - of Konica Minolta Photoworld, a new quarterly to replace the
former Minolta Image. It's going to be £19.95 a year with a website,
forum and stuff behind it but at present it's still £14.95 on any old
Minolta Club application forms or via our un-amended, hopelessly muddled
website (very soon to be replaced).

In June, we publish the first edition of 'f2' magazine which is about as
close as possible to the 1997 'Photon' digital editions in size and
approach - seven years in the wilderness trying to balance what various
reader groups wanted/hated, and we have finally ended up with what we
started with - a serious mix of digital and conventional, fine art and
practical (freelance/publishing/exhibiting/competing biased) stuff. This
is £24.95 six issues a year. Again, the current website is out of tune
with itself - some information is correct - but the price there is £25
and any subs received will get seven issues.

I intend to try to get binders organised for these new titles as it's
something readers have been complaining about since we stopped doing so
in 1994 (the damn things take up HUGE amounts of space).

David Kilpatrick
Publisher/editor (of both)
David Littlewood - 28 May 2004 18:31 GMT
>For anyone interested, we have just published the first edition - Vol 1
>No 1 - of Konica Minolta Photoworld, a new quarterly to replace the
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>David Kilpatrick
>Publisher/editor (of both)

David,

Thank you for this information. However, I don't think I can be the only
subscriber who gets confused by the frequent changes in title. I may
well be interested in expanding my subscription to Freelance
Photographer to include the digital magazine, but I lose the will to
live trying to keep track of which magazine is which, and what their
titles are this year.

BTW, please don't take this the wrong way, I like the magazine(s) and
recommend them to any keen photographer - as I have done several times
in NGs.

As for binders, I mostly gave up on putting the majority of my (rather
large) collection of magazines in binders; for most I prefer to use the
plastic slot-in type commonly available in stationers. The main reason
for this is that the "proper" ones with metal rods are inefficient on
space: the spine is usually 50% wider than the magazines. (Yes, I know
you can cut down the inefficiency by alternating them on the shelf, but
this only halves the loss.)
Signature

David Littlewood

David Kilpatrick - 28 May 2004 21:14 GMT
> Thank you for this information. However, I don't think I can be the only
> subscriber who gets confused by the frequent changes in title. I may
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> you can cut down the inefficiency by alternating them on the shelf, but
> this only halves the loss.)

When we had binders done they were custom made slim ones and quite neat,
with cords not rods, and they held two years or more at a time. I shall
investigate the options anyway.

There is no option to expand Freelance to include the digital mag... in
brief, the Master Photographers Association decided there was too much
equipment and technique in 'their' magazine (which they paid for at half
the rate of a normal subscription, with half the number of readers to
make it viable). They also disliked the way that the 'digital' issues
attracted twice as much advertising, had far more content, and appeared
to make digital seem more important than photography per se. We made a
compromise first by boosting the size of the non-digital editions by
adding 32 pages from Freelance, reprinted free of charge, but they
didn't like or understand the content - if the pictures were good, they
outclassed professional work and that's not acceptable; if they were not
good (in the professional eye) that was equally unacceptable. Essential
what the pro studio portrait photographer wants to see if work just like
his/hers but a little different, or better, or comparable but with some
commercial lesson to be had from its success.

In the meantime, I had acquired almost 1000 outside readers for the
digital magazine, who were not going to be happy seeing it disappear.

The Bureau of Freelance Photographers, who got involved with Freelance
when I launched it by pointing out that they sort of had a claim on the
name - we disagreed but I said 'OK, let's just work together' - were 100
per cent happy with a name change, and with the digital content coming
into Freelance. They said that more than half their members were now
shooting digital, all the clients were insisting on digital, the
libraries had all gone digital and in the five years since Freelance
launched, the world had changed.

We should change with it and so we have - f2 is 'Freelance+Digital' as a
strapline, but really, it will be an all-round mag aimed at anyone
working towards publication, stock sales, exhibition, print selling,
award and contest entry, or just aspiring to that general field. My 1000
digital readers have been transferred to f2, MPA gets their rather
slimmer monthly with just their own stuff and their own news, and my
creative efforts will be concentrated on the title I own - f2 - and not
the title which takes most of my time - MPA. The other way round is
suicide. f2 is going to be the best thing I've done, I hope, though some
of the early 1990s flash will never be recovered. Duotone varnished
pages on matt stock... cut outs on the page for photo frames... 4-page
gatefold panoramas... all that took some BIG help from the industry,
often volunteered just to see things done well. That money goes on
websites and not print these days, but I still love print; I just like
the result. I wish we could do the extreme quality stuff again and maybe
one day it will come back.

And, seriously, I never see the sort of immaculate sets of fine art
prints which make me say 'this must be high end duotone scanned and spot
varnished'.

David
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.