Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Point & Shoot Cameras / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

kaleidoscope?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AND Books - 11 Jun 2006 03:20 GMT
so this AM a friend came by to marvel at our old hex glass kaleiscope...
she looked and awed at the pretty patterns... i suggested to Patty that
she take our newer Sony 5 Cybershot and see what she can get... the
problems are: 1) is this a Virtual image? and 2) is the set focal length
of the Kaleidoscope to eye something that can get adapted to the Sony
camera? (Like a tube or something) the pix are all blurred, and after
downloading to Photoshop we can get neat patterns, but alas, not in focus!

I don't wanna reinvent the wheel! I thought i knew enough about optics
but experience here would help alot... I do know that a polarizing
microscope can yield alot of nice pattern images, but is the cheap 50cent
Kaleidoscope inherently different?

Any suggestion(s) are appreciated... thanks

jsz
Whiskers - 12 Jun 2006 00:54 GMT
> so this AM a friend came by to marvel at our old hex glass kaleiscope...
> she looked and awed at the pretty patterns... i suggested to Patty that
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> jsz

I don't think there are any optical elements in the 'cheap toy' type of
kaleidoscope; just a sheet of shiny metal or plastic bent to form an angle,
and a shallow tray of 'interesting shapes and colours' with a translucent
backing.  You see a pattern formed by the directly-visible bits of stuff
and their reflections (and possibly reflections-of-reflections).  An
auto-focus camera  may struggle to work out where to focus; the distance
from the 'eye-hole' to the end of the instrument, would be very slightly
more than the actual distance that needs to be focused on.  That may be
too short for some cameras to manage - the 'macro' setting may work
better, if there is one.  

If you are prepared to sacrifice the kaleidoscope, it may be easier to get
photographs of the patterns by arranging the tray of bits and the angled
reflector in front of the camera, with an opaque covering to enclose them
and the camera so that light only gets to the camera via the tray of bits
and the reflector.  You could then arrange distances to suit the lens.
Getting the alignment of the parts, including the camera, 'just so', could
be tricky.

A web search for

   kaleidoscope photography

should yield some interesting links  ;))

Kaleidoscopes themselves can easily become something of an obsession; be
warned!

Signature

-- ^^^^^^^^^^
--  Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~

MartinS - 12 Jun 2006 02:11 GMT
>> so this AM a friend came by to marvel at our old hex glass
>> kaleiscope... she looked and awed at the pretty patterns... i
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> Kaleidoscopes themselves can easily become something of an obsession;
> be warned!

You could always fake one with Photoshop.

Signature

Martin S.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.