Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Photo Technique / People Photography / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Requesting Critique

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Chris - 13 Aug 2006 05:02 GMT
Just wanted to hear your reactions:

http://www.chrismaness.com/backend/misc/diego2b.jpg
Stephane Schmuck - 14 Aug 2006 17:14 GMT
> Just wanted to hear your reactions:
> http://www.chrismaness.com/backend/misc/diego2b.jpg

Hello Chris,

the Picture is maybe too unsharp and crispy...
In my opinion the main Part of the Picture is the Boy and not the edge
of the screen...but this edge is sharp and not the boy.
i Know, it is a difficult light situation, but what did you use for a
f-stop and ISO speed ? Maybe this could be the problem :-)

Greetix,

Stéphane.

Signature

"Living in the earth is expensive but it does
include a free trip around the Sun every year!"
http://www.sck-photo.de ( For E-Mail remove the _nospam to write me )

Chris - 16 Aug 2006 17:13 GMT
> > Just wanted to hear your reactions:
> > http://www.chrismaness.com/backend/misc/diego2b.jpg
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> include a free trip around the Sun every year!"
> http://www.sck-photo.de ( For E-Mail remove the _nospam to write me )

I used 200 speed @ f/2

The camera is an old Yashica rangefinder that will do f/1.4.  I like
the camera, but I think the rangefinder is off.  It seems to be
consistantly focusing behind the subject.  I think I will go back to
using my canon with my f/1.4 50mm prime.
Stephane Schmuck - 16 Aug 2006 21:37 GMT
> I used 200 speed @ f/2
>
> The camera is an old Yashica rangefinder that will do f/1.4.  I like
> the camera, but I think the rangefinder is off.  It seems to be
> consistantly focusing behind the subject.  I think I will go back to
> using my canon with my f/1.4 50mm prime.
Hello Chris,
yes if you have focused on another part of the picture, your rangefinder
seems to be out of focus...but you can adjust it with a
screwdriver...canon is not the same as MF :-)

What for I have no explanation is the lot of grain...200 ISO ist not too
fast and grany for modern film emulsions, what did you use for a film ?

Greetix,

Stéphane

Signature

"Living in the earth is expensive but it does
include a free trip around the Sun every year!"
http://www.sck-photo.de ( For E-Mail remove the _nospam to write me )

Chris - 16 Aug 2006 21:47 GMT
> > I used 200 speed @ f/2
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> include a free trip around the Sun every year!"
> http://www.sck-photo.de ( For E-Mail remove the _nospam to write me )

Kodak Gold 200.  I think it is a little baked from the hot car.
However, I like the grainy look.  That is kindof what I was going for a
really rugged available light grainy shot, but I guess the out of focus
part is too much to stomach for people to get it.
no_name - 14 Aug 2006 18:33 GMT
> Just wanted to hear your reactions:
>
> http://www.chrismaness.com/backend/misc/diego2b.jpg

When photographing people the eyes should be in focus. If you don't get
that, nothing else matters.
Chris - 16 Aug 2006 17:08 GMT
> > Just wanted to hear your reactions:
> >
> > http://www.chrismaness.com/backend/misc/diego2b.jpg
>
> When photographing people the eyes should be in focus. If you don't get
> that, nothing else matters.

Yep, I noticed that right off, but I didn't know you couldn't get a
little creative with where the focus landed.
no_name - 17 Aug 2006 19:31 GMT
>>>Just wanted to hear your reactions:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Yep, I noticed that right off, but I didn't know you couldn't get a
> little creative with where the focus landed.

You can, but for this kind of snapshot it won't be very appealing.
Stacey - 21 Aug 2006 17:55 GMT
okay..now I have read through the replys...rules are made to be broken
right...and of course with all art-it is in the eye of the beholder!

> > > Just wanted to hear your reactions:
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Yep, I noticed that right off, but I didn't know you couldn't get a
> little creative with where the focus landed.
Stacey - 21 Aug 2006 17:50 GMT
Hello, without reading anyother replys and giving you my reaction-I
love it! it has an old time feel to it, I like the grainy soft
effect-not all photos warrant pin sharp focus. I use a Sima soft focus
lens to get my grainy soft effect-its one of my favorite lenes to use,
especially when photographing kids! I will read on for more info and
opinions! Be well!
> Just wanted to hear your reactions:
>
> http://www.chrismaness.com/backend/misc/diego2b.jpg
Chris - 22 Aug 2006 00:30 GMT
> Hello, without reading anyother replys and giving you my reaction-I
> love it! it has an old time feel to it, I like the grainy soft
> effect-not all photos warrant pin sharp focus. I use a Sima soft focus
> lens to get my grainy soft effect-its one of my favorite lenes to use,
> especially when photographing kids! I will read on for more info and
> opinions! Be well!

Wow, your the only one that liked it.  Everyone else seemed to dislike
it.
Duca V2 - 26 Aug 2006 21:09 GMT
> Just wanted to hear your reactions:
>
> http://www.chrismaness.com/backend/misc/diego2b.jpg
Not sure of what was your goal, but the idea of enhancing the lights and the
control on the videogame, and render the child in that way, doesn't look bad
to me. The attention is still on the child, but being it out of focus tells
me something anyway.
Ciao
Duca V
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.